TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
☐
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐
| Preliminary Proxy Statement |
☐
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| ☒
| Definitive Proxy Statement |
| ☐
| Definitive Additional Materials |
| ☐
| Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
HUB GROUP, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
HUB GROUP, INC.
|
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
|
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☐ | ☐ | | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | | | Fee computed on table belowin exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.0-11 |
| (1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| (2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| | |
| (3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| | |
| (4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| | |
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| ☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
| (1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
| | |
| (2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
| | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
March 22, 2017
Hub Group, Inc.
2001 Hub Group Way
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60523
April 14, 2023
Dear
Fellow Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend
We will hold the
20172023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(the “Annual Meeting”) of Hub Group, Inc.
This meeting will be held at Hub Group’s Corporate Headquarters, located at 2000 Clearwater Drive, Oak Brook, Illinois at 10:00 a.m. Central
timeTime on
Wednesday,Thursday, May
10, 2017.25, 2023. Our Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting physically.
As in prior years, we have again elected to provide access to our proxy materials over the Internet under the Securities and Exchange Commission’s “notice and access” rules. The
accompanying Notice of
20172023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement describes the matters to be acted upon and is available at
www.proxyvote.com and at our corporate website www.hubgroup.com/proxy.html. Theproxy. Our Annual Report
to Stockholders on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 also is
also available at
this website.those websites. We hopebelieve that providing our proxy materials over the Internet increases the ability of our stockholders to obtain the information they need, while reducing the environmental impact of the Annual Meeting and our costs associated with the physical printing and mailing of proxy materials.
It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual Meeting. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HUBG2023, you will be able to attendmust enter the meeting. However,control number found on your proxy card, voting instruction form or notice you previously received. You may vote during the Annual Meeting by following the instructions available on the meeting website during the meeting, although, even if you anticipate attending in person,the virtual meeting, we urge you to please vote your proxy either by mail, telephone or over the Internet in advance of the Annual Meeting to ensure that your shares will be represented. If you attend,We hope you will of course, be entitledparticipate in the Annual Meeting.
I look forward to
voteupdating you on developments in
person.our business at the Annual Meeting. | | | Sincerely, |
| | | |
|  |
| | |
| | DAVID P.PHILLIP D. YEAGER |
| Chairman
President and Chief Executive Officer |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
PLEASE VOTE EITHER BY
MAIL, TELEPHONE OR OVER THE INTERNET
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ANNUAL MEETING.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
HUB GROUP, INC.
Hub Group, Inc.
2001 Hub Group Way
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60523
NOTICE OF
20172023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To the Stockholders of Hub Group, Inc.:
The
2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(the “Annual Meeting”) of Hub Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held
at Hub Group’s Corporate Headquarters, located at 2000 Clearwater Drive, Oak Brook, Illinoisexclusively online via the Internet on
Wednesday,Thursday, May
10, 2017,25, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. Central time for the following purposes:
| (1)
| To elect the eightten nominees listed in thisthe accompanying proxy statement to the Company’s board of directors of the Company;directors; |
| (2)
| To holdapprove, on an advisory vote on executive compensation;basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers; |
| (3)
| To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation; |
| (4)
| To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm;accountants for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023; |
| (5)
| To approve an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to limit the Hub Group, Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan;liability of certain officers of the Company as permitted by recent amendments to Delaware law; and |
| (6)
| To transact such other business as may properly be presented at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
We plan to send a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
(the “Notice”) to our stockholders instead of paper copies of our proxy statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022. The Notice, which is expected to be mailed to stockholders on or about
March 22, 2017. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy MaterialsApril 14, 2023, contains instructions on how to access our materials on the Internet, as well as instructions on obtaining a paper copy of the proxy materials. The Notice
of Internet Availability of Proxy Material is not a form for voting and presents only an overview of the proxy materials.
The Annual Meeting will be presented exclusively online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HUBG2023. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit your questions to management during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HUBG2023.
Your vote is important and we encourage you to vote in advance of the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, please vote by telephone or over the Internet, or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card or voting instruction form so that your shares will be represented at the Annual Meeting. Instructions for voting are described in the Notice, the Proxy Statement and the proxy card.
The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March
13, 2017,29, 2023, as the record date for determining stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting.
| | | By order of the Board of Directors, |
| | | |
|  | | THOMAS P. LAFRANCE |
| | | Secretary |
Oak Brook, Illinois | DOUGLAS G. BECK | | |
April 14, 2023 | Secretary | | |
Oak Brook, Illinois
March 22, 2017
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
PLEASE VOTE YOUR PROXY EITHER BY
MAIL, TELEPHONE OR OVER THE INTERNET
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.
Important Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Stockholders Meeting to be Held on May 10, 2017
The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Stockholders are
Available atwww.hubgroup.com/proxy.html
TABLE OF CONTENTS
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2023
This Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, our Proxy Statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and a form of proxy card or voting instruction form (collectively, the “Proxy Materials”) are available at www.proxyvote.com. You will need your Notice of Internet Availability (“Notice”) or proxy card to access the Proxy Materials there. A copy of our Proxy Materials also can be found on our corporate website – www.hubgroup.com/proxy.
As permitted by rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), we are furnishing our Proxy Materials over the Internet to some of our stockholders. This means that some stockholders will not receive paper copies of these documents but instead will receive only a Notice containing instructions on how to access the Proxy Materials over the Internet and how to request a paper copy of our Proxy Materials. Stockholders who do not receive a Notice will receive a paper copy of the Proxy Materials by mail, unless they have previously requested delivery of Proxy Materials electronically.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
iii
[This page intentionally left blank]
2001 Hub Group Way
HUB GROUP, INC.
2000 CLEARWATER DRIVE
OAK BROOK, ILLINOIS 60523
PROXY STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of Hub Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Hub Group” or the “Company”), of proxies for use at the 2017
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held on Wednesday, May 10, 2017,25, 2023
SOLICITATION, MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION
A:
| This document is the Proxy Statement of Hub Group, Inc. that is being made available to stockholders on the Internet, or sent to stockholders by mail or electronically by e-mail upon request, in connection with our Annual Meeting of stockholders to be held on Thursday, May 25, 2023 exclusively online via the Internet (the “Annual Meeting”). A proxy card is also being furnished with this document, if you requested printed copies of the Proxy Materials. We have tried to make this document simple and easy to understand. The SEC encourages companies to use “plain English,” and we always try to communicate with you clearly and effectively. We refer to Hub Group, Inc. throughout as “we,” “us,” the “Company” or “Hub Group.” Additionally, unless otherwise noted or required by context, “2023,” “2022,” and “2021,” refer to our fiscal years ended or ending December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021, respectively. |
Q:
| What documents constitute our “proxy materials”? |
A:
| The Proxy Materials include the Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Proxy Statement, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the proxy card or voting instruction form. |
Q:
| What is a proxy, who is asking for it, and who is paying for the cost to solicit it? |
A:
| A proxy is your legal designation of another person, called a “proxy,” to vote your stock. The document that designates someone as your proxy is also called a proxy or a proxy card. |
Our directors, officers, and employees are soliciting your proxy on behalf of our Board of Directors. Those persons will not receive additional payment or compensation for doing so except reimbursement for any adjournment thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statementrelated out-of-pocket expenses. We will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks, custodians and accompanying formsimilar organizations for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners. Solicitation of proxies by mail may be supplemented by telephone, personal contact, email and other electronic means, advertisements and personal solicitation, or otherwise. The Company will pay the expense of any proxy are first being sentsolicitation. We may hire a proxy solicitation firm at standard industry rates to assist in the solicitation of proxies.
Q:
| Why did I receive a one-page notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials? |
A:
| Pursuant to SEC rules, the Company is using the Internet as the primary means of furnishing proxy materials to stockholders again this year. Accordingly, the Company is sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to the Company’s stockholders. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials online. Instructions on how to request a printed copy of the proxy materials also may be found in the Notice. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
basis. The Company encourages stockholders
on or about March 22, 2017.The Company’s Class A common stock, $.01 par value (the “Class A Common Stock”), and Class B common stock, $.01 par value (the “Class B Common Stock,” together with the Class A Common Stock, the “Common Stock”), are the only issued and outstanding classes of stock. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 13, 2017 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Astake advantage of the Record Date,availability of the Company had 33,480,802 sharesproxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the environmental impact of Class A Common Stock (each a “Class A Share”)its Annual Meetings and 662,296 shares of Class B Common Stock (each a “Class B Share,” and collectively with the Class A Shares, the “Shares”) outstanding and entitled to vote.
PROXIES, VOTING RIGHTS,QUORUM AND PROCEDURES
Shares represented by an effective proxy given by a stockholder will be voted as directed by the stockholder. If a properly signed proxy form is returnedcost to the Company and one or more proposals are not marked, it will be voted in accordanceassociated with the recommendationphysical printing and mailing of the Board of Directors on all such proposals. A stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time prior to the voting of the proxy by giving written notice to the Secretary of the Company, by executing a later dated proxy or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. If your shares are held in a bank or brokerage account, you will receive proxy materials from your bank or broker, which will include a voting instruction form. If you would like to attend the Annual Meeting and vote these shares in person, you must obtain a proxy from your bank or broker. You must request this form from your bank or broker; they will not automatically supply one to you.
Each Class A Share is entitled to one (1) vote and each Class B Share is entitled to approximately eighty-four (84) votes. The Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the “Bylaws”) provide that one third of Sharesmaterials.
Q:
| Why am I receiving these materials? |
A:
| You received the Notice and you are receiving this document because you were one of our stockholders on March 29, 2023, the record date for the Annual Meeting. We are soliciting your proxy (i.e., your permission) to vote your shares of Hub Group stock upon certain matters at the Annual Meeting. |
Q:
| What if I have more than one account? |
A:
| Please vote proxies for all accounts to ensure that all your shares are voted. You may consolidate multiple accounts through our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (“AST”), online at www.astfinancial.com or by calling (800) 937-5449. |
Q:
| Who may access the virtual Annual Meeting? |
A:
| Only stockholders and their proxy holders will be able to access the virtual Annual Meeting. As indicated, we will not have an in-person Annual Meeting. You will need to enter the 16-digit control number received with your proxy card or the Notice to enter the Annual Meeting via the online web portal. See “If I vote by proxy, can I still access the Annual Meeting and vote there if I choose?” below. |
Q:
| How many votes must be present to hold the Annual Meeting? Do abstentions and “broker non-votes” count? |
A:
| Our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”) provide that the presence of the holders of one-third of the shares of capital stock entitled to vote at a meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who participate in the virtual Annual Meeting will be deemed to be present in person. A quorum must exist to conduct any business at the Annual Meeting. If a quorum is not present at the Annual Meeting, the holders of the stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote thereat have power, by a majority of the votes cast by shares represented in person or by proxy, to adjourn the meeting to another time and/or place, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until a quorum is be present or represented. |
Abstentions will be treated as Sharesshares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. If you are a beneficial stockholder and your shares are held in the name of a broker, the broker has the authority to vote shares for which you do not provide voting instructions only with respect to certain “routine” matters. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee who holds shares for another does not vote on a particular matter because the matter is not a “routine” matter for which the broker has discretionary voting authority and the broker has not received instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. The proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm is deemed a “routine” matter. All other proposals described in this proxy statement do not relate to “routine” matters. As a result, a broker will not be able to vote your shares with respect to these proposals absent your voting instructions. Additionally, broker non-votes are included in the calculation of the number of votes considered to be present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum only when there are “routine” matters to be voted upon. Because there is a “routine” matter to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting, broker non-votes also will be included for purposes of determining a quorum. An inspectorSee “What are ‘broker votes’ and ‘broker non-votes’?” below.
Q:
| Who may vote at the Annual Meeting? |
A:
| Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 29, 2023 (the “Record Date”), are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, there were 32,799,567 shares of Class A Common Stock (each a “Class A Share”) and 574,903 shares of Class B Common Stock (each a “Class B Share,” and collectively with the Class A Shares, the “Shares”) outstanding and entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Each Class A Share is entitled to one (1) vote and each Class B Share is entitled to approximately eighty-four (84) votes. |
Q:
| Will a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting be available? |
A:
| In accordance with Delaware law, a list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting beginning May 15, 2023 at our corporate headquarters during regular business hours. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Q:
| What am I voting on at the Annual Meeting? |
A:
| There are five proposals to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting: |
To elect the ten director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement to our Board of elections appointedDirectors, each to serve a one-year term expiring at the earlier of the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2024 Annual Meeting”) or upon his or her successor being elected and qualified;
To approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (“say-on-pay” vote);
To approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the frequency of the “say-on-pay” votes (“say-on-frequency” vote);
To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) as our independent registered public accountants for 2023; and
To approve the meetingamendment to Hub Group, Inc.’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to limit the liability of certain officers of the Company as permitted by recent amendments to Delaware law (the “Charter Amendment”).
We will tabulatealso consider other business that properly comes before the Annual Meeting in accordance with Delaware law and our Bylaws.
Q:
| What are my choices when voting on the election of the ten director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement, and what vote is needed to elect nominees to the Board of Directors? |
A:
| Regarding the vote on the election of the ten director nominees identified in this Proxy Statement to serve until the 2024 Annual Meeting or until his or her successor is elected and qualified, stockholders may: |
| • | vote “FOR” all of the director nominees; |
| • | vote in “FOR ALL EXCEPT” specific director nominees; or |
| • | vote to “WITHHOLD ALL” authority to vote for all director nominees. |
Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by proxy orthe shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on the election of directors provided a quorum is present. Withholding of authority to vote in the election and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the election, provided a quorum is present. As a result, the ten nominees receiving the highest number of “FOR” votes will be elected as directors.
Q:
| What are my choices when voting on the advisory (non-binding) proposal regarding the compensation paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“say-on-pay”), and what vote is needed to approve the advisory say-on-pay proposal? |
A:
| Regarding the advisory (non-binding) proposal on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, stockholders may: |
| • | vote “FOR” the advisory say-on-pay proposal; |
| • | vote “AGAINST” the advisory say-on-pay proposal; or |
| • | “ABSTAIN” from voting on the advisory say-on-pay proposal. |
The affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast by the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the say-on-pay vote. As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding upon us. However, our Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions. For additional information, please see the discussion on page 47 of this Proxy Statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS
Q:
| What are my choices when voting on the advisory (non-binding) proposal on the frequency of “say-on-pay” votes (“say-on-frequency”), and what vote is needed to approve the advisory say-on-frequency proposal? |
A:
| Regarding the advisory (non-binding) proposal on frequency of our advisory votes regarding the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers, stockholders may indicate their preference to vote on Named Executive Officer compensation with a frequency of: |
| • | “ABSTAIN” from voting on the advisory say-on-frequency proposal. |
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on an advisory basis, the say-on-frequency vote. As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding upon us. However, our Compensation Committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, values the opinions expressed by our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions. For additional information, please see the discussion on page 48 of this Proxy Statement. Q:
| What are my choices when voting on the ratification of the appointment of E&Y as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023, and what vote is needed to ratify their appointment? |
A:
| Regarding the vote on the proposal to ratify the appointment of E&Y as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for 2023, stockholders may: |
| • | vote “FOR” the ratification; |
| • | vote “AGAINST” the ratification; or |
| • | “ABSTAIN” from voting on the ratification. |
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the Annual Meeting and
such inspectorentitled to vote is required to approve the proposal to ratify the appointment of
elections will determine whether or notE&Y as our independent registered public accountants for 2023. For additional information, please see the discussion on page 50 of this Proxy Statement. Q:
| What are my choices when voting on the approval of the Charter Amendment? |
A:
| Regarding the approval of the Charter Amendment, stockholders may: |
| • | vote “FOR” approving the Charter Amendment; |
| • | vote “AGAINST” approving the Charter Amendment; or |
| • | “ABSTAIN” from voting on the Charter Amendment. |
The affirmative vote of a
quorum is present.
As of March 13, 2017, members of the Yeager family, directly or by trust, own all 662,296 shares of Class B Common Stock (the “Class B Stockholders”). Consequently, the Class B Stockholders control approximately 62%majority of the voting power on all matters presented for stockholder action. Theof our Class A common stock and Class B Stockholders are parties to an Amendedcommon stock outstanding and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, dated April 22, 2014 (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”), pursuant to which they have agreedentitled to vote all of their shares of Class B Common Stock in accordance with the vote of the holders of a majority of such Class B Shares. The Stockholders’ Agreement requires, among other things, that the Class B Stockholders hold a meeting prior toat the Annual Meeting, so that they can determinevoting together as a single class, is required to approve the Charter Amendment. For additional information, please see the discussion on page 52 of this Proxy Statement.
Q:
| How does the Company’s Board of Directors recommend that I vote? |
A:
| Please see the information included in this Proxy Statement relating to the proposals to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting. Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote: |
| • | “FOR ALL” of the ten nominees to our Board of Directors identified in this Proxy Statement; |
| • | “FOR” the advisory (non-binding) proposal regarding the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (“say-on-pay”); |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| • | For a frequency of “ONE YEAR” for the advisory (non-binding) proposal regarding the frequency of advisory votes regarding the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (“say-on-frequency”); |
| • | “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of E&Y as our independent registered public accountants for 2023; and |
| • | “FOR” the approval of the Charter Amendment. |
Q:
| How will the Class B Shares be voted at the Annual Meeting? |
A:
| As of March 29, 2023 members of the Yeager family, directly or by trust, own all 574,903 outstanding Class B Shares (the “Class B Stockholders”). The Class B Stockholders control approximately 59.6% of the voting power on all matters presented for stockholder action. Certain Class B Stockholders (the “Class B Agreement Parties”), representing 351,748 or 61.2% of the Class B Shares and approximately 36.4% of the voting power on all matters presented for stockholder action, are parties to the DPY Stockholders’ Agreement dated February 22, 2023 (the “DPY Stockholders’ Agreement”). The Class B Agreement Parties have agreed in the DPY Stockholders’ Agreement to vote all of their Class B Shares (the “Class B Agreement Shares”) in accordance with the vote of the holders of a majority of the Class B Agreement Shares. Mr. David P. Yeager owns or controls as trustee of certain trusts 311,692 Class B Shares representing a majority of the Class B Agreement Shares. As a result, Mr. David P. Yeager will have the power to direct the vote of all Class B Agreement Shares. |
A:
| If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, AST, you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to those shares. If you are a record holder, the Notice is being sent to you directly by Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”). Please carefully consider the information contained in this Proxy Statement and, whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote by (i) accessing the Internet website specified on the Notice, (ii) calling the toll-free number specified on your proxy card, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials or (iii) marking, signing and returning your proxy card promptly, if you requested printed copies of the proxy materials, so that we can be assured of having a quorum present at the Annual Meeting and so that your shares may be voted in accordance with your wishes, even if you later decide to attend the Annual Meeting. |
If you hold shares in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee you may be able to vote those shares by Internet or telephone depending on the voting procedures used by your broker, bank or other nominee, as explained below under the question “How do I vote if my shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee?”
Q:
| How do I vote if my shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee? |
A:
| If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee (this is called “street name”), your broker, bank or other nominee will send you instructions for voting those shares. Many (but not all) brokerage firms, banks and other nominees participate in a program provided through Broadridge that offers Internet and telephone voting options. |
Q:
| If I vote by proxy, can I still access the Annual Meeting and vote there if I choose? |
A:
| Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, the method you use to vote will not limit your right to vote at the virtual Annual Meeting if you decide to participate. As indicated, we are hosting the Annual Meeting exclusively online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HUBG2023. There will be no physical location at which stockholders may attend the Annual Meeting, but stockholders may attend and participate in the meeting electronically. Stockholders who participate in the virtual Annual Meeting will be deemed to be present in person and will be able to vote during the Annual Meeting at the times that the polls are open. Stockholders who wish to attend the meeting should go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HUBG2023 at least 10 minutes before the beginning of the meeting to register their attendance and complete the verification procedures to confirm that they were stockholders of record as of March 29, 2023. The Notice |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
includes instructions on how the shares of Class B Common Stock will be voted on matters presented atto participate in the Annual Meeting. Under the Stockholders’ Agreement, if there is a deadlock among Class B Stockholders or if a quorum of Class B Stockholders cannot be achieved at the meeting of Class B Stockholders after two attempts, each Class B Stockholder has agreedMeeting and how to vote your shares by accessing the virtual Annual Meeting via the Internet. You will need to enter the 16-digit control number received with your proxy card or causeNotice to be voted all of its shares of Class Benter the Annual Meeting via the online web portal.
Q:
| If my shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee, may I still access the Annual Meeting? |
A:
| Yes. Beneficial owners whose stock is held for them in street name by their brokers or other nominees may also attend the meeting by going to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HUBG2023 at least 10 minutes before the beginning of the meeting to register their attendance and complete the verification procedures to confirm that they were stockholders as of the record date. |
A:
| Yes. You will be able to submit questions live during the meeting by accessing the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HUBG2023, typing your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and clicking “Submit.” Only questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting. |
Q:
| Is cumulative voting allowed? Do I have dissenters’ or appraisal rights? |
A:
| No. Cumulative voting rights are not authorized, and dissenters’ rights and rights of appraisal are not applicable to the matters being voted upon at the Annual Meeting. |
Q:
| What are “broker votes” and “broker non-votes”? |
A:
| On certain “routine” matters, brokerage firms have discretionary authority under applicable stock exchange rules to vote their customers’ shares if their customers do not provide voting instructions. When a brokerage firm votes its customers’ shares on a routine matter without receiving voting instructions (referred to as a “broker vote”), these shares are counted both for establishing a quorum to conduct business at the Annual Meeting and in determining the number of shares voted “FOR” or “AGAINST” the “routine” matter. For purposes of the Annual Meeting, Proposal 4 – the ratification of the appointment of E&Y as our independent registered public accountants for 2023 is considered a “routine” matter. |
Under applicable stock as recommended by the independent directors of the Board of Directors. On March 17, 2017, the independent directors resolved that in the event of a deadlock or if a quorum cannot be achieved at the meeting of Class B Stockholders after two attempts, the independent directors unanimously recommend that the Class B Stockholders vote FORexchange rules, Proposal 1 – the election of each nominee for director named in Proposal 1, FOR the approval of the Company’s executive compensation indirectors, Proposal 2 ONE YEAR for– the advisory (non-binding) vote on the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (“say-on-pay” vote), Proposal 3 – the advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executiveregarding the compensation inof our Named Executive Officers (“say-on-frequency” vote), and Proposal 3, FOR the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in Proposal 4 and FOR5 – the approval of the Company’s 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan inCharter Amendment are considered “non-routine” matters for which brokerage firms do not have discretionary authority to vote their customers’ shares if their customers did not provide voting instructions. Therefore, for purposes of the Annual Meeting, if you hold your stock through a brokerage account, your brokerage firm may not vote your shares on your behalf on Proposal 1, 2, 3 or 5 without receiving instructions from you. When a brokerage firm does not have the authority to vote its customers’ shares or does not exercise its authority, these situations are referred to as “broker non-votes.” Broker non-votes are only counted for establishing a quorum and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on Proposals 1, 2 and 3. Broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against Proposal 5.
We encourage you to provide instructions to your brokerage firm, bank or other nominee by voting your proxy. This action ensures your shares will be voted at the Annual Meeting on all matters up for consideration.
Q:
| What if I abstain from voting? |
A:
| You have the option to “ABSTAIN” from voting with respect to Proposal 2 – the advisory (non-binding) vote on the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (“say-on-pay”), Proposal 3 – the advisory (non-binding) vote on the frequency of advisory votes regarding the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (“say-on-frequency”), Proposal 4 – the ratification of the appointment of E&Y as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for 2022 and Proposal 5 – the approval of the Charter Amendment. Abstentions with respect to these proposals are counted for purposes of establishing a quorum. If a quorum is present, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against these proposals. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Q:
| May I revoke my proxy after I have delivered my proxy? |
A:
| Yes. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the polls close by submitting a subsequent proxy with a later date by using the Internet, by telephone or by mail or by sending our Corporate Secretary a written revocation. Your proxy also will be considered revoked if you attend the Annual Meeting and vote via the virtual portal. If your shares are held in “street name” by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to change your vote or obtain a proxy to vote your shares if you wish to cast your vote during the virtual Annual Meeting. |
Q:
| How will my shares be voted if I return my proxy card or vote via telephone or Internet? What if I return my proxy card but do not provide voting instructions or complete the telephone or Internet voting procedures but do not specify how I want to vote my shares? |
A:
| Our Board of Directors has named Phillip D. Yeager, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Brian Alexander, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, and Thomas P. LaFrance, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, as official proxy holders. They will vote all proxies, or record an abstention or withholding, in accordance with the directions on the proxy. |
All shares represented by properly executed proxies, unless previously revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting as you direct.
IF YOU SIGN AND RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD BUT GIVE NO DIRECTION OR COMPLETE THE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET VOTING PROCEDURES BUT DO NOT SPECIFY HOW YOU WANT TO VOTE YOUR SHARES, THE SHARES WILL BE VOTED “FOR ALL” OF THE PERSONS NAMED HEREIN AS DIRECTORS; “FOR” THE PROPOSAL REGARDING AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (“SAY-ON-PAY”); FOR A FREQUENCY OF “ONE YEAR” FOR THE PROPOSAL REGARDING THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (“SAY-ON-FREQUENCY”); “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF E&Y AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR 2023; AND “FOR” THE PROPOSAL APPROVING THE CHARTER AMENDMENT.
Q:
| Who will count the votes? |
A:
| A representative of Broadridge has been appointed as an inspector of elections for the Annual Meeting. That person will tabulate votes cast by proxy or during the Annual Meeting as well as determine whether a quorum is present. |
Q:
| Where can I find voting results of the Annual Meeting? |
A:
| We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish final results on a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting (a copy of which will be available on the “Investors” section of our website, www.hubgroup.com, under the link “SEC Filings”). If our final voting results are not available within four business days after the Annual Meeting, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting the preliminary voting results and subsequently file the final voting results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days after the final voting results are known to us. |
Q:
| May I propose actions for consideration at the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or nominate individuals to serve as directors? |
A:
| You may submit proposals for consideration at future stockholder meetings, including director nominations. Please see “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Can stockholders recommend or nominate directors?” and “STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2024 ANNUAL MEETING” for more details. |
The Board of Directors knows of no matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in the Notice of 20172023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders enclosed herewith. However, if any other matters do come before the meeting,Annual Meeting, it is intended that the holders of the proxies will vote thereon in their discretion. Any such other matter will require for its approval the affirmative vote of a majority of votes votes.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
cast by shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at such Annual Meeting, provided a quorum is present, or such greater vote as may be required under the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company’s Bylaws or applicable law. A list
Q:
| Whom should I contact with questions about the Annual Meeting? |
A:
| If you have any questions about this Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting, please contact Thomas P. LaFrance, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, at 2001 Hub Group Way, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523 or by telephone at (630) 271-3600. |
Q:
| What information is available on the Internet? |
A:
| A copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting, our Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 and the proxy card or voting instructions are available for download free of charge at www.proxyvote.com. |
Additionally, our website address is www.hubgroup.com, which is used to distribute important Company information. At the “Investors” tab of stockholdersour website (under the link “SEC Filings”), we make available, free of charge, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 and any amendments to those reports as soon as practicable after they are electronically filed with the SEC.
Information from our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Statements in this proxy statement that are not historical may express or imply projections of revenues or expenditures, statements of plans and objectives or future operations or statements of future economic performance. Forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain and subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that might cause the actual performance of Hub Group, Inc. to differ materially from those expressed or implied by this discussion and, therefore, should be viewed with caution. All forward-looking statements and information are provided pursuant to the safe harbor established under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and should be evaluated in the context of these factors. Forward-looking statements generally may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “trends”, “assumptions”, “target”, “guidance”, “outlook”, “opportunity”, “future”, “plans”, “goals”, “objectives”, “expects”, “expected”, “anticipates”, “may”, “will”, “would”, “could”, “intend”, “believe”, “potential”, “projected”, “estimate” (or the negative or derivative of each of these terms), or similar words, and include our statements regarding our outlook, profit improvement initiatives and capital expenditures. These statements are based on Hub Group’s current beliefs and expectations of future events or future results, and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict and subject to change. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, among other things; general or regional economic conditions, including inflation and changes in trade policy, the effect of the record date will be available for inspection atongoing COVID-19 pandemic (including any spikes, outbreaks or variants of the Annual Meetingvirus) and for a period of ten days priorany future government actions taken in response to the pandemic on our business operations and general economic and financial market conditions; governmental or regulatory requirements affecting tax, wage and hour matters, health and safety, labor and employment, insurance or other areas; shipping and intermodal costs and prices, the integration of acquisitions and expenses relating thereto; driver shortages; the amount and timing of strategic investments or divestitures by Hub Group; the failure to implement and integrate critical information technology systems; cyber security incidents; and retail and other customers encountering adverse economic conditions. Except as required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligations to publicly update any forward-looking statements whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements, in addition to those described in detail under Item 1A “Risk Factors,” of our most recent Annual Meeting atReport on Form 10-K filed with the Company’s offices in Oak Brook, Illinois.Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and our other filings with the SEC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROPOSAL 1:
ELECTIONELECTION OF DIRECTORSThe number of directors
What is the structure of the Company, as determinedBoard of Directors?
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation requires that our Board of Directors consist of 3 to 12 members, with the actual number set by the Board. The Board size is currently ten. Directors are elected by our stockholders on an annual basis.
How are directors identified and nominated?
Directors may be nominated by the Board of Directors or by stockholders as described below under Article III“Can stockholders recommend or nominate directors?” The Nominating and Governance Committee is responsible for identifying, evaluating and recommending qualified director candidates, including the director slate to be presented to stockholders at the Annual Meeting, to our Board, which makes the ultimate election or nomination determination, as applicable. The Nominating and Governance Committee may use a variety of methods to identify potential director candidates, such as recommendations by our directors, management, stockholders or third-party search firms. Neither the Company nor the Nominating and Governance Committee currently utilizes the services of any search firm to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.
Does the Board consider diversity when identifying director nominees?
Yes. The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to identify candidates who will provide a diversity of viewpoints, professional experience, education and skills that complement those already existing on the Board. In addition, in selecting directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the need to strengthen the Board by providing a diversity of persons in terms of their expertise, age, gender, race, ethnicity, education, and other attributes that contribute to the Board’s diversity. In performing its responsibilities for identifying, screening and recommending candidates to the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee (i) ensures that candidates with a diversity of backgrounds are included in any pool of candidates from which Board nominees are chosen and (ii) considers diverse candidates from nonexecutive corporate positions and non-traditional environments.
What are the backgrounds of the nominees?
As required by the NASDAQ listing standards, set forth below is information regarding our nominees’ self-identified gender and demographic backgrounds:
| | Board Diversity Matrix (As of April 4, 2023) | |
| | Total Number of Directors (including nominees) | | | 10 | |
| | | | | Female | | | Male | |
| | Part I: Gender Identity | |
| | Directors | | | 3 | | | 7 | |
| | Part II: Demographic Background | |
| | African American or Black | | | 1 | | | | |
| | White | | | 2 | | | 7 | |
How are nominees evaluated; what are the threshold qualifications?
The Nominating and Governance Committee is charged with recommending to our Board only those candidates that it believes are qualified to serve as Board members consistent with the criteria for selection of new directors adopted from time to time by the Board.
In determining a candidate’s suitability for consideration for membership on the Board, the Nominating and Governance Committee reviews all proposed nominees for the Board, including those proposed by stockholders, in accordance with the mandate contained in its charter. The Nominating and Governance Committee assesses a candidate’s independence, background, and experience, as well as our current Board’s skill needs. With respect to incumbent directors considered for re-election, the Nominating and Governance Committee also assesses each
TABLE OF CONTENTS
director’s meeting attendance record and suitability for continued service. In addition, the Nominating and Governance Committee determines whether nominees are in a position to devote an adequate amount of time to the effective performance of director duties and possess the following threshold characteristics: informed judgment, integrity and accountability, record of achievement, understanding of the Company’s Bylaws, is currently seven. Thebusiness or other related industries, a cooperative approach, loyalty, the ability to consult with and advise management, and such other factors as the Nominating and Governance Committee determines are relevant considering the needs of the Board of Directors has decidedand the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee recommends candidates, including those submitted by stockholders, only if it believes a candidate’s knowledge, experience, and expertise would strengthen the Board and that the candidate is committed to expandrepresenting the numberlong-term interests of all Hub Group stockholders.
Who are the nominees this year?
All nominees for election as directors at the Annual Meeting were nominated by the Board of Directors for election by stockholders at the Annual Meeting upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Our nominees consist of the seven incumbent directors who were elected at the 2022 annual meeting of stockholders and each of Gary Yablon and Lisa Dykstra, who were appointed by the Board to eight,join effective uponMay 24, 2022, and Phillip D. Yeager, who was appointed by the Board of Directors to join effective January 1, 2023. Our Board believes that each of the eight nominees receiving a pluralitycan devote an adequate amount of votes cast attime to the 2017 Annual Meeting. Eacheffective performance of director shallduties and possesses all of the threshold qualifications identified above.
If elected, each nominee would hold office until
the 2024 Annual Meeting or until his
or her successor is elected and qualified or until his
or her earlier death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal.
The
following lists the nominees,
for whomtheir ages at the
encloseddate of this proxy
is intended to be voted are set forth below. Mr. Yeager, Mr. Maltby, Mr. Eppen, Mr. Kenny, Mr. Reaves, Mr. Slarkstatement, and
Mr. Ward each currently serves asthe calendar year in which they first became a director,
of the Company. Mr. Peter B. McNitt is being nominated by the Board for the first time. The descriptions below discussalong with their biographies and the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that
qualifyled the Board to conclude that each nominee
toshould serve
on the Company’sas a member of our Board of Directors.
It is not contemplated that any of these nominees will be unavailable for election, but if such a situation should arise, the proxy will be voted in accordance with the best judgment of the proxyholder for such person or persons as may be designated by the Board of Directors unless the stockholder has directed otherwise.Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors at the Annual Meeting, provided a quorum is present. Withholding of authority to vote in the election and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the election, provided a quorum is present. Stockholders are not allowed to cumulate their votes in the election of directors.
Nominees for Election as Directors
David P. Yeager
Committees:
None | | 64 | 70 | | | David P. Yeager haswas appointed Executive Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2023. Mr. Yeager served as the Company’s Chairman of the Board since November 2008 and served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company sincefrom March 1995.1995 until December 31, 2022. Mr. Yeager was Vice Chairman of the Board from March 1995 through November 2008. From October 1985 through December 1991, Mr. Yeager was President of our predecessor, Hub Chicago. From 1983 to October 1985, he served as Vice President, Marketing of Hub Chicago. Mr. Yeager started working for the Company in 1975. Mr. Yeager received a Masters in Business Administration degree from the University of Chicago in 1987 and a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Dayton in 1975. |
| | | | |
| | | | Dayton. Mr. Yeager is the father of Mr. Phillip D. Yeager.
Mr. Yeager formerly served as the Chair of the University of Dayton Board of Trustees. He has been an employee of the Company for over 40 years and in that time has helped grow the Company from a small family business into the $3.6over $5 billion enterprise it is today. Mr. Yeager has experience in all aspects of the business, including acting as founder and President of both the Pittsburgh Hub (1975) and the St. Louis Hub (1980). Mr. Yeager’s industry experience and Company knowledge make him uniquely suited to serve as our Chairman of the Board. |
| | | | | | |
Donald G. MaltbyPhillip D. Yeager
Committees:
None | | 62 | 36 | Donald G. Maltby | | Phillip D. Yeager was appointed a director effective January 1, 2023 in connection with his assumption of the role of President and Chief Executive Officer on January 1, 2023. Prior to this appointment, Mr. Yeager served as President and Chief Operating Officer since July 2019, and as Chief Commercial Officer overseeing Intermodal and |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | Truck Brokerage operations as well as sales, pricing, solutions and account management since January 2018. Mr. Yeager formerly held the role of Executive Vice President, Account Management and Intermodal Operations since January 2016 after serving as Vice President of Account Management and Business Development from February 2014 to January 2016. Mr. Yeager joined the Company in 2011 as the Director of Strategy and Acquisitions. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Yeager served as Assistant Vice President of Commercial Banking at BMO Harris Bank, and as an investment banking analyst for Lazard Freres & Co. Mr. Yeager earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from Trinity College and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Mr. Yeager is the son of David P. Yeager.
Mr. Phillip D. Yeager’s deep knowledge of many aspects of the Company’s operations, having served in a wide variety of roles and serving now as President and Chief Executive Officer, brings to the Board a critical operational and strategic perspective in support of its oversight obligations. |
| | | | | | |
Peter B. McNitt
Committees:
Audit (Chair)
Compensation
Nominating and
Governance | | | 68 | | | Peter B. McNitt has served as a director of the Company since 2016.May 2017 and as our Lead Independent Director since November 2019. Mr. Maltby was appointedMcNitt, currently retired, most recently served as Vice Chair of BMO Harris Bank, N.A. until December 2018. Prior to this position, Mr. McNitt held many leadership roles within BMO Harris, including Senior Vice President and Chief Operating OfficerHead of the Company in September 2015. From January 2015 until September 2015,Emerging Majors Midwest, Executive Vice President of U.S. Corporate Banking, Executive Managing Director of U.S. Investment Banking, and Vice Chair of Business Banking. Mr. Maltby servedMcNitt currently serves as an advisora director of Old Republic International Corporation (Insurance), where he is a member of the audit committee and compensation committee. He is a graduate of Amherst College and has attended Northwestern University’s Graduate School of Management and the Graduate School of Credit and Finance at Stanford University.
As a director, Mr. McNitt brings over 40 years of financial expertise assessing corporate strategies, financial performance, management succession and risk, as well a great deal of public company board experience. In addition to his role as our Lead Director, Mr. McNitt utilizes his financial expertise as Chair of our Audit Committee to help oversee and provide guidance on the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Maltby served as Chief Strategy Officer from May 2014 until January 2015. Prior to that, Mr. Maltby served as Chief Supply Chain Officer from January 2011 to May 2014. From February 2004 to December 2010, Mr. Maltby served as Executive Vice President- Logistics Services. Mr. Maltby previously served as President of Hub Online, the Company’s e-commerce division, from February 2000 through January 2004. Mr. Maltby also served as President of Hub Cleveland from July 1990 through January 2000internal controls and from April 2002 to January 2004. Prior to joining Hub Group, Mr. Maltby served as President of Lyons Transportation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sherwin Williams Company, from 1988 to 1990. In his career at Sherwin Williams, which began in 1981 and continued until he joined the Company in 1990, Mr. Maltby held a variety of management positions including Vice-President of Marketing and Sales for its Transportation Division. Mr. Maltby received a Masters in Business Administration from Baldwin Wallace College in 1982 and a Bachelor of Science degree from the State University of New York in 1976.financial practices. |
| | | | | | |
Mary H. Boosalis
Committees:
Audit
Compensation
Nominating and
Governance (Chair) | | | 68 | Mr. Maltby has been in the transportation and logistics industry since 1976, holding various executive and management positions. He has steadily assumed additional responsibility and has been instrumental in growing the Company’s logistics business since joining the Company over 25 years ago. Mr. Maltby’s strategic thinking and deep knowledge of the logistics industry, as well as familiarity with the Company’s business and culture, make him a valuable contributor to the Board. |
Name | | Age | | Business Experience During the Past Five Years
and Other Information
|
Gary D. Eppen
| | 80
| | Gary D. Eppen
Mary H. Boosalis has served as a director of the Company since February 1996. Currently retired, Mr. EppenMay 2018. From 2017 to 2022, she served as President and CEO of Premier Health, the largest health system in southwest Ohio. Ms. Boosalis served as President of Premier Health and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for the organization from 2013 to 2017. Ms. Boosalis joined the health system in 1986, progressively expanding her leadership roles, including five years as President and CEO of Miami Valley Hospital.
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | Ms. Boosalis is a past diplomat of the American College of Healthcare Executives, a member of the Ohio Hospital Association Board and a member of the Greater Dayton Area Hospital Association Boards. She is the immediate past Chair of the University of Dayton Board of Trustees. Additionally, she has been a member of the Dayton Chamber of Commerce Board, the Dayton Business Committee, the Dayton Development Committee, the Dayton Minority Inclusion Committee and the Learn to Earn Board. Ms. Boosalis has been named to the Top 10 Women list by the Dayton Daily News, as an Ohio Most Powerful and Influential Woman by the Ohio Diversity Council, and as a Woman of Influence by the Dayton YWCA. In 2022, Ms. Boosalis was recognized as the RalphDayton Business Person of the Year. Ms. Boosalis earned a Bachelor’s degree in Nursing, magna cum laude, from California State University at Fresno and Dorothy Keller Distinguished Service Professora Master’s degree in Health Services Administration, magna cum laude, from Arizona State University.
In her capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Operations ManagementPremier Health, Ms. Boosalis has gained valuable executive experience in all aspects of business. Having served on numerous civic committees and Deputy Deanboards, Ms. Boosalis is able to advise best practices across different industries. |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Lisa Dykstra
Committees:
Audit
Compensation
Nominating and
Governance | | | 52 | | | Lisa Dykstra has served as a director of Hub Group since May 2022. Ms. Dykstra serves as the Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer for part-time programsAnn & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital, a position she has held since 2015. She has spent much of her nearly thirty-year information technology career in leadership positions at Thethe country’s top academic medical centers including the University of Chicago Booth SchoolMedicine, Rush University Medical Center, and Northwestern Memorial Hospital. Ms. Dykstra’s career focus is to drive healthcare delivery transformation and value, including through applications, digital health, information and cyber security, and technology programs. She is an award-winning CIO, being named Enterprise CIO of Business. Hethe Year 2019 and winning a Chicago Orbie award. She is actively involved on several community and industry boards, including Erie Family Health, the InspireCIO/Chicago CIO Leadership Association and the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives. Ms. Dykstra has served on the American Heart Association — Go Red For Women Board since 2016. She received a Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University in 1964, a Master of Science in Industrial Engineering from the University of Minnesota in 1960, a Bachelor of ScienceArts in Communications from DePaul University.
Ms. Dykstra’s experience leading technology and information systems at some of the University of Minnesotacountry’s leading hospital adds to the Board substantial expertise and knowledge in 1959information technology, privacy, data governance and an Associate in Arts degree in Pre-Engineering from Austin Junior College in 1956. He received an Honorary Doctor of Economics degree fromcybersecurity, which are critical to the Stockholm School of Economics in 1998.Company’s competitive advantage, growth initiatives, and risk management. |
| | | | | | |
Michael E.
Flannery
Committees:
Audit
| | | 63 | Mr. Eppen’s experience with operations management has been valuable as the Company has evolved from a collection of small businesses to a unified network with a significant fleet of containers and a large drayage network. Mr. Eppen’s attention to detail and familiarity with financial matters make him an effective Chair of our Audit Committee. Until February 2007, Mr. Eppen served as a Director of Landauer, Inc. Mr. Eppen has used his vast experience to help the Board identify and implement best practices. Mr. Eppen brings a wealth of both academic and business experience to his service as a Director. |
| | | | | |
Charles R. Reaves | | 78 | | Charles R. ReavesMichael E. Flannery has served as a director of the Company since February 1996. Since 1994,April 2022. Mr. Reaves has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Reaves Enterprises, Inc., a real estate development company. From April 1962 until November 1994, Mr. Reaves worked for Sears Roebuck & Company in various positions, ultimately as President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears Logistics Services, Inc., a transportation, distribution and home delivery subsidiary of Sears Roebuck & Company. Mr. Reaves received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Arkansas State University in 1961. |
| | | | |
| | | | Having served for 32 years as an executive at Sears, Mr. Reaves understands the needs of large shippers and retailers. In his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Sears Logistics Services, Inc., Mr. Reaves gained valuable executive experience running a large transportation organization. Mr. Reaves has used this experience, as well as his industry knowledge, to effectively advise the Company in his role as a Director. As Chair of our Nominating and Governance Committee, Mr. Reaves has also used his experience at Sears to help shape the Company’s Governance Policies and oversee the succession planning process. |
| | | | |
Martin P. Slark | | 62 | | Martin P. Slark has served as a director of the Company since February 1996 and Lead Director since November 2016. Since 1976, Mr. Slark has been employed by Molex Incorporated (“Molex”), a manufacturer of electronic, electrical and fiber optic interconnection products and systems. Mr. SlarkFlannery is presently the Chief Executive Officer of Molex and is also a Director of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., Northern Trust Corporation and Koch Industries. Mr. Slark is a Companion of the British Institute ofDuchossois Capital Management and received a Masters in Business Administration degree from the University of East London in 1993 and a Post-Graduate Diploma in Management Studies from Portsmouth University in 1981. |
| | | | |
| | | | As Chief Executive Officer of a multi-national company, Mr. Slark has extensive experience running a large organization. Mr. Slark, originally from England, has worked for Molex for over 40 years in Europe, Asia and the United States. Mr. Slark’s leadership skills, experience with strategic planning and contacts have been a significant benefit to the Board. In addition to his role as Lead Director, Mr. Slark is Chair of the Compensation Committee,(“DCM”), where he leads the firm and oversees its execution of its various investment strategies, a position he has been instrumental in helping formulate the compensation package for the Company’s executives. |
| | | | |
Jonathan P. Ward | | 62 | | Jonathan P. Ward has served as a director of the Companyheld since January 2012.May 2017. Mr. Ward is an operating partner at Kohlberg & Co. and has been with that company since July 2009. HeFlannery was previously chairman of the Chicago office of Lazard Ltd. and managing director, Lazard Freres & Co., LLC, joining Lazard in November 2006. Prior to Lazard, Mr. Ward was at The ServiceMaster Company for five years, where he began asappointed President and Chief Executive Officer in 2001 and then became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2002. From 1997 to 2001, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company, a commercial printing company. During his 23 years at R.R. Donnelley, he served in a variety of other leadership positions. He earned a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of New Hampshire and also has completed the Harvard Business School Advanced Management Program.Managing |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation
Nominating and
Governance | | | | | | Director of DCM at the time of its creation in November 2013. Mr. WardFlannery also served for fifteen years as the Chief Financial Officer of The Duchossois Group, the parent of DCM.
Earlier in his career, Mr. Flannery served as the Chief Executive Officer of Trinity Rail Group, LLC, a leading designer and manufacturer of rail cars for the North American and European markets, as Vice Chairman of Thrall Car, a predecessor company to Trinity Rail, and as Chief Administrative Officer of The Duchossois Group. Mr. Flannery began his career as a lawyer with the Chicago firm of Burke, Griffin, Chomicz and Wienke and served as Corporate Counsel for Cummins Inc. Mr. Flannery received his Bachelor of Science degree in Finance from the University of Illinois in Champaign, Illinois and his J.D. cum laude from Indiana University Maurer School of Law in Bloomington, Indiana.
Mr. Flannery is a member of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of SP Plus Corporation, where he serves asThe Chamberlain Group, Inc., Maritz, Inc., Energy Distribution Partners, Riverside Rail, the Board of Trustees at the Field Museum, the Board of Visitors for the Indiana University Maurer School of Law, and the Board of Directors of the Executives’ Club of Chicago. He is also a member of the Compensation Committee. Young Presidents’ Organization, the Economic Club of Chicago, and the Commercial Club of Chicago.
Mr. Ward previously served as a director of Hillshire Brands Company (and Sara Lee Corporation prior to their merger) from October 2005 to August 2014, as director of KAR Auction Services, Inc. from December 2009 to June 2014,Flannery’s extensive experience in executive roles across multiple sectors (including rail), his financial acumen, and as a director of United Stationers Inc. from July 2011 to June 2012. |
| | | | |
| | | | Mr. Ward’s service as an executive, combinedexperience with his leadership capabilities,mergers and acquisitions make him well qualified to be a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Having servedBased on numerous public company boards,his understanding of corporate investments, strategic planning, and operations, Mr. WardFlannery is well positioned to be able to advise asprovide valuable insights to best practices across multiple industries. In addition, as a member of the Compensation Committee of SP Plus Corporation, Mr. Ward brings unique insight into other compensation models and approaches. Mr. Ward’s experience and perspective make him a valuable member of the Company’s Board of Directors.Company. |
| | | | | | |
Committees:
Audit
Compensation
(Chair)
Nominating and
Governance | | 63 | 69 | | | James C. Kenny has served as a director of the Company since May 2016. Currently retired, Mr. Kenny has served on the boardas a director of Kenny Industries, LLC, since 2006. Kenny Industries is a holding company that owns office and industrial parks in northern Illinois and a luggage company, among other assets. SinceFrom 2011 until April 2020, Mr. Kenny has also served as a director of Kerry Group, PLC, a public company traded on the London and Dublin stock exchanges with a market capitalization of 13 billion euro.exchanges. Mr. Kenny servesserved as a member of Kerry Group’s Nominatingnominating and Compensation Committees. |
| | | | |
| | | | compensation committees and was Chair of the committee to select a new chairman of the Kerry Group during his time as a director.
Mr. Kenny served as Executive Vice President and Director of Kenny Construction Company from 1994 until the company was sold in 2012. He also served as President of Kenny Management Services from 2006 to 2012. Kenny Construction Company, founded in 1927, was involved in building projects across the United States and Kenny Management Services oversaw large, complex construction projects such as the Chicago Midway Airport expansion and the Chicago Bears’ stadium renovation. From 2003 until 2006, Mr. Kenny served as United States Ambassador to Ireland. Mr. Kenny received his Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from Bradley University. |
| | | | |
| | | |
Mr. Kenny has 35 yearsmore than three decades of business experience, in the construction industry, as well as three years of diplomatic experience serving as an ambassador. He |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | | | has extensive experience running a family business and serving on its board. As a director, he has been involved in acquisition strategy, succession planning, unionlabor relations and governance. He also has excellent political knowledge of politics and a large network, both locally and nationally, which is a great asset for a company in a regulated industry.nationally. Mr. Kenny brings a unique blend of experiences to the Board of Directors.Board. |
| | | | | | |
Peter B. McNittJenell R. Ross
Committees:
Audit
Compensation
Nominating and
Governance | | 62 | 53 | Peter B. McNitt | | Jenell R. Ross is being nominated to the Board forPresident of the Bob Ross Auto Group in Centerville, Ohio, a position she has held since 1997. Today, the dealership includes three franchises – Buick, GMC and Mercedes-Benz. The company’s Mercedes-Benz dealership was the first time. Mr. McNittAfrican-American owned Mercedes-Benz dealership in the world. Ms. Ross is the sole second-generation African-American female automobile dealer in the country. Under her leadership, the Bob Ross franchises have continued to rank as leaders in Buick, GMC and Mercedes-Benz sales and customer service.
Ms. Ross is an active member of her community, having served on the boards of numerous foundations and community service organizations. She currently serves as Vice Chair of BMO Harris Bank. Prior to his current position, Mr. McNitt held many leadership roles within BMO, including Senior Vice President and Head of the Emerging Majors Midwest, Executive Vice President of U.S. Corporate Banking, Executive Managing Director of U.S. Investment Banking, and Vice Chair of Business Banking. Mr. McNitt currently serves as a director of Titan International, Inc, where he is a member of the University of Dayton Board of Trustees and previously was the Chair of the board of directors of the Federal Reserve Board of Cleveland (Cincinnati branch). Additionally, she serves as a Board Member for the Minority Business Partnership through the Dayton Chamber of Commerce and a Board Member of the Will Allen Foundation. She has previously served on the Ohio Motor Vehicle Dealers Board and as Chair (2013) of the American International Automobile Dealers Association, a dealer-led organization representing more than 10,000 automobile dealer franchises. Ms. Ross has been recognized with numerous awards with respect to business achievements and public service. She earned a Bachelor’s degree from Emory University in Atlanta.
In her capacity as President of the Bob Ross Auto Group and her participation in other related groups, Ms. Ross has gained valuable executive and leadership experience in all aspects of business. Having served on numerous civic committees and boards, Ms. Ross is able to advise on best practices across different industries. Having served governmental agencies, she also is able to advise on interactions with regulators and governmental bodies. |
| | | | | | |
Martin P. Slark
Committees:
Audit
Compensation
Nominating and
Governance | | | 68 | | | Martin P. Slark has served as a director of the Company since February 1996 and served as our Lead Independent Director from November 2016 until November 2019. Mr. Slark was most recently employed by Molex Incorporated (“Molex”), a manufacturer of electronic, electrical and fiber optic interconnection products and systems, serving as its Chief Executive Officer from 2005 until his retirement in November 2018. Mr. Slark is a director of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc., where he is chair of the risk committee and Chairmansits on the executive and investment committees. Additionally, Mr. Slark is a director of Northern Trust Corporation. Mr. Slark is a Companion of the Corporate Governance committee. He is a graduate of Amherst College and has attended Northwestern University’s Graduate SchoolBritish Institute of Management and received a Masters in Business Administration degree from the Graduate SchoolUniversity of CreditEast London and Finance at Stanforda Post-Graduate Diploma in Management Studies from Portsmouth University.
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | | | |
| | | | |
As a former Chief Executive Officer of a multi-national company, Mr. McNittSlark has extensive experience running a large organization. Mr. Slark worked for Molex for over 40 years in Europe, Asia and the United States. Mr. Slark’s leadership skills, experience with strategic planning and contacts have been a significant benefit to the Board. |
| | | | | | |
Gary Yablon
Committees:
Audit
Compensation
Nominating and
Governance | | | 60 | | | Gary Yablon has served as a director of Hub Group since May 2022. From 2004 to 2022 Mr. Yablon served as a Managing Partner at Impala Asset Management, an investment management firm. Mr. Yablon’s investment expertise includes securities analysis and portfolio management across industries with a focus on global transportation/industrials and logistics. Prior to Impala, he was a Managing Director at Credit Suisse First Boston responsible for all freight transportation and logistics equity research. Earlier in his career, Mr. Yablon worked at Schroder Wertheim as a Managing Director overseeing transportation related equity research and at Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Mr. Yablon was recognized by Institutional Investor Magazine as the number one transportation analyst in one or more of the Railroads, Trucking, Airfreight, or Ground Transportation sectors for eight years in a row. In 2010 he was named to the Institutional Investor Hall of Fame. Mr. Yablon received a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Emory University and a Masters in Business Administration from New York University.
Mr. Yablon brings extensive industry knowledge to the Board, having formerly served as an analyst covering the transportation and logistics sectors, which provides critical support to the Board’s oversight and direction of the Company’s strategy and performance. Mr. Yablon’s long career in the financial expertise assessing corporate strategies,sector also brings to the Board a keen sense of investor relations and adds to the Board’s ability to oversee the Company’s financial performance management succession and risk. He would add a great deal of public company board experience, as well as financial expertise, to the Board.reporting. |
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that the
Can stockholders
vote FOR ALL the nominees presented in Proposal 1.recommend or nominate directors?
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the full Board of Directors met four times at regularly scheduled meetings and four times at special meetings. The Audit Committee met eight times at regularly scheduled meetings. The Compensation Committee met two times and theYes. Stockholders may recommend candidates to our Nominating and Governance Committee met twice. During 2016, all directors attended at least 90% ofby providing the meetings ofsame information within the Board of Directors and the committees thereof on which they served. The Company encourages each member of the Board of Directors to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. All directors attended the Company’s 2016 annual meeting of stockholders held on May 6, 2016.
Audit Committee
The duties of the Audit Committee are to oversee the Company’s internal control structure and review the Company’s financial statements and other financial information to be included in the Company’s 10-K. Additionally the Audit Committee is responsiblesame deadlines required for the selection, compensation and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors and review of the Company’s annual audit plan. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Eppen (Chair), Kenny, Reaves, Slark and Ward. If Mr. McNitt is elected at the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors intends to appoint himnominating candidates pursuant to the Audit Committee. The Auditadvance notice provisions in our Bylaws discussed below. Our Nominating Committee haswill consider such candidates and apply the same evaluation criteria to them as it applies to other director candidates.
Whether recommending a
written charter which is available on the Company’s website atwww.hubgroup.com and it annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter.The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Eppen, Kenny, McNitt, Reaves, Slark and Ward are “independent” in accordance with the applicable corporate governance listing standards of NASDAQ. See the section “Director Independence Determinations” below for further details. The Board of Directors has determined that the Audit Committee does not have an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in the regulations promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, the Board of Directors has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee are ablecandidate to read and understand fundamental financial statements within the meaning of the Audit Committee requirements of NASDAQ and that at least one of its members has the financial sophistication required by NASDAQ. The Board of Directors has determined that by satisfying the requirements of the NASDAQ listing standards with a member of the Audit Committee that has the requisite “financial sophistication” qualifications, the Audit Committee has the financial expertise necessary to fulfill the duties and the obligations of the Audit Committee. The Board of Directors has concluded that the appointment of an “audit committee financial expert” is not necessary at this time.
CompensationCommittee
The Compensation Committee is responsible for providing assistance to the Board in the discharge of its responsibilities relating to compensation and development of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. The members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Eppen, Kenny, Reaves, Slark (Chair) and Ward. If Mr. McNitt is elected at the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors intends to appoint him to the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee reviews, adopts, terminates, amends or recommends to the Board the adoption, termination or amendment of equity-based employee plans, incentive compensation plans and employee benefit plans, as further described in the Compensation Committee Charter. The Compensation Committee used Korn Ferry Hay Group (“Hay Group”) as its compensation consultant in 2016 to assist in the evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer and executive officer compensation. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain and terminate any compensation consultant and to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee has a written charter which is available on the Company’s website atwww.hubgroup.com and it annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter.
Nominating and Governance Committee
The duties of theour Nominating and Governance Committee are to identify individuals qualified to become Board members and recommend theor nominating a director nominees to the Board for the next annual meeting of stockholders, assist the Board with succession planning and develop and recommend to the Board the corporate governance guidelines and other corporate governance policies applicable to the Company. The members of the Nominating and Governance Committee are Messrs. Eppen, Kenny, Reaves (Chair), Slark and Ward. If Mr. McNitt is elected at the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors intends to appoint him to the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Nominating and Governance Committee has a written charter which is available on the Company’s website atwww.hubgroup.com and it annually reviews and assesses the adequacy of its charter.
Nominations of Directors
Directors may be nominated by the Board of Directors or by stockholders in accordance with the Bylaws. As a matter of course, the Nominating and Governance Committee will review the qualifications of various persons to determine whether they might make good candidates for consideration for membership on the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee will review all proposed nominees for the Board of Directors, including those proposed by stockholders, in accordance with the mandate contained in its charter. This will include a review of the person’s judgment, experience, independence, understanding of the Company’s business or other related industries and such other factors as the Nominating and Governance Committee determines are relevant in light of the needs of the Board of Directors and the Company. The Nominating and Governance Committee will select qualified candidates and review its recommendations with the Board of Directors, which will decide whether to invite the candidate to be a nominee for election to the Board of Directors. The Nominating and Governance Committee seeks to obtain candidates who will provide a diversity of viewpoints, professional experience, education and skills that complement those already existing on the Board. In addition, in selecting directors, the Nominating and Governance Committee will consider the need to strengthen the Board by providing a diversity of persons in terms of their expertise, age, gender, race, ethnicity, education, and other attributes which contribute to the Board’s diversity. In performing its responsibilities for identifying, screening and recommending candidates to the Board, the Nominating & Governance Committee (i) ensures that candidates with a diversity of ethnicity and gender are included in any pool of candidates from which Board nominees are chosen, and (ii) considers diverse candidates from nonexecutive corporate positions and non-traditional environments. The Company has not paid a fee to any third party to identify or assist in identifying or evaluating potential nominees.
If a stockholder desires to nominate persons for election as directors,stockholders, timely written notice must be given and received in advance of the stockholder meeting, by theour Corporate Secretary of the Company at 2000 Clearwater Drive,2001 Hub Group Way, Oak Brook, IL 60523, either by personal delivery or by United States mail. Pursuant to the Bylaws, such notice must be receivedmail, not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of stockholders or, between(between February 9, 201825, 2024 and March 11, 2018, for26, 2024, in the 2018case of the 2024 Annual Meeting;Meeting), provided, however, that inif the event that themeeting date of the 2018 Annual Meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from the first anniversary of the 2017 Annual Meeting, theprior year’s annual meeting, timely written notice must be given and received no earlierby our Corporate Secretary not more than the 90th day90 days prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business ofon the later of (i)(1) the 60th60th day prior to such annual meeting or (ii)(2) the 10th10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Each notice must describe the nomination in sufficient detail for the nomination to be summarized on the agenda for the meeting and must set forth: (i) the name and address,forth those items as it appears on the books of the Company, of the stockholder making the nomination, (ii) a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock in the Company entitled to vote at the annual meeting of stockholders and intends to appear in person orrequired by proxy at the meeting to present the nomination, (iii) a statement of the class and number of shares beneficially owned by the stockholder, (iv) the name and address of any person to be nominated, (v) a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder and each nominee and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the stockholder, (vi) such other information regarding such nominee proposed by such stockholder as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and (vii) the consent of such nominee to serve as a director of the Company if elected.our Bylaws. The presiding officer of the annual meetingAnnual Meeting of stockholders will, if the facts warrant, refuse to acknowledge a nomination not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure, and any such nomination not properly brought before the meeting will not be considered.
Leadership
StructureTABLE OF CONTENTS
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) no later than March 26, 2024.
You should consult our Bylaws, posted on the “Investor Information—Corporate Governance” section of our website located at www.hubgroup.com, for more detailed information regarding the process summarized above. No stockholder nominees have been submitted for this year’s annual meeting.
What if a nominee is unwilling or unable to serve?
We do not expect that any of the nominees will be unavailable for election, but if such a situation should arise, the persons designated as proxies on the proxy card are authorized to vote in accordance with their best judgment for such substitute person or persons as may be designated by the Board of Directors unless the stockholder has directed otherwise.
Are there any family relationships between any of the directors, executive officers or nominees?
Yes – Executive Chairman David P. Yeager’s son, Phillip D. Yeager, serves as our President and Chief Executive Officer.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote
FOR the election of each of the 10 director nominees named in this proxy statement.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
What governance practices are in place to promote effective independent Board leadership?
The Board of Directors has adopted several governance practices to promote effective independent Board leadership, such as:
Lead Independent Director
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that if the Chairman is an employee director, then the Board may select a Lead Independent Director from among the independent directors based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee. The Company is led by
David P.Phillip D. Yeager, who has served
in the roles of director and President and Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2023. Additionally, David P. Yeager, Phillip D. Yeager’s father, serves as
the Company’sExecutive Chairman of the Board
since November 2008of Directors and
served as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company since March 1995.from 1995 until December 31, 2022. The Board of Directors believes that
Mr. Yeager’sthe service
as both Chairman of
the BoardPhillip D. Yeager and
Chief Executive OfficerDavid P. Yeager is in the best interest of our Company and its stockholders because this leadership structure
has promoted continuity of leadership, promotes a unified vision for our Company, strengthens the ability of the CEO to develop and implement strategic initiatives and facilitates our Board’s efficient and effective functioning.
Recognizing the importance of having a strong independent board leadership structure to ensure accountability, Mr. McNitt has been designated by the Board as our Lead Independent Director. The Board believes having a Lead Independent Director is a valuable addition to our Board structure and facilitates the effective performance of the Board in its role providing governance and independent oversight.
Committee Structure; Annual Self-Evaluations and Board Succession Planning
The Board of Directors believes that
the members of the Boardit and
theits three standing Board Committees provide an appropriate framework for overseeing the Company’s management and operations and strike a sound balance with appropriate oversight. The
Company’sBoard and each standing committee annually perform self-evaluations using a process approved by the Nominating and Governance Committee. In addition, directors
bring a broad range of leadership experienceare asked to provide candid feedback on individual Board members to the
boardroom and regularly contribute to the thoughtful discussion involved in overseeing the affairsChairperson of the
Company.Nominating Committee or the Chairman of the Board, who then meet to discuss individual director performance and succession considerations and any necessary follow-up actions. The Board is collegial and all Board members are well engaged in their responsibilities.
The Company’s non-management directors regularly meet in executive session and typically these meetings are held in conjunction with a Board meeting. All Board members express their views and are open to the opinions expressed by other directors.
Regularly Scheduled Independent Director Sessions
The Company’s non-management directors regularly meet in executive session, typically in conjunction with Board recognizes the importance of having a strong independent board leadership structure to ensure accountability. The Board selectedmeetings. Mr. Slark to serveMcNitt, as Lead Independent Director, in November 2016. In February 2017,presides over all executive sessions of the Board revisednon-management independent directors.
Annual CEO Performance Evaluations
Each year, the Company’s Corporate Governance GuidelinesCompensation Committee meets to include that ifevaluate the Chairman is an employee Director, thenChief Executive Officer’s performance prior to making compensation decisions relative to the Board may select a Lead Director from among theCEO. All independent directors, based onincluding the recommendation ofLead Independent Director, are invited to provide input into this discussion.
What is the
Nominating and Governance Committee. The Board believes the appointment of a Lead Director is a valuable addition to our Board structure and will facilitate the effective performance of the BoardBoard’s role in
its role providing governance and independent oversight.Risk Oversight
risk oversight?
The Board of Directors, as a whole and at the committee level, is ultimately responsible for overseeing risk management at the Company. The Board has delegated certain of its risk oversight responsibilities to its committees, as described below. Each committee regularly reports to the Board regarding its risk management activities.
The Board has delegated to the Compensation Committee responsibility for oversight of risks relating to human capital matters, including our employee compensation risk. plans, policies, and programs.
The Board has delegated to the Audit Committee various risk management responsibilities. To fulfill these responsibilities at each quarterly meeting the Audit Committee receives (i) a report from the Director of Internal Audit regarding internal controls and an update on Internal Audit’s annual plan, (ii) a report from the General Counsel regarding any material litigation developments or regulatory risks, (iii) a report from the Company’s independent auditors, and (iv) a report from the President of Hub Group Trucking on driver safety. The Board also receives a report from the Chief Information Officer on cyber security risk. The Audit Committee reports the results of any material issuesrelated to the Board.financial, internal control, environmental, cybersecurity and litigation risks of the Company. The Board has also charged the Audit Committee with the responsibility for undertaking an annualperiodic comprehensive risk review, which includes a review of the steps taken by the Company to mitigate key risks. The list of risks is preparedidentified by management and discussed at an Audit Committee meeting.management. Any issues that arise from this discussion are then reviewed with the entire Board as necessary. The Audit Committee also receives an annual report from the General Counsel highlighting certain non-business risks and the processes used to mitigate those risks. The Audit Committee has implemented an Ethics Hotline that provides a completely anonymous and confidential way for employees, officers and directors to report accounting complaints and other unethical behavior. The General Counsel provides a quarterly report summarizing any complaints made through the Ethics Hotline to the Audit Committee.
The Board has chargeddelegated to the Nominating and Governance Committee withoversight of managing the risks related to succession planning. In addition to reports from
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Implicit in delegated oversight described above is the oversight of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters. The Board believes that the Audit CompensationCommittee oversees risk related to environmental matters, the compensation committee oversees risks related to social matters, including diversity and inclusion, and the Nominating and Governance Committees, the Board periodically discusses risk management issues as necessary. Committee oversees risks related to governance matters.
The risk oversight function is also supported by our Executive Chairman of the Board and our Chief Executive Officer, whose industry leadership, tenure and experience provide a deep understanding of the risks that the Company faces. Collectively, these processes are intended to provide the Board of Directors as a whole with an in-depth understanding of risks faced by the Company. The Board of Directors believes that this division of risk management responsibilities among the Executive Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, whoeach of whom has an integral role in our day-to-day risk management processes, together with the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and an experienced senior management team, provideeffectively addresses the appropriatematerial risks facing Hub Group. Our Board further believes that our leadership structure, described above, supports the risk oversight function of the Board as it allows our independent directors, through the three fully independent Board committees and in executive sessions of independent directors, to assistexercise effective oversight of management’s actions in identifying risks and implementing effective risk oversightmanagement policies and controls.
What functions are performed by the Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Governance Committees?
The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee, each with a Board-adopted written charter available on the “Investors—Corporate Governance” section of our website located at www.hubgroup.com. Current information regarding these committees is set forth below. In addition to the functions outlined below, each such committee performs an annual self-evaluation and periodically reviews and reassesses its charter.
| | AUDIT | | | | |
| | | | | Mr. McNitt (Chair)
Ms. Boosalis
Ms. Dykstra
Mr. Flannery
Mr. Kenny
Ms. Ross
Mr. Slark
Mr. Yablon | | | • Selects the independent auditor
• Annually evaluates the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance, and independence, as well as the lead audit partner; periodically considers the advisability of audit firm rotation; discusses the nature, scope and rigor of the audit process; and reviews the annual report on the independent auditor’s internal quality control procedures and any material issues raised by its most recent review of internal quality controls
• Pre-approves audit engagement fees and terms and all permitted non-audit services and fees, and discusses the audit scope and any audit problems or difficulties
• Discusses the annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements with management and the independent auditor
• Reviews with management and auditors the quality and adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting and establishes procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting or internal controls
• Discusses the types of information to be disclosed in earnings press releases
• Discusses policies governing the process by which risk assessment and risk management are undertaken
• Reviews internal audit activities, projects and budget
• Discusses with our General Counsel legal matters having an impact on financial statements
• Furnishes the committee report required in our proxy statement | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| | COMPENSATION | | | | |
| | | | | Mr. Kenny (Chair)
Mr. McNitt
Ms. Boosalis
Ms. Dykstra
Mr. Flannery
Ms. Ross
Mr. Slark
Mr. Yablon | | | • Reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to CEO compensation
• Determines executive officer compensation (including CEO and Executive Chairman compensation) and recommends Board compensation for Board approval
• Oversees overall compensation philosophy and principles
• Establishes short-term and long-term incentive compensation programs for executive officers
• Oversees stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements for Board members and executive officers
• Reviews and discusses disclosure regarding executive compensation, including Compensation Discussion and Analysis and compensation tables (in addition to preparing the report on executive compensation for our proxy statement)
• Selects and determines fees and scope of work of its compensation consultant
• Oversees and evaluates the independence of its compensation consultant and other advisors | |
| | NOMINATING AND
GOVERNANCE | | | | |
| | | | | Ms. Boosalis (Chair)
Mr. McNitt
Ms. Dykstra
Mr. Flannery
Mr. Kenny
Ms. Ross
Mr. Slark
Mr. Yablon | | | • Develops and recommends criteria for selecting new directors
• Identifies, screens and recommends to our Board individuals qualified to serve on our Board
• Recommends Board committee structure and membership, including the recommendation of a lead independent director
• Assists the Board with succession planning
• Develops, recommends and annually assesses Corporate Governance Guidelines and corporate governance practices and makes recommendations for changes to the Board
• Oversees the process governing annual Board, committee and director evaluations | |
Does Hub Group have an audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee?
Yes. Our Board has determined that Mr. McNitt is an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in the regulations promulgated under the Exchange Act. Additionally, the Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee are able to read and understand fundamental financial statements within the meaning of Nasdaq’s Audit Committee requirements. The SEC has determined that designation as an audit committee financial expert will not cause a person to be deemed to be an “expert” for any purpose.
How often did the Board and its committees meet in 2022?
During 2022, our Board, Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee met seven, ten, four and three times, respectively. During 2022, each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the total of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during the period for which he or she was a director and a member of each applicable committee.
What is Hub Group’s policy regarding Board member attendance at the Annual Meeting?
The Company encourages each member of the Board of Directors to attend each Annual Meeting of stockholders unless attendance is not feasible due to unavoidable circumstances. This year, because we are again holding a virtual Annual Meeting, no directors will be present in person but all are encouraged to access the virtual Annual Meeting. All persons serving as Board members at the time accessed the Company’s 2022 virtual annual meeting of stockholders.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Does Hub Group have a management succession plan?
Yes. Our Board of Directors ensures that a formalized process governs long-term management development and succession. Our Board formally reviews our management succession plan at least annually. Our comprehensive program encompasses not only our CEO but also other executive officers. The program focuses on key succession elements, including identification of potential successors for positions when it has been determined that internal succession is appropriate, together with an assessment of each potential successor’s level of readiness. In 2022, the Board, working with David P. Yeager, executed its succession plan and appointed Phillip D. Yeager, effective January 1, 2023, as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. In connection with Phillip D. Yeager’s appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, the Board appointed him a director and David P. Yeager will continue his service to the Company as Executive Chairman.
Are there share ownership guidelines and holding requirements for Board members and senior officers?
Yes. Details of our share ownership guidelines and holding requirements for Board members and senior officers are included in the Hub Group, Inc. Stock Ownership Guidelines. See “Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines” for more information on such ownership guidelines and holding requirements. Administrative details pertaining to these matters are established by the Compensation Committee.
Does the Company have a policy regarding hedging?
Yes – our policy prohibits Board members and executive officers from engaging in hedging transactions involving Hub Group securities, including forward sale or purchase contracts, equity swaps, collars or exchange funds. We view such transactions as speculative in nature and, therefore, creating the appearance that the transaction is based on material non-public information.
How can I communicate with the Board of Directors?
Stockholders may communicate directly with the Board of Directors. All communications should be directed to the Company’s Corporate Secretary at the address set forth in this Proxy Statement and should prominently indicate on the outside of the envelope that it is intended for the Board of Directors or for non-management directors. Each stockholder communication intended for the Board of Directors and received by the Corporate Secretary which is not otherwise commercial in nature will be forwarded to the specified party following its clearance through normal security procedures.
Where can I find more information about Hub Group’s corporate governance practices?
Our governance-related information is posted on www.hubgroup.com under “Investor Information— Corporate Governance,” including our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Amended and Restated Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the charter of each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the name of our lead independent director. This information is also available in print to any stockholder who sends a written request to: Investor Relations, Hub Group, Inc. 2001 Hub Group Way, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The following table and text summarizes the compensation earned by or paid to each person who served as a non-employee member of our Board of Directors during all or any part of 2022. Mr. David P. Yeager was not separately compensated for his service on the Board, and his executive compensation is discussed under “Executive Compensation” below. In addition, we reimburse directors for certain fees and expenses incurred in connection with continuing education seminars and for travel and expenses related to Hub Group business.
| | Mary H. Boosalis(2) | | | $100,000 | | | $200,070 | | | $300,070 | |
| | Lisa Dykstra(3) | | | $35,525 | | | $150,008 | | | $185,533 | |
| | Michael E. Flannery(3) | | | $50,000 | | | $150,029 | | | $200,029 | |
| | James C. Kenny | | | $100,000 | | | $200,070 | | | $300,070 | |
| | Peter B. McNitt | | | $100,000 | | | $200,070 | | | $300,070 | |
| | Charles R. Reaves(4) | | | $89,674 | | | $200,070 | | | $289,744 | |
| | Janell R. Ross | | | $100,000 | | | $200,070 | | | $300,070 | |
| | Martin P. Slark | | | $100,000 | | | $200,070 | | | $300,070 | |
| | Gary. Yablon(3) | | | $35,525 | | | $150,008 | | | $185,533 | |
| | Jonathan P. Ward(4) | | | $25,000 | | | $200,070 | | | $225,070 | |
(1)
| Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards in 2022 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Information about the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards is included in Note 14 of the annual consolidated financial statements in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2023. As of December 31, 2022, each of the directors listed in the table above had the following number of shares of restricted Class A Shares that were not vested: Ms. Boosalis (2,375), Ms. Dykstra (2,132), Mr. Flannery (2,139), Mr. Kenny (2,375), Mr. McNitt (2,375), Mr. Reaves (0), Ms. Ross (2,375), Mr. Slark (2,375), Mr. Yablon (2,132), and Mr. Ward (0). |
(2)
| Ms. Boosalis deferred $50,000 of her fees under the Company’s nonqualified deferred compensation plan (the “DCP”). |
(3)
| Mr. Flannery was appointed a director, effective April 1, 2022. Ms. Dykstra and Mr. Yablon were each appointed a director, effective May 24, 2022. |
(4)
| Mr. Reaves resigned from the Board, effective August 23, 2022 and, in connection therewith, he received his fees on a pro-rata basis through the date of his resignation and, in recognition of his years of distinguished service to the Company, the vesting of his 2022 equity was accelerated. Mr. Ward received a quarterly payment at the beginning of 2022 and resigned from the Board, effective, January 11, 2022. As a result of Mr. Ward’s resignation his unvested 2022 equity award was forfeited. |
Directors who are not our employees and served on our Board of Directors for an entire year receive an annual cash retainer of $100,000 (payable in quarterly installments) plus a grant of shares of restricted Class A Shares with a targeted value on the date of grant of $200,000. The forms and amounts of director compensation outlined above were recommended by the Compensation Committee, and approved by the Board,
after taking into account market data and recommendations of
Directors.Controlledthe Compensation Committee’s compensation consultant.
To directly align the interests of our non-employee directors with the interests of the stockholders, our Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines that require each non-employee director to maintain a minimum ownership interest in the Company. The current ownership guideline requires that a director acquire and maintain shares with a value of at least three times his or her annual cash retainer within five years of election to the Board. Until reaching the ownership target, non-employee directors must retain a minimum of 25% of the stock granted to them in any one year. As of December 31, 2022, all directors are in compliance with these ownership guidelines.
CompanyTABLE OF CONTENTS
Is Hub Group subject to the Nasdaq governance rules regarding director independence?
The Board of Directors has determined that the Company is a “controlled company” as that term is defined by NASDAQNasdaq since the members of the Yeager family, pursuant to their ownership of Class A Shares and all outstanding Class B Common Stock,Shares, control approximately 63%59.6% of the voting power of the Company as of March 13, 2017. Pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement, the Class B Stockholders have agreed to vote all29, 2023. Under Nasdaq rules, a company of their shares of Class B Common Stock in accordance with the votewhich more than 50% of the holders ofvoting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a "controlled company" and may elect not to comply with certain Nasdaq corporate governance standards, including:
the requirement our Board include a majority of such shares atindependent directors;
the requirement that we have a meetingcompensation committee of independent directors; and
the Class B Stockholders held priorrequirement that director nominees be selected by either a majority of a company’s independent directors or by a committee composed entirely of independent directors.
We are, however, subject to the
Annual Meeting, orNasdaq and SEC rules that require full independence of our Audit Committee as
recommendedwell as the requirement for regular executive sessions by the independent
directors of the Board of Directors if there isdirectors. As a
deadlock among Class B Stockholders or if a quorum of Class B Stockholders cannot be achieved at the meeting of the Class B Stockholders after two attempts.Code ofEthics
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) establishes the principles, policies, standards and conduct for professional behavior in the workplace. The Code applies to all employees and may be found on the Corporate Governance page on the Company’s website,www.hubgroup.com. Any waiver of the Code for executive officers of the Company requires approval of theresult, our Audit Committee and must be promptly disclosed to the Company’s stockholders. We intend to disclose on the Investors sectionis entirely comprised of our Company’s website,www.hubgroup.com, any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code that are required to be publicly disclosed under the rulesindependent directors.
Despite this exemption, as a matter of
the SEC. The Audit Committee has also established an Ethics Hotline for employees, officers, directors and third parties to communicate concerns over accounting, auditing matters or other matters.Corporate Governance Guidelines
Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which may be found on the Corporate Governance page on the Company’s website,www.hubgroup.com. These guidelines reflect the Board of Directors’ commitment to oversee the effectiveness of policy and decision-making both at the Board and management level, with a view of enhancing stockholder value.
Director Independence Determinations
We believegood governance, we have determined that a substantial majority of our directors should satisfy the members of our Board should be independent non-employee directors. Our Board has affirmatively determined that six of our eight director nominees, namely Messrs. Eppen, Kenny, McNitt, Reaves, Slark and Ward, qualify as ‘‘independent directors’’independence requirements set forth in accordance with NASDAQNasdaq’s listing standards independence requirements. Each of these directors and nominees has also been determined to have the requisite NASDAQ “financial sophistication” qualifications. All of the members ofthat our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee arealso should consist solely of independent directors. The Nasdaq listing standards define specific relationships that disqualify directors from being independent and financially sophisticated.further require that the Board affirmatively determine that a director has no material relationship with Hub Group in order to be considered “independent.” The NASDAQSEC’s rules and Nasdaq’s listing standards include a seriescontain separate definitions of objective testsindependence for determiningmembers of audit committees and compensation committees, respectively.
How does the Board of Directors determine director independence?
The Board of Directors determines the independence of aeach director such as thatand director nominee in accordance with the elements of independence set forth in the Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules. The Board first considers whether any director or nominee has a member of his familyrelationship covered by the Nasdaq listing standards that would prohibit an independence finding for Board or committee purposes. Any director who has a material relationship with Hub Group or its management is not an employee of the Company and has not engaged in various types of commercial or charitable relationships with the Company.considered to be independent. A copy of our existing guidelines for determining director independence, as included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, is available on the Investors – Corporate Governance page of our Company’s website,www.hubgroup.com. www.hubgroup.com.
Are all of the directors and nominees independent?
Our Executive Chairman, David P. Yeager, and our President and CEO, Phillip D. Yeager, are our only non-independent directors. Our Board has affirmatively determined that eight of our ten director nominees, namely Mses. Boosalis, Dykstra, and Ross and Messrs. Flannery, Kenny, McNitt, Slark, and Yablon, are independent under Nasdaq listing standards. Our Board has made a determination as to each
independent director and former independent director that no relationship exists which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of the director’s independent judgment in carrying out his
or her responsibilities as a director. In making these determinations, our Board reviewed and discussed information provided by the directors and the Company
with regard toregarding each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company, its management and/or its independent registered public accounting firm.
Communicating with The Board also has determined that each person who currently serves or who served in 2022 on the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating and Governance Committee meets or met, as applicable, the Nasdaq independence requirements for membership on those committees and, as to the Audit Committee, SEC rules. In reaching the determination that Mr. Slark is independent, the Board
Stockholders may communicate directly considered that Mr. Slark’s son, David Slark, has been employed by the Company since 2017 and currently serves as Vice President, Insurance and Risk Management, a non-executive officer position, as described in more detail under “Transactions with the Board of Directors. All communications should be directed to the Company’s Secretary at the address set forth hereinManagement and should prominently indicate on the outsideOthers.” Mr. Slark, although a member of the envelopeCompensation Committee which approves decisions pertaining to his son’s compensation, does not participate in discussions that it is intended forinvolve his son’s compensation or in his performance evaluations. David Slark’s cash compensation and equity awards also are approved by the Audit Committee (again with Mr. Slark not participating) pursuant to our related-party transactions approval policy.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS Does the Board of Directors
or for non-management directors. Each communication intended for the Board of Directors and received by the Secretary which is not otherwise commercial in nature will be forwarded to the specified party following its clearance through normal security procedures.Review of Related Party Transactions
have a related-party transactions approval policy?
Yes. Our Related Person Transaction Policy governs the review, approval and ratification of transactions involving the Company and related
persons where the amount involved exceeds $120,000.persons. Related persons include our executive officers, directors, director nominees, 5% or greater stockholders and immediate family members of such persons, and entities in which one of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. Under this policy, prior to entering into any related-person transaction, the
Company’s General Counsel
of the Company is to be notified of the facts and circumstances of the proposed transaction, including: (i) the related person’s relationship to the Company and interest in the transaction; (ii) the material facts of the proposed transaction, including the proposed aggregate value of such transaction or, in the case of indebtedness, the amount of principal that would be involved; (iii) the benefits to the Company of the proposed transaction; (iv) if applicable, the availability of other sources of comparable products or services; and (v) an assessment of whether the proposed transaction is on terms that are comparable to the terms available to an unrelated third party or to employees generally.
The General Counsel then assesses whether the proposed transaction is a related person transaction for purposes of the policy and SEC rules. If the General Counsel determines that the proposed transaction is a related person transaction for such purposes, the proposed transaction is then submitted to the Audit Committee
of the Board of Directors for its consideration; except for related parties who are employees, which process is described below. The Audit Committee considers all of the relevant facts and circumstances available, including (if applicable) but not limited to: (i) the benefits to the Company; (ii) the impact on a director’s independence, in the event a person involved with, or connected to, the proposed transaction is a director; (iii) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (iv) the terms of the transaction; and (v) the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees generally. No member of the Audit Committee participates in any review, consideration or approval of any related person transaction with respect to which such member or any of his immediate family members is the related person. The Audit Committee then makes a recommendation to the Board. The Board approves only those proposed transactions that are in, or are not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, as determined by the Board.
In the event thatIf the Company becomes aware of a related person transaction that has not been previously approved or ratified by the Board or the Audit Committee, a similar process is undertaken by the Board and the Audit Committee to determine if the existing transaction should continue or be terminated and/or if any disciplinary action is appropriate. The General Counsel may also develop, implement and maintain from
time to timetime-to-time certain administrative procedures to ensure the effectiveness of this policy. A copy of our Related Person Transaction Policy is available on the
Investors – Corporate Governance page of our website,
atwww.hubgroup.com.www.hubgroup.com.
What related-party transactions existed in 2022 or are planned for 2023?
In accordance with the Company’s Related Person Transaction Policy, all compensation paid to related party employees is reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.
Mr. Jude Troppoli, the brother-in-law of Mr. David Yeager, serves as Director of Documentation. Mr. Phillip
D. Yeager and
Mr. Matthew Yeager,
sonswho are children of
Mr. David
P. Yeager, serve as
President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President
Account Management and Intermodal Operations and– Procurement, respectively. David Slark, the son of Martin Slark, serves as Vice President,
Specialized Intermodal Services, respectively. Mr. Tom Buffington, the stepson of Mr. Donald Maltby, serves as Assistant Vice President, AccountInsurance and Risk Management.
Ms. Shannon Neumayer, the daughter of Mr. Jim Gaw, former Executive Vice President of Sales, served as Director of Finance and Compliance, Intermodal Operations and Account Management. Mr. Chris Neumayer, the son-in-law of Mr. Jim Gaw, serves as Regional Sales Manager. Each of
Mr. Troppoli, Mr. Neumayer, Mr. Buffington, Messers.Messrs. Phillip D. Yeager, Matthew Yeager, and
Ms. NeumayerSlark earned in excess of $120,000 in salary and bonuses for
2016.2022. Each individual’s compensation is comparable to other employees with equivalent qualifications, experience and responsibilities at the Company. All compensation for the foregoing individuals was approved by our Compensation
Committee. There were no other related person transactionsCommittee, with Mr. Martin Slark not participating in
2016.
OWNERSHIP OF THE CAPITAL STOCK OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth informationthe discussions with respect to the numbercompensation of his son, David Slark.
In August 2022, the Company entered into a Common Stock Exchange and Repurchase Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with entities affiliated with David P. Yeager, then the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (collectively, the “DPY Entities”) and entities affiliated with Mark A. Yeager, the brother of David P. Yeager (collectively, the “MAY Entities”). Pursuant to the Exchange Agreement, the MAY Entities transferred 243,755 shares of Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, to the DPY Entities in exchange for 342,728 shares of Class A Common Stock, and$0.01 par value per share (the “Class A Exchange Shares”; such transfer in exchange for the Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by (i) each directorA Exchange Shares is referred to herein as the “Exchange”). Immediately after the consummation of the Company, (ii)Exchange, the current executive officers of the Company named in the table under “Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers--Summary Compensation Table,” (iii) all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group, and (iv) based on information availableMAY Entities sold to the Company and a review of statements filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(d) and 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), each person that owns beneficially (directly or together with affiliates) more than 5%(i) all of the Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock, in each case as of February 28, 2017. The Company believes that each individual or entity named has sole investmentExchange Shares and voting power with respect to shares of the Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock indicated as beneficially owned by them, except as otherwise noted. The Company acts as transfer agent for the Class B Common Stock. Beneficial ownership of(ii) 87,393 shares of Class B Common Stock is(the “Remaining Class B Shares”), representing all of the remaining shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the MAY Entities, for an aggregate purchase price of $34.8 million (the “Repurchase” and, together with the
TABLE OF CONTENTS
“Exchange,” the “Transaction”). The purchase price for the Repurchase was based on a price per share equal to the stock ledger maintainedclosing price of Class A Common Stock on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of the Agreement. In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Remaining Class B Shares acquired by the Company aswere cancelled and converted into Class A Common Stock upon acquisition and are not available for reissuance. The Transaction was approved by the Audit Committee of the Record Date andBoard pursuant to the termsCompany’s Related Person Transaction Policy approval procedures.
DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS Based solely upon our review of the
Stockholders’ Agreement (the “Stockholders Agreement”).| | | Number (1) | |
| Name | | Class A | | | Percentage | | | Class B | | | Percentage | |
| David P. Yeager (2)(3) | | | 275,650 | | | * | | | | 662,296 | | | | 100 | % |
| Mark A. Yeager (2) (4) (5) | | | — | | | * | | | | 662,296 | | | | 100 | % |
| Terri A. Pizzuto | | | 165,236 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| Donald G. Maltby | | | 106,554 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| James J. Damman | | | 80,133 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| David L. Marsh | | | 101,628 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| Gary D. Eppen | | | 77,326 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| Charles R. Reaves | | | 73,947 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| Martin P. Slark | | | 96,393 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| Jonathan P. Ward | | | 18,344 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| James Kenny | | | 9,625 | | | * | | | | — | | | * | |
| All directors and executive officers (16 people) | | | 1,168,161 | | | | 3.5 | % | | | 662,296 | | | | 100 | % |
| Diamond Hill Capital Mgt., Inc. (6) | | | 3,656,234 | | | | 10.9 | % | | | — | | | * | |
| BlackRock, Inc. (7) | | | 4,852,804 | | | | 14.6 | % | | | — | | | * | |
| The Vanguard Group (8) | | | 2,728,791 | | | | 8.2 | % | | | — | | | * | |
| FMR LLC (9) | | | 2,953,433 | | | | 8.9 | % | | | — | | | * | |
| Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (10) | | | 2,342,873 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | — | | | * | |
| * | Represents less than 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. |
| (1) | CalculatedForms 3, 4 and 5 filed pursuant to Rule 13d-3(d) under the Exchange Act. Under Rule 13d-3(d), shares not outstanding which are subject to options, warrants, rights, or conversion privileges exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the number and percentage owned by such person, but not deemed outstanding for the purpose of calculating the percentage owned by each other person listed. |
| (2) | David Yeager and Mark Yeager are parties to the Stockholders’ Agreement, pursuant to which they have agreed to vote all of their shares of Class B Common Stock in accordance with the vote of the holders of a majority of such shares at a meeting of the Class B Stockholders held prior to the Annual Meeting, or as recommended by the independent directors of the Board of Directors if there is a deadlock among Class B Stockholders or if a quorum of Class B Stockholders cannot be achieved at the meeting of Class B Stockholders after two attempts. See the section “Proxies, Voting Rights, Quorum and Procedures” for more details. Except as provided in footnotes 3 and 4 each of the Yeager family members disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of Class B Common Stock held by the other Yeager family members. The Class B Common Stock represents approximately 62% of the total votes allocable to the Common Stock. Members of the Yeager family own all of the Class B Common Stock. |
| (3) | Includes 154,583 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the DPY 2015 Exempt Children’s Trust, 51,624 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the Laura C. Yeager 2015 GST Trust, 51,624 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the Matthew D. Yeager 2015 GST Trust and 51,624 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the Phillip D. Yeager 2015 GST Trust, 21,693 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by David P. Yeager Nonexempt Trust created under Philip C. Yeager 1994 Trust and 331,148 shares of Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by Mark A. Yeager, to which David P. Yeager may be deemed to have shared voting discretion pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement. See Notes 2 and 4. |
| (4) | Includes 86,794 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by Mr. Mark A. Yeager individually, 87,866 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the Alexander B. Yeager 1994 GST Trust, 87,866 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the Samantha N. Yeager 1994 GST Trust, 48,715 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the Mark A. Yeager Non-Exempt Trust, and 331,148 shares of Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by David P. Yeager, to which Mark A. Yeager may be deemed to have shared voting discretion pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement. Also includes 19,907 shares of Class B Common Stock owned by the Mark A. Yeager Perpetual Trust for which Mark A. Yeager serves as sole trustee and has sole investment and voting discretion. See Notes 2 and 3. |
| (5) | Mr. Mark A. Yeager last filed a Form 4 dated April 20, 2015, which is the basis for determining his stock ownership above. |
| (6) | Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. (“Diamond Hill”) filed Amendment No. 2 to Schedule 13G dated February 6, 2017 with the SEC indicating beneficial ownership of shares of Class A Common Stock. According to the Schedule 13G, Diamond Hill has sole dispositive power with respect to all 3,656,234 shares of Class A Common Stock and sole voting power with respect to 3,505,247 shares of Class A Common Stock. The number of shares beneficially owned by Diamond Hill is indicated as of December 31, 2016. The address of Diamond Hill is 325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43215. |
| (7) | BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) filed Amendment No. 8 to Schedule 13G dated January 10, 2017 with the SEC indicating beneficial ownership of shares of Class A Common Stock. According to the Schedule 13G, BlackRock has sole dispositive power with respect to all 4,852,804 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned and sole voting power with respect to 4,739,640 shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned. The number of shares beneficially owned by BlackRock is indicated as of December 31, 2016. The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022. |
| (8) | The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”) filed Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13G dated February 9, 2017 with the SEC indicating beneficial ownership of shares of Class A Common Stock. According to the Schedule 13G, Vanguard has sole dispositive power with respect to 2,661,500 shares of Class A Common Stock, shared dispositive power with respect to 67,291 shares of Class A Common Stock, sole voting power with respect to 64,818 shares of Class A Common Stock and shared voting power with respect to 4,315 shares of Class A Common Stock. The number of shares beneficially owned by Vanguard is indicated as of December 31, 2016. The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. |
| (9) | FMR LLC (“FMR”) filed Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13G dated February 13, 2017 with the SEC indicating beneficial ownership of shares of Class A Common Stock. According to the Schedule 13G, FMR has sole dispositive power with respect to all 2,953,433 shares of Class A Common Stock and sole voting power with respect to 656,182 shares of Class A Common Stock. The number of shares beneficially owned by FMR is indicated as of December 31, 2016. The address of FMR is 245 Summer Street, Boston, MA 02210. |
| (10) | Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”) filed a Schedule 13G dated February 9, 2017 with the SEC indicating beneficial ownership of shares of Class A Common Stock. According to the Schedule 13G, Dimensional has sole dispositive power with respect to all 2,342,873 shares of Class A Common Stock and sole voting power with respect to 2,252,385 shares of Class A Common Stock. The address of Dimensional is Building One, 63000 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, requires the Company’s directorsas amended, during (or with respect to) our most recent fiscal year and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of Common Stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors, and greater than ten-percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to the Company, or written representations from certain reporting personsour officers and directors that no Forms 5other reports were required, we believe that all filing requirements applicable toof our directors, officers and directors and ten-percent beneficial owners were complied withof more than 10% of the Company’s common stock have filed all such reports on a timely basis during the 2016 fiscal year with the exception2022, except one Form 3 for Michael E. Flannery, which was filed late due to EDGAR access issues.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This section provides details of
a Form 4 filed two days late on April 7, 2016, by Mr. Damman to report the disposition of 456 shares to satisfy tax withholding obligations.compensation during 2022 for our “Named Executive Officers”: David P. Yeager (effective January 1, 2023, Executive Chairman; Chief Executive Officer through December 31, 2022), Phillip D. Yeager (effective January 1, 2023, President and Chief Executive Officer; Chief Operating Officer through December 31, 2022), Geoffrey F. DeMartino (Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer), Vincent C. Paperiello (Former Executive Vice President – President, Intermodal and Chief Solutions Officer), and Thomas P. LaFrance (Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary).
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Overview of Compensation Program
Our Compensation Committee has the responsibility for determining the compensation that is paid or awarded to our Company’s executive officers (for purposes of this proxy statement, the term “executive officer” means the senior leadership of the Company, including
those officers subject to the reporting and liability provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Section 16
OfficersOfficers”) and Named Executive Officers). Our Compensation Committee consists of the
fiveeight current independent members of the Board. Our Compensation Committee
ensuresstrives to ensure that the total compensation paid to our executive officers is fair, reasonable, competitive and drives behavior that increases stockholder value over the
long-term.long term.
Compensation Best Practices
We strive to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders and to follow sound corporate governance practices. We believe our compensation program strikes the appropriate balance between using responsible pay practices and appropriately incentivizing our executives to create value for our stockholders. This balance is evidenced by the following:
| | Pay for performance | | | A meaningful part of executive compensation is performance based, including our annual cash incentive, which is based on diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for our Executive Chairman and our President and Chief Executive Officer, and based on a combination of EPS and personal goals for all other executives, and our long-term incentive, which is based on the Company’s earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) as a percentage of gross margin. Annual restricted stock grants to executive officers are fifty percent performance-based and fifty percent time-based. | |
| | Robust stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements | | | Our stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements create further alignment with stockholders’ long-term interests. See “Director Compensation” and “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Stock Ownership Guidelines”. | |
| | No employment agreements | | | We have no employment, severance or golden parachute agreements with any of our Named Executive Officers and therefore, no excise tax gross-ups. | |
| | Multi-year vesting
period for restricted
stock awards | | | Time-based restricted stock awards and performance-based restricted stock awards generally have a 5- and 3-year vesting period, respectively. | |
| | No hedging Hub Group securities | | | Our policy prohibits executive officers and directors from engaging in hedging transactions involving our stock. See “Corporate Governance – Does the Company Have a Policy Regarding Hedging?”. | |
| | Tax gross-ups | | | We do not provide tax gross-up payments except in connection with annual physicals that Section 16 Officers may receive. | |
| | No repricing underwater stock options without stockholder approval | | | Our equity incentive plan prohibits repricing underwater stock options, reducing the exercise price of stock options or replacing awards with cash or another award type, without stockholder approval. | |
| | Annual compensation
risk assessment | | | At least annually, our Compensation Committee assesses the risk of our compensation program. | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
Our Company’s compensation philosophy is designed to link executive performance to long-term stockholder value, connect pay with individual performance, maintain a compensation system that is competitive with industry standards and attract and retain outstanding executives. We seek to
incentincentivize our executives through both
short termshort-term and
long termlong-term awards, with a goal of rewarding superior Company performance. Our ultimate objective is to improve stockholder value.
Our Compensation Committee evaluates both performance and compensation to ensure that our Company maintains its ability to attract and retain superior employees in key positions and that compensation provided to key employees remains competitive relative to the compensation paid to similarly situated executives of our peer companies. To that end, our Compensation Committee believes executive compensation packages provided to our executives should include both cash and stock-based compensation that reward performance as measured against pre-established goals.
Role of Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
Our Compensation Committee, with input and recommendations from our
Executive Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer,
and President, makes all compensation decisions for the executive officers and approves,
if deemed appropriate, recommendations of equity awards to all executive officers of the Company.
TheHowever, our Executive Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer
and President do not play any role in the Compensation Committee’s determination of their own compensation.
TheOur Executive Chairman and our Chief Executive Officer
and President annually review the performance of the executive officers. The conclusions reached and recommendations based on these reviews, including salary adjustments and annual stock and cash award amounts, are presented to the Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee can exercise its discretion in modifying any recommended adjustments of stock or cash awards to executives.
Setting Executive Compensation
Based on the foregoing objectives, our Compensation Committee has structured the Company’s annual and long-term incentive-based cash and non-cash executive compensation to motivate executives to achieve the business goals set by the Company and reward the executives for achieving such goals.
Compensation Consultant.
To help the Company achieve its compensation objectives, our Compensation Committee engaged Korn Ferry Hay Group (“Korn Ferry”) as its independent compensation consultant for 2016.2022. Korn Ferry (or its predecessor, Hay GroupGroup) has been the compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee since 2004. The consultant’s role is to advise our Compensation Committee on all executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee asked the consultant to provide relevant market data and evaluate the Company’s total compensation system relative to the compensation systems employed by comparable companies in the transportation industry and the overall U.S. industrial market. The consultant also provides an additional measure of assurance that the Company’s executive compensation program is a reasonable and appropriate means to achieve our objectives. In 2016, Hay Group did not provide any additional services to the Company in excess of $120,000.
Market Benchmarking. A benchmark group of publicly-tradedpublicly traded companies in the transportation industry is chosen based on comparable revenue, market capitalization and number of employees. The peer group is used annually by our Compensation Committee to ensure that Hub Group’s compensation programs offer competitive total compensation opportunities and reflect best practices in compensation plan design. For 2016,2022, the companies comprising the “Compensation Peer Group” were:were(1):
ArcBest Corporation | | | Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
Forward Air, Inc. | | | Ryder System, Inc. |
GXO Logistics, Inc. | | | Saia, Inc. |
JB Hunt Transportation Services, Inc. | | | Schneider National, Inc. |
Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings, Inc. | | | Werner Enterprises, Inc. |
Landstar Systems, Inc. | | | |
(1)
| Echo Global Logistics, Inc. ceased to be a publicly traded company in 2021 and was removed from the Compensation Peer Group in 2022 due to lack of available compensation and financial information. The Company added GXO Logistics, Inc. to its Compensation Peer Group in 2022. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ArcBest Corporation
Heartland Express, Inc.
J.B. Hunt Transportation Services, Inc.
Knight Transportation, Inc.
Landstar System, Inc.
Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.
Ryder System, Inc.
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.
Saia, Inc.
Swift Transportation Co.
Universal Truckload Services, Inc.
Werner Enterprises, Inc.
XPO Logistics, Inc.
YRC Worldwide, Inc.
In addition, information on annual base salary increases and compensation data for the U.S. general industrial markets is provided by our Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
The Company’s
Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
and President develop pay recommendations for the Company’s executives based on (i)
the aforementioned market data, (ii) each executive’s individual performance and functional responsibilities
as determined by the Chief Executive Officer and President and (iii) Company performance, both financial and non-financial. Our Compensation Committee,
reviews and approves these pay recommendations with the advice of its independent compensation
consultant.consultant, reviews and, if appropriate, approves these pay recommendations. Our Compensation Committee also sets the base salary and incentive opportunities for the Company’s
Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer based on (i) the aforementioned market data, (ii) the Chief Executive Officer’s individual performance and responsibilities and (iii) Company performance, both financial and non-financial.
Our Compensation Committee generally seeks to set the base salary for executive officers at a competitive level compared to similarly situated executives according to survey data from the
Hay GroupKorn Ferry Executive Compensation Report (the
“Hay Group“Korn Ferry survey”). Our Compensation Committee also considers, on a secondary basis, the executive compensation disclosure included in the proxy statements of the companies comprising the Compensation Peer Group. Variations to this objective do occur as dictated by the experience level of the individual, personal performance and market factors.
There is no pre-established policy or target for the allocation between either cash and non-cash or short-term and long-term incentive compensation. Rather, our Compensation Committee reviews information provided by our compensation consultant to determine the appropriate level and mix of incentive compensation. Pay for such incentive compensation is awarded as a result of the performance of the Company or the individual, depending on the type of award, compared to pre-established goals. Our
2022 Advisory vote on Executive Compensation Committee noted that Hub’s
Hub Group’s stockholders overwhelmingly approved the Company’s 2015, 20142022 and 20132021 compensation for named executive officers with at leastover 98% approval ratingsof the votes cast approving each year. For 2016, our
Our Compensation Committee
has continuedreviewed the results of the 2022 stockholder advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation and incorporated the results as one of the many factors considered in connection with
this same generalthe discharge of its responsibilities. Since a substantial majority of our stockholders voting at the annual meeting approved the compensation
structure sinceprogram described in our 2022 Proxy Statement, the
Compensation Committee
believes it isdid not implement changes to our executive compensation program as a
successful structuredirect result of the stockholders’ advisory vote. Our Compensation Committee will continue to review and
has been consistently supported by our stockholders.2016consider the results of the stockholder advisory vote on Named Executive Officer compensation and may make changes based on that review.
2022 Executive Compensation Components
The Company’s executive compensation program has three
main components--base salary, annual incentives, and long-term incentives. Base salary and annual incentives are primarily designed to reward current and past performance. Long-term incentives are primarily designed to provide strong incentives for long-term future Company growth.
Base Salary. To attract and retain qualified executives, base salary is provided to our executive officers. The base salary is determined based on position and responsibility using competitive criteria within the transportation industry.criteria. During its review of base salaries for the executives, our Compensation Committee primarily considers (i) market data provided by our outside consultants, (ii) an internal review of the executive’s compensation, both individually and relative to other officers, and (iii) individual performance of the executive. Salary levels are typically reviewed annually as part of our annual performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other change in job responsibilities. Increases are based on increases in the cost of living, individual performance and market data. For 2016,2022, the Compensation Committee provided salary increases of 12%-0-% for Mr. David P. Yeager, 4.7%10.0% for Mr. Maltby, 7.1% for Ms. Pizzuto, 7.4%Phillip D. Yeager, 4.2% for Mr. Damman and 4.4%DeMartino, 5.0% for Mr. Marsh.
Paperiello, and 3.0% for Mr. LaFrance.
Annual Cash Incentive. The Company’s annual cash incentive recognizes and rewards executives for taking actions that build the value of the Company and generate competitive total returns for stockholders. Our annual cash incentive is determined with the assistance of the Hay GroupKorn Ferry survey referred to above. TheFor 2022, the value of Mr. David P. Yeager’s target award iswas 125% of his annual base salary, Mr. Phillip D. Yeager’s target award
TABLE OF CONTENTS
was 100% of his annual base salary,
while the other executives are generally set at 60-70%Mr. DeMartino’s target award was 60% of
theirhis annual base salary, Mr. Paperiello’s target award was 70% of his annual base salary, and Mr. LaFrance’s target award was 50% of his annual base salary. This incentive is based solely on
diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for
our Chief Executive OfficerMr. David P. Yeager and
our President.Mr. Phillip D. Yeager. For our other executive officers, this incentive is based on a combination of EPS
(70-80%(80%) and on individual performance compared against certain pre-determined personal goals
(20-30%(20%). The personal goals vary by officer. For
2016,2022, the personal goals for officers responsible for each of our service lines were generally tied to specific financial metrics for the service line managed by the executive. For our other executives, the personal goals were generally tied to specific objectives within their area of responsibility. The personal goals are generally set at a level that is believed to be achievable with superior personal performance.
Ms. Pizzuto’s target incentive related to personal goals was $63,000. For 2016, Ms. Pizzuto’s total bonus related to personal goals was $55,125. Mr. Damman’s target incentive related to personal goals was $56,000, with the opportunity to earn more than his target incentive if he exceeded his goals. For 2016, Mr. Damman’s total bonus related to personal goals was $56,933. Mr. Marsh’s target incentive related to personal goals was $50,400, with the opportunity to earn more than his target incentive if he exceeded his goals. For 2016, Mr. Marsh’s total bonus related to personal goals was $100,800.
Each year, our Compensation Committee sets an EPS target,
for our Company, which may take into account
one-time chargescertain items deemed by the Compensation Committee to be unusual or non-operating in nature and the impact of
ourany share
buybackrepurchase program. Once the year is completed, Hub Group’s earnings per share is compared against the EPS target. If
we meet the EPS target
we payis not met, but the
EPS portion of the award. If we do not meet ourthreshold EPS target
is met or exceeded, we
generally pay a reduced incentive based on a sliding scale between threshold and target. If the threshold target is not met, we generally do not pay any cash incentive related to
EPS or we pay a reduced incentive based on a sliding scale. In the
same way,EPS. Similarly, our executives can earn
also on a sliding scale, up to
twice200% of their EPS target incentive if we substantially exceed our EPS
target, with the incentive being paid based on a sliding scale between target and the maximum level EPS target. For
2016, our sliding scale started at $2.00 and our2022, the Compensation Committee set the threshold EPS target
for 2016 was set at
$2.15. Our executives could earn twice their$5.06 to receive any portion of the EPS cash incentive, the full value EPS target
incentive if we earned $2.30 per share. During 2016, we earned $2.17 per share. Based on our pre- approved sliding scale, our executives therefore received 110% of theirat $5.90 and the maximum level EPS target
incentive.at $6.25. For 2022 our actual EPS was $10.64, which resulted in a payout based on EPS of 200%.
Mr.
Yeager’sDeMartino’s target incentive related to
EPSpersonal goals was
$800,000 for 2016.$60,000 and he earned $30,000 based on achievement of 50% of his personal goals. Mr.
Yeager received 110% of this targeted amount, which was $880,000, in accordance with the sliding scale previously approved by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Maltby’sPaperiello’s target incentive related to
EPSpersonal goals was
$392,000 for 2016.$120,540 and he earned $56,503 based on achievement of 47% of his personal goals. Mr.
Maltby received 110% of this targeted amount, which was $431,200. Ms. Pizzuto’sLaFrance’s target incentive related to
EPSpersonal goals was
$252,000 for 2016. Ms. Pizzuto received 110%$45,320 and he earned $45,320 based on achievement of
this targeted amount, which was $277,200. Mr. Damman’s target incentive related to EPS was $224,000 for 2016. Mr. Damman received 110%100% of
this targeted amount, which was $246,400. Mr. Marsh’s target incentive related to EPS was $201,600 for 2016. Mr. Marsh received 110% of this targeted amount, which was $221,760.his personal goals. All cash compensation is approved by our Compensation Committee before it is paid to our executive officers.
Long-Term Equity Incentives.
The Company’s Long-Term Equity Incentive (“LTI”) Program serves to reward executive performance that successfully executes the Company’s long-term business strategy and builds stockholder value. The programLTI Program allows for the awardingawards of options and stock appreciation rights, time and performance based restricted stock and performance units. The Long-Term Equity IncentiveLTI Program encourages participants to focus on long-term Company performance and provides an opportunity for executive officers and certain designated key employees to increase their ownership stake in the Company through grants of the Company’s Class A Common Stock.Shares. The Company adopted the Hub Group, Inc. 20022022 Long-Term Incentive Plan as amended in 2007, in connection with its long-term equity incentive program.LTI Program.
The Company has historically made an annual grant of restricted stock to its executive officers. Our Compensation Committee reviews management’s recommendation and approves the restricted stock awards for each Section 16 officer.Officer. Our restricted stock grants for employeesSection 16 Officers typically vest ratably, once per year, over five years.years and, beginning in 2018, consisted of a performance-based restricted stock grant in addition to time-based restricted stock grant. That program of restricted stock grants continued in 2022 (the “2022 LTI Awards”) when the Compensation Committee granted the restricted awards to executives in January 2022.
For the 2022 LTI Awards, the Compensation Committee first established the long-term incentive target opportunity for each executive in the LTI Program. The target value was a target number of restricted shares for the individual awards. The 2022 LTI Awards consisted of 50% performance-based restricted stock vesting upon the third anniversary of the grant date and 50% time-based restricted stock vesting ratably, once per year, over a five-year period, subject to the executive’s continued employment. There are no other metrics tied to vesting of these time-based awards. The Compensation Committee has the discretion to accelerate the vesting of these awards.
For all participants, vesting of the performance-based 2022 LTI Awards is tied to achievement of the Company’s earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) as a percentage of gross margin for the three-year period ending December 31, 2024.
The Compensation Committee set a threshold, target, and maximum level for this performance measure under each of the 2022 LTI Awards. The levels were designed such that the underlying performance-based shares will not vest if we do not at least achieve the minimum level (threshold) of performance. Vesting at target level
TABLE OF CONTENTS
requires us to fully meet our performance expectations and full vesting at the maximum level requires a high level of performance. Forfeiture or grant of additional shares at performance levels between threshold, target and maximum is determined based on straight-line interpolation, with steps, for these shares.
The following table presents the possible payouts for shares of performance-based restricted stock at different levels of performance:
EBITDA as a percent of gross margin: Total Payout | | | 0% | | | Payout interpolated from Threshold to Target Level with steps | | | 100% | | | Payout interpolated from Target Level to Maximum Level with steps | | | 200% |
The performance shares will vest and be released to the awardee if and only to the extent the Compensation Committee certifies that the performance levels for the awards have been satisfied.
There are significant assumptions built into the achievement levels described above for the 2022 LTI Awards. The Compensation Committee retains discretion to adjust the achievement levels when market conditions or other events (such as acquisitions or divestitures) occur during the performance period that were not anticipated in the design of the awards at grant.
In November 2016,2021, our Compensation Committee delegated to our Chief Executive Officer the ability to grant up to 75,000 shares of time-based restricted stock in the aggregate to non-executivenon-Section 16 officers each year.during 2022. Our Chief Executive Officer grants this stock from time to time to new hires or in connection with a promotion or outstanding performance by current employees. During 2022, under this authority, our CEO awarded a total of 26,801 shares (valued, in the aggregate, at $1,958,550) to 85 employees.
The Company has not granted any stock options since 2003.
Vesting of 2020 LTI Awards. In 2020, certain senior Company executives received grants of performance-based restricted stock for the three-year performance period ending on December 31, 2022, using EBITDA as a percentage of gross margin as the performance metric.
The performance criteria for the 2020 LTI Award is set forth in the table below, with payouts interpolated if performance falls below the measures below.
| | 46.7% or less | | | 0% | |
| | 46.8% | | | 20% | |
| | 48.1% | | | 40% | |
| | 49.4% | | | 60% | |
| | 50.7% | | | 80% | |
| | 52.0% | | | 100% | |
| | 53.3% | | | 120% | |
| | 54.6% | | | 140% | |
| | 55.9% | | | 160% | |
| | 57.2% | | | 180% | |
| | 58.5% | | | 200% | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Company’s actual results for EBITDA as a percent of gross margin for 2020 LTI Awards exceeded 58.5%, which resulted in a payout equal to 200%. The resulting share amounts earned by our Named Executive Officers are set forth in the table below. Mr. DeMartino and Mr. LaFrance did not receive an LTI Award in 2020.
| | David P. Yeager | | | 40,000 | |
| | Phillip D. Yeager | | | 16,000 | |
| | Geoffrey F. DeMartino | | | n/a | |
| | Vincent C Paperiello | | | 10,000 | |
| | Thomas P. LaFrance | | | n/a | |
Perquisites and Other Compensation
Our
The Company provides executive officers with perquisites and other personal benefits that the Company and our Compensation Committee believe are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program to better enable the Company to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. Our Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to named executive officers.
All of our named executive officers
participatedhave the opportunity to participate in our 401(k) plan and
receivedreceive matching funds up to the federally allowed maximum match. We
maintain $50,000 ofprovide life insurance
onto all of our
named executive
officers.officers valued at one times each executive’s annual base salary, subject to a $150,000 limit. The Company
also maintains
athe non-qualified deferred compensation plan
(“DCP”) and provides a matching contribution to participants. The Company makes available to its executive officers an annual physical at a local
hospital.hospital in which the Company pays the taxes associated with this benefit. The Company allows personal use of its fractional airplane interests by certain executive officers. Personal use of our aircraft interests requires approval by the Chief Executive Officer. Our executives must reimburse the Company for their personal use of our aircraft interests at the Standard Industry Fare Level plus either 20% or 30%
, depending on the aircraft.
The Company does not make it a practice to provide tax gross-ups to our named executive officers for perquisites and other compensation.
Retirement and Other Benefits
We do not provide pension arrangements or subsidized post-retirement health coverage for our executives or employees.
Non-Qualified
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation
Our executive officers, in addition to certain other key managerial employees, are entitled to participate in the
Hub Group, Inc. Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”).DCP. Pursuant to this plan, eligible employees can defer certain compensation on a pre-tax basis. The
Deferred Compensation PlanDCP is discussed in further detail
in the table below under the heading
“2016“2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.”
Other Post-Employment Payments
All of our executive officers are employees-at-will and as such do not have employment contracts with us. Certain payments will be made upon a
termination or change
ofin control. These payments are discussed in further detail
below under
the heading “Potential Payouts upon Termination or Change
of Control.”in Control” below.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To directly align the interests of executive officers with the interests of the stockholders, our Board adopted a policy that requires each executive officer to acquire and maintain a minimum ownership interest in the Company. Each executive officer, other than the Chief Executive Officer, must own CompanyClass A Shares (including unvested restricted stock awards) with a value of at least two times his or her base annual salary. The Chief Executive Officer must own Company stockShares with a value of at least three times his base salary. Each executive officer has five years to meet this requirement. Until they do, executive officers must retain a minimum of 25% of the stock granted to them in any one year. Our non-employee directors have also agreed to maintain stock valued at three times their annual retainer, which was increasedAs of December 31, 2022, all Named Executive Officers were in February 2017 from two times their annual retainer. Our non-employee directors have been given five years to meet this requirement and until they do, must retain a minimum of 25% of the stock granted to them in any one year.compliance with these guidelines.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Tax and Accounting Implications
Deductibility of Executive Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), limits the Company’s deduction for
individual compensation
over $1 million paid
in any taxable year to
each of the
persons that meet the definition of a covered employee under Section 162(m). For 2022, covered employees include anyone who was a covered employee for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2016, anyone who held the position of CEO or Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) at any time during the fiscal year and the three most highly compensated employees who acted as executive officers
named in(other than as CEO or CFO) at any time during the
Summary Compensation Table to $1 million each unless certain requirements are met. The policy of our Compensation Committee with respect to section 162(m) is to establish and maintain a compensation program which will enhance the deductibility of compensation. Our Compensation Committee, however, reserves the right to use its judgment, where merited by our Compensation Committee’s need to respond to changing business conditions or by an executive officer’s individual performance, to authorize compensation which may not, in a specific case, be fully deductible to the Company.fiscal year.
Section 274(e) of the Code limits the Company’s deduction for expenses allocated to certain personal use of its fractional airplane interests. For
2016,2022, such expenses, less amounts reimbursed to the Company, were not deductible for federal income tax purposes.
The Compensation Committee continues to view the tax deductibility of executive compensation as one of many factors to be considered in the context of its overall compensation philosophy and therefore reserves the right to approve compensation that may not be deductible in situations it deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee also considers the accounting treatment of the cash and equity awards that it grants and maintains.
Compensation Committee Report
This report is submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K and based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the CD&A be included in this Proxy Statement.
This report has been furnished by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
James C. Kenny, Chairman
Mary Boosalis
Michael E. Flannery
Lisa Dykstra
Peter B. McNitt
Jenell Ross
Martin P. Slark
Gary Yablon
The above Compensation Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Hub Group filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Hub Group specifically incorporates this report by reference therein.
| COMPENSATION COMMITTEE |
| |
| Martin P. Slark, Chairman |
| Gary D. Eppen |
| Charles R. Reaves |
| Jonathan P. Ward
James C. Kenny
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
20162022 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table sets forth a summary of the annual, long-term and other compensation for services rendered to the Company
for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 paid or awarded
during 2022, 2021 and 2020 to
those persons who were: (i)our Named Executive Officers. We have omitted from this table the
Company’s chief executive officer at December 31, 2016, (ii) the Company’s chief financial officer at December 31, 2016columns for “Bonus”, “Option Awards” and
(iii) the Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief executive officer“Change in Pension Value and
chief financial officer (collectively, together with the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the “Named Executive Officers”).| Name and Principal | | | | Salary | | | Bonus | | | Stock Awards | | | Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) | | | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings(3) | | | All Other Compensation (4) | | | Total | |
| Position | | Year | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($)(1) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | | | ($) | |
| David P. Yeager | | 2016 | | | 800,000 | | | | — | | | | 988,500 | | | | 880,000 | | | | — | | | | 192,778 | (5) | | | 2,861,278 | |
| Chairman and Chief | | 2015 | | | 714,563 | | | | — | | | | 902,902 | | | | 700,272 | | | | — | | | | 169,891 | | | | 2,487,628 | |
| Executive Officer | | 2014 | | | 693,750 | | | | — | | | | 865,260 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 160,076 | | | | 1,719,086 | |
| Terri A. Pizzuto | | 2016 | | | 450,000 | | | | — | | | | 593,100 | | | | 332,325 | | | | — | | | | 21,486 | (6) | | | 1,396,911 | |
| Executive Vice President, | | 2015 | | | 420,050 | | | | — | | | | 615,615 | | | | 358,723 | | | | — | | | | 19,984 | | | | 1,414,372 | |
| CFO and Treasurer | | 2014 | | | 380,050 | | | | — | | | | 589,950 | | | | 26,604 | | | | — | | | | 18,261 | | | | 1,014,865 | |
| Donald G. Maltby | | 2016 | | | 560,000 | | | | — | | | | 659,000 | | | | 431,200 | | | | — | | | | 147,828 | (7) | | | 1,798,028 | |
| President and Chief Operating | | 2015 | | | 166,696 | | | | — | | | | 702,180 | | | | 174,766 | | | | — | | | | 233,441 | | | | 1,277,083 | |
| Officer | | 2014 | | | 334,750 | | | | — | | | | 471,960 | | | | 53,309 | | | | — | | | | 20,358 | | | | 880,377 | |
| James J. Damman | | 2016 | | | 400,000 | | | | — | | | | 494,250 | | | | 303,333 | | | | — | | | | 7,986 | (8) | | | 1,205,569 | |
| President, Mode | | 2015 | | | 372,376 | | | | — | | | | 492,492 | | | | 341,469 | | | | — | | | | 7,382 | | | | 1,213,719 | |
| Transportation, LLC | | 2014 | | | 361,530 | | | | — | | | | 593,318 | | | | 60,105 | | | | — | | | | 6,894 | | | | 1,021,847 | |
| David L. Marsh | | 2016 | | | 360,000 | | | | — | | | | 494,250 | | | | 322,560 | | | | — | | | | 18,786 | (9) | | | 1,195,596 | |
| Chief Highway Solutions Officer | | 2015 | | | 344,793 | | | | — | | | | 492,492 | | | | 321,062 | | | | — | | | | 17,726 | | | | 1,176,073 | |
David P. Yeager
Former Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer(5)
| | | 2022 | | | $950,000 | | | $2,200,000 | | | $2,375,000 | | | $296,094 | | | $5,821,094 |
| | 2021 | | | $950,000 | | | $2,280,000 | | | $2,375,000 | | | $119,294 | | | $5,724,633 |
| | 2020 | | | $950,000 | | | $2,099,600 | | | $0 | | | $119,633 | | | $3,168,894 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Phillip D. Yeager
Former President and Chief
Operating Officer(5)
| | | 2022 | | | $632,500 | | | $1,600,000 | | | $1,265,000 | | | $134,458 | | | $3,631,958 |
| | 2021 | | | $575,000 | | | $1,140,000 | | | $1,150,000 | | | $26,173 | | | $2,891,173 |
| | 2020 | | | $544,231 | | | $839,840 | | | $0 | | | $25,098 | | | $1,409,169 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Geoffrey F. DeMartino
EVP, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
| | | 2022 | | | $500,000 | | | $550,000 | | | $510,000 | | | $14,413 | | | $1,574,413 |
| | 2021 | | | $480,000 | | | $456,000 | | | $489,600 | | | $8,923 | | | $1,434,523 |
| | 2020 | | | $429,724 | | | $200,039 | | | $0 | | | $22,398 | | | $652,161 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vincent C. Paperiello(6)
Former EVP–President,
Intermodal & Chief Solutions
Officer
| | | 2022 | | | $430,500 | | | $825,000 | | | $538,663 | | | $22,283 | | | $1,816,446 |
| | 2021 | | | $395,000 | | | $684,000 | | | $525,350 | | | $8,923 | | | $1,613,273 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas P. LaFrance(6)
EVP, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary
| | | 2022 | | | $453,200 | | | $550,000 | | | $407,880 | | | $19,077 | | | $1,430,157 |
(1)
| (1)Includes compensation contributed to our 401(k) Plan or deferred under our DCP. The amounts of the 2022 salary deferrals under the DCP are included in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table. |
(2)
| Consists ofFor 2022, represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards made by our Company to our executives in 2016, 2015 and 2014calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Certain of the awards are subject to performance conditions, and the reported value at the grant date is based upon the probable outcome of such conditions on such date. The amounts expensed in 2016, 2015 and 2014 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 with respectvalues of the awards that are subject to restricted stock awards made by our Companyperformance conditions at the grant date assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved for 2022 are as follows for each applicable Named Executive Officer: |
2022
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Time-based | | | $1,110,000 | | | $800,000 | | | $275,000 | | | $412,500 | | | $275,000 |
Performance-based | | | $2,220,000 | | | $1,600,000 | | | $550,000 | | | $825,000 | | | $550,000 |
Information regarding the assumptions made in the valuation of these awards is set forth in Note 13 of the annual consolidated financial statements in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 24, 2023.
(3)
| Represents the annual cash incentives paid to our executives each with a vesting period of five years are $845,164, $777,567 and $696,174, respectively, for Mr. David Yeager; $561,323, $519,311 and $451,735, respectively, for Ms. Pizzuto; $365,860, $78,020 and $377,853, respectively, for Mr. Maltby (Mr. Maltby’s 2015 grant vests over three years); $524,652, $471,051 and $369,220, respectively, for Mr. Damman; and $452,012 and $411,713 for Mr. Marsh in 2016 and 2015, respectively. |
| (2) | In addition to salary, our Compensation Committee provides an annual cash incentive. Our annual cash incentive is determined with the assistance of the Hay Group survey. With the exception of the Chief Executive Officer, the value of the target award is generally set, starting in 2012, at 70% of salary. This incentive is based solely on EPS for our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer. For our other named executive officers, 80%officers. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(4)
| The following table indicates the components of this incentive is based on EPS and 20% is based on individual performance compared against certain predetermined personal goals.“All Other Compensation” for each of our Named Executive Officers during 2022: |
| | D. Yeager | | | $9,150 | | | $223 | | | $21,750 | | | $5,245 | | | $259,726 | |
| | P. Yeager | | | $9,150 | | | $223 | | | $18,962 | | | — | | | $106,123 | |
| | G. DeMartino | | | $9,150 | | | $223 | | | $5,040 | | | — | | | — | |
| | V. Paperiello | | | $9,150 | | | $223 | | | $12,910 | | | — | | | — | |
| | T. LaFrance | | | — | | | $223 | | | $13,593 | | | $5,261 | | | — | |
| (3) | Represents above market earnings on deferred compensation. |
| (4)*
| Personal use of our aircraftfractional airplane interests is subject to the Company’s Perquisites Policy and requires approval by the Chief Executive Officer. Our executives must reimburse the Company for their personal use of our fractional aircraft interest at the Standard Industry Fare Level plus either 20% or 30% depending on the aircraft. We value the personal use of our aircraft interests as the difference between the amount paid by the executive to the Company for use of the plane and the aggregate incremental cost of using the plane. The incremental cost includes the hourly flight fee, all fuel charges, overnight fees, on-board catering, landing fees, parking fees, certain taxes and passenger ground transportation. We do not include in incremental costs the fixed costs that do not change based on personal usage, such as monthly management fees or the purchase or lease costs of our fractional interest in aircraft. |
| (5) | Represents our Company’s matching contribution to the Section 401(k) plan of $7,950, the value of insurance premiums paid Personal aircraft use by the Company for term life insurance equal to $36, the match made toYeager family is reimbursed by Mr. Yeager’s account in our Deferred Compensation Plan equal to $24,000David Yeager and the value of an executive physical equal to $4,260. Also represents Mr. Yeager’s personal use of our Company’s fractional airplane interests equal to $156,532.Phillip Yeager. |
(5)
| (6) | Represents our Company’s matching contribution to the Section 401(k) planMr. David P. Yeager was appointed Executive Chairman of $7,950, the value of insurance premiums paid by the Company for term life insurance equal to $36 and the match made to Ms. Pizzuto’s account in our Deferred Compensation Plan equal to $13,500. |
| (7) | Represents our Company’s matching contribution to the Section 401(k) planMr. Phillip D. Yeager was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of $7,950, the value of insurance premiums paid by the Company for term life insurance equal to $36, the match made to Mr. Maltby’s account in our Deferred Compensation Plan equal to $16,800, housing related expenses of $50,000 and the value of an executive physical equal to $5,960. Also represents Mr. Maltby’s personal use of our Company’s fractional airplane interests and associated tax gross up equal to $67,082.effective January 1, 2023. |
(6)
| (8) | Represents our Company’s matching contribution to the Section 401(k) plan of $7,950 and the value of insurance premiums paid byMr. Paperiello joined the Company for term life insurance equal to $36 forin 1993 but did not become a Named Executive Officer until 2021. Mr. Damman. |
| (9) | Represents our Company’s matching contribution to the Section 401(k) plan of $7,950 and the value of insurance premiums paid byLaFrance joined the Company for term life insurance equal to $36 and the match made to Mr. Marsh’s account in our Deferred Compensation Plan equal to $10,800.August 2021 but did not become a Named Executive Officer until 2022. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
20162022 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All Other | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Stock | | | All Other | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Awards: | | | Option | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number | | | Awards: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Estimated Future Payouts | | | Estimated Future Payouts | | | of Shares | | | Number of | | | Exercise or | | | Grant Date | |
| | | | | Under Non-Equity | | | Under Equity Incentive Plan | | | of Stock | | | Securities | | | Base Price | | | Fair Value of | |
| | | | | Incentive Plan Awards | | | Awards | | | or | | | Underlying | | | of Option | | | Stock | |
| Name | | Grant Date | | Threshold ($) | | | Target ($) | | | Maximum ($) | | | Threshold ($) | | | Target ($) | | | Maximum ($) | | | Units (#) | | | Options (#) | | | Awards ($/Sh) | | | and Option Awards ($) | |
| David P. Yeager | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted Stock | | 1/2/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30,000 | (1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 988,500 | |
| Annual Cash Incentive | | | | | — | | | | 800,000 | | | | 1,600,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Terri A. Pizzuto | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted Stock | | 1/2/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18,000 | (1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 593,100 | |
| Annual Cash Incentive | | | | | — | | | | 315,000 | | | | 567,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Donald G. Maltby | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted Stock | | 1/2/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,000 | (1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 659,000 | |
| Annual Cash Incentive | | | | | — | | | | 392,000 | | | | 784,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| James J. Damman | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted Stock | | 1/2/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,000 | (1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 494,250 | |
| Annual Cash Incentive | | | | | — | | | | 280,000 | | | | 541,333 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| David L. Marsh | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted Stock | | 1/2/2016 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,000 | (1) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 494,250 | |
| Annual Cash Incentive | | | | | — | | | | 252,000 | | | | 504,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The table below also shows information regarding equity awards made to our named executive officers during 2022. We have omitted from this table the columns for “All Other Option Awards” and “Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards” because they are inapplicable.
| | D. Yeager | | | RSA(2) | | | 1/2/22 | | | -- | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 13,058(3) | | | $1,100,006 | |
| | | | | PA(3) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 13,058 | | | 26,116 | | | 13,058(4) | | | $1,100,006 | |
| | | | | ACI(4) | | | | | | — | | | $1,187,500 | | | $2,375,000 | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | — | |
| | P. Yeager | | | RSA(2) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,497(3) | | | $800,027 | |
| | | | | PA(3) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,497 | | | 18,994 | | | 9,497(4) | | | $800,027 | |
| | | | | ACI(4) | | | | | | — | | | $632,500 | | | $1,265,000 | | | — | | | | | | | | | — | | | — | |
| | G. DeMartino | | | RSA(2) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,265(3) | | | $275,044 | |
| | | | | PA(3) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,265 | | | 6,530 | | | 3,265(4) | | | $275,044 | |
| | | | | ACI(4) | | | | | | — | | | 300,000 | | | $540,000 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | V. Paperiello | | | RSA(2) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,897(3) | | | $412,523 | |
| | | | | PA(3) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,897 | | | 9,794 | | | 4,897(4) | | | $412,523 | |
| | | | | ACI(4) | | | | | | — | | | $301,350 | | | $602,700 | | | — | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| | T. LaFrance | | | RSA(2) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,265(3) | | | $275,044 | |
| | | | | PA(3) | | | 1/2/22 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 3,265 | | | 6,530 | | | 3,265(4) | | | $275,044 | |
| | | | | ACI(4) | | | | | | — | | | $226,600 | | | $407,880 | | | — | | | | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
(1)
| (1)Type of Awards are – Restricted Stock Award (RSA); Performance Award (PA); and Annual Cash Incentive (ACI). |
(2)
| Restricted stock that vests ratably annually on the date of grant, typically over five years.years, subject to the participant’s continued service to the Company through the applicable vesting date. |
(3)
| Performance awards that vest after a 3 year performance period. Payout is based upon a three-year average of the ratio of EBITDA as a percent of gross margin. The maximum payout of these awards would be achieved if EBITDA as a percent of gross margin meets or exceeds the 200% level metric as determined by the Compensation Committee. However, because the results of 2023 and 2024 currently are undeterminable, these awards could continue to result in payouts of between 0 and the maximum amounts. Target shares denote a 100% payout; and maximum shares denote a 200% payout. |
(4)
| Our annual cash incentive is determined with the assistance of advice from Korn Ferry. With the exception of our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer, the value of the target award is generally set at 50 - 70% of salary. This incentive is based solely on EPS for our Chief Executive Officer and our President and Chief Operating Officer. For our other Named Executive Officers, 80% of this incentive is based on EPS and 20% is based on individual performance compared against certain predetermined personal goals. |
Narrative Description for Summary Compensation and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Tables
Short-Term Incentives
A summary of the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan is set forth above under the heading, “Annual Cash Incentive.”
Long-Term Incentives
As part of the annual long-term incentive compensation package, our Compensation Committee grants restricted Class A Common StockShares to our executive officers.Named Executive Officers. Generally, these awards are based on merit and the Hay Group survey andtypically vest over three or five years. The Company has historically made an annual grant of time-based restricted stock to its executive officers.Named Executive Officers and, since 2018 performance-based restricted stock has also been part of the long-term incentive. Our Compensation Committee reviews management’s recommendation and
TABLE OF CONTENTS
approves the restricted stock awards for each Section 16 officer.Named Executive Officer. These restricted shares are entitled to dividends, if any, to the same extent as ordinary shares, but the dividends are restricted to the same extent as the underlying security. Once the restricted stock vests, any dividends paid on that stock also vest.
Agreements with our Named Executive Officers
We do not have employment agreements with our executive officers.Named Executive Officers.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT
DECEMBER 31, 2016| | | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Incentive | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Plan | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Incentive Plan | | | Equity Incentive | |
| | | Number | | | | | | | Awards: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Market | | | Awards: | | | Plan Awards: | |
| | | of | | | Number of | | | Number of | | | | | | | | | | | Number of | | | Value of | | | Number of | | | Market or Payout | |
| | | Securities | | | Securities | | | Securities | | | | | | | | | | | Shares or | | | Shares or | | | Unearned | | | Value of | |
| | | Underlying | | | Underlying | | | Underlying | | | | | | | | | | | Units of | | | Units of | | | Shares, Units or | | | Unearned Shares, | |
| | | Unexercised | | | Unexercised | | | Unexercised | | | Option | | | | | | | Stock That | | | Stock That | | | Other Rights | | | Units or Other | |
| | | Options | | | Options | | | Unearned | | | Exercise | | | Option | | | Have Not | | | Have Not | | | That Have Not | | | Rights That Have | |
| | | (#) | | | (#) | | | Options | | | Price | | | Expiration | | | Vested | | | Vested | | | Vested | | | Not Vested | |
| Name | | Exercisable | | | Unexercisable | | | (#) | | | ($) | | | Date | | | (#) | | | ($) | | | (#) | | | ($) | |
| David P. Yeager | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30,000 | (1) | | | 1,312,500 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,360 | (2) | | | 847,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13,200 | (3) | | | 577,500 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,800 | (4) | | | 385,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,400 | (5) | | | 192,500 | | | | | | | | | |
| Terri A. Pizzuto | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 18,000 | (1) | | | 787,500 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 13,200 | (2) | | | 577,500 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,000 | (3) | | | 393,750 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,000 | (4) | | | 262,500 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,000 | (5) | | | 131,250 | | | | | | | | | |
| Donald G. Maltby | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 20,000 | (1) | | | 875,000 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12,000 | (6) | | | 525,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| James J. Damman | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,000 | (1) | | | 656,250 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10,560 | (2) | | | 462,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 6,000 | (3) | | | 262,500 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,000 | (4) | | | 175,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,000 | (5) | | | 87,500 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,989 | (7) | | | 130,769 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,117 | (8) | | | 92,619 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 564 | (9) | | | 24,675 | | | | | | | | | |
| David L. Marsh | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,000 | (1) | | | 656,250 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 10,560 | (2) | | | 462,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,200 | (3) | | | 315,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,800 | (4) | | | 210,000 | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,400 | (5) | | | 105,000 | | | | | | | | | |
The table below sets forth information regarding equity awards granted and held by our Named Executive Officers as of the end of fiscal year 2022. We have omitted from this table the columns relating to “Option Awards” because they are inapplicable.
| | D. Yeager | | | 13,058(2) | | | $1,037,980 | | | 26,116(3) | | | $2,075,961 | |
| | | | | 16,000(4) | | | $1,271,840 | | | 40,000(5) | | | $3,179,600 | |
| | | | | 12,000(6) | | | $953,880 | | | 40,000 (7) | | | $3,179,600 | |
| | | | | 8,000(8) | | | $635,920 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 4,000(10) | | | $317,960 | | | | | | | |
| | P. Yeager | | | 9,497(2) | | | $754,917 | | | 18,994(3) | | | $1,509,833 | |
| | | | | 8,000 (4) | | | $635,920 | | | 20,000(5) | | | $1,589,800 | |
| | | | | 4,800(6) | | | $381,552 | | | 16,000(7) | | | $1,271,840 | |
| | | | | 2,400(8) | | | $190,776 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 1,074 (9) | | | $85,372 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 1,200(10) | | | $95,388 | | | | | | | |
| | G. DeMartino | | | 3,265(2) | | | $259,535 | | | 6,530(3) | | | $519,070 | |
| | | | | 3,200(4) | | | $254,368 | | | 8,000(5) | | | $635,920 | |
| | | | | 2,286(6) | | | $181,714 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 2,150(8) | | | $170,904 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 813(10) | | | $64,625 | | | | | | | |
| | V. Paperiello | | | 4,897(2) | | | $389,263 | | | 9,794(3) | | | $778,525 | |
| | | | | 4,800(4) | | | $381,552 | | | 12,000(5) | | | $953,880 | |
| | | | | 3,000(6) | | | $238,470 | | | 10,000(7) | | | $794,900 | |
| | | | | 1,600(8) | | | $127,184 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 644(9) | | | $51,192 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 800(10) | | | $63,592 | | | | | | | |
| | T. LaFrance | | | 3,265(2) | | | $259,535 | | | 6,530(3) | | | $519,070 | |
| | | | | 5,000(11) | | | $397,450 | | | | | | | |
(1)
| (1)Computed by multiplying the number of shares by $79.49, which was the closing market price of one Class A Share on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of the fiscal year, as reported by Nasdaq. |
(2)
| Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on January 2, 20162022 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over five years. |
(3)
| (2)Performance award remaining from grant made on January 2, 2022 that are subject to a three-year vesting performance period. The number of shares reported assumes a 200% payout of the performance award based on performance to date above the maximum threshold. |
(4)
| Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on January 2, 20152021 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over five years. |
(5)
| (3)Performance awards remaining from a grant made on January 2, 2021 that are subject to a three-year vesting performance period. The number of shares reported assumes a 200% payout of the performance award based on performance to date above the maximum threshold. |
(6)
| Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on January 2, 20142020 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over five years. |
(7)
| (4)Performance awards remaining from a grant made on January 2, 2020 that are subject to a three-year vesting performance period. The number of shares reported assumes a 200% payout of the performance award based on performance to date above the maximum threshold. |
(8)
| Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on January 2, 20132019 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over five years. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| (5)(9)
| Restricted stock remaining from a grant made to Mr. Phillip Yeager and Mr. Vincent Paperiello on January 2, 2012November 9, 2018 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over five years. |
| (6)(10)
| Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on September 16, 2015 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over three years. |
| (7) | Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on February 22, 2014January 2, 2018 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over five years. |
| (8)(11)
| Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on February 22, 2013September 1, 2021 that cliff vests ratably annually on the date of the grant over fiveafter three years. |
| (9) | Restricted stock remaining from a grant made on February 22, 2012 that vests ratably annually on the date of grant over five years. |
20162022 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED
The table below sets forth information regarding awards that vested in our Named Executive Officers during 2022. We have omitted from this table the columns relating to “Option Awards” because they are inapplicable.
D. Yeager | | | 24,000 | | | 2,021,760 |
P. Yeager | | | 9,074 | | | 756,758 |
G. DeMartino | | | 4,364 | | | 367,623 |
V. Paperiello | | | 6,044 | | | 504,568 |
T. LaFrance | | | — | | | — |
(1)
| Represents the gross number of shares acquired upon vesting of restricted stock, without deduction for shares that may have been withheld to satisfy applicable tax withholding obligations. |
(2)
| Computed by multiplying the number of shares by the closing market price of one Class A Share on the vesting date as reported by Nasdaq. The vesting date for all the shares reported was January 2, 2022 except as follows: P. Yeager (1,074 shares vested on November 9, 2022) and V. Paperiello (644 shares vested on November 9, 2022). |
We have omitted the Pension Benefits table because it is inapplicable.
| | | Option Awards | | | Stock Awards | |
| | | Number of | | | | | | | Number of | | | | | |
| | | Shares | | | | | | | Shares | | | | | |
| | | Acquired | | | Value Realized | | | Acquired | | | Value Realized | |
| | | on Exercise | | | On Exercise | | | on Vesting | | | on Vesting | |
| Name | | (#) | | | ($) | | | (#) | | | ($) | |
| David P. Yeager | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,742 | | | | 716,399 | |
| Terri A. Pizzuto | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,506 | | | | 478,803 | |
| Donald G. Maltby | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,000 | | | | 244,020 | |
| James J. Damman | | | — | | | | — | | | | 12,926 | | | | 447,293 | |
| David L. Marsh | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,506 | | | | 379,123 | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
20162022 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION| Name | | Executive Contributions in Last FY
($)(1) | | | Registrant Contributions in Last FY ($)(2) | | | Aggregate Earnings in Last FY ($)(3) | | | Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions ($) | | | Aggregate Balance at Last FYE ($)(4) | |
| David P. Yeager | | | 560,218 | | | | 24,000 | | | | 80,797 | | | | 477,661 | | | | 3,205,445 | |
| Terri A. Pizzuto | | | 45,000 | | | | 13,500 | | | | 38,730 | | | | — | | | | 707,884 | |
| Donald G. Maltby | | | 61,000 | | | | 16,800 | | | | 6,640 | | | | 27,871 | | | | 189,302 | |
| James J. Damman (5) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 14,863 | | | | — | | | | 405,936 | |
| David L. Marsh | | | 217,359 | | | | 10,800 | | | | 2,228 | | | | 111,204 | | | | 617,003 | |
Information regarding each Named Executive officer’s participation in our DCP is included in the following table. The material terms of the plan are described after the table. Please also see “Perquisites and Other Compensation” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above.
D. Yeager | | | $285,000 | | | $21,750 | | | $(540,917) | | | $525,814 | | | $3,796,533 |
P. Yeager | | | $37,924 | | | $18,962 | | | $(63,816) | | | $-0- | | | $344,222 |
G. DeMartino | | | $10,080 | | | $5,040 | | | $(87,173) | | | $-0- | | | $359,510 |
V. Paperiello | | | $25,821 | | | $12,910 | | | $(1,635) | | | $-0- | | | $24,185 |
T. LaFrance | | | $27,160 | | | $13,593 | | | $(1,789) | | | $-0- | | | $25,397 |
| (1)
| Executive contributions during 2022 are included in Salary“Salary” in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(2)
| (2) | Our Company contributions are a match made subject to a cliff vesting requirement as more fully explained below. Our Company contributions are included in All“All Other CompensationCompensation” in 2022 in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(3)
| (3) | None of these earningsThese amounts are includednot reported in the Summary Compensation Table as these are earnings on investments made in various commonly available investment vehicles.because they do not represent above-market or preferential earnings. |
(4)
| (4) | The amount of compensation inOf the aggregate balance that wasamounts reported, the following were previously reported as compensation for years prior to 2022 in the 2016a Summary Compensation Table is $584,218 for Mr.Table: D. Yeager $58,500 for Ms. Pizzuto, $32,850 for Mr. Maltby($2,328,169), P. Yeager ($157,662) and $228,159 for Mr. Marsh. The amount of compensation in the aggregate balance that was reported as compensation in the 2015 Summary Compensation Table is $171,495 for Mr. Yeager, $54,607 for Ms. Pizzuto and $95,925 for Mr. Maltby and $187,416 for Mr. Marsh. The amount of compensation in the aggregate balance that was reported as compensation in the 2014 Summary Compensation Table is $173,438 for Mr. Yeager, $49,407 for Ms. Pizzuto and $109,802 for Mr. Maltby. |
| (5) | Mr. Damman participates in the Mode Plan (as defined below)G. DeMartino ($71,183). |
We adopted our current Deferred Compensation Plan effective January 1, 2005. We allow a select group of management and highly compensated employees to make contributions to our Deferred Compensation Plan. We also adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan effective April 1, 2011 in connection with the Mode acquisition (the “Mode Plan”). The Mode Plan was created to allow certain key Mode employees to continue deferring into a non-qualified plan for the remainder of 2011. Of our current named executive officers, only Mr. Damman participates in the Mode Plan. On December 31, 2011, the Mode Plan was closed and there will be no new contributions made into the Mode Plan.
Our Deferred Compensation Plan is funded and does not provide for a fixed rate of return. Each participating employee selects from a range of investment options. We then provide an investment return equal
Pursuant to the
return from the selected investment options. The investment options which may be selected by theDCP, participating employees
track commonly available investment vehicles, including mutual funds, bond funds and money market funds. Participating employees can
contributedefer up to 50% of their base salary and up to 90% of their annual cash
incentive under the Deferred Compensation Plan.incentive. The Deferred Compensation PlanDCP also includes a match by ourthe Company. The match currently is equal to 50% of the first 6% of contributions to the plan with a maximum match equivalent to 3% of base salary. The match vests overat the end of three years on a cliff basis.years. The Company match, if vested, and earnings thereon are paid out seven months after separation from service in either a lump sum or over a period of up to ten years, at the employee’s election. The match is subject to forfeiture if the participant leaves the Company and goes to work for a competitor.
The DCP is funded and does not provide for a fixed rate of return. The amounts deferred or contributed to the DCP are credited to a liability account, which is then invested at the participant’s option in an account that mirrors the performance of a fund or funds selected by the Compensation Committee and reviewed by the Company’s Retirement Committee. The investment options that a participating employee may select track commonly available investment vehicles, including mutual funds, bond funds and money market funds. Each participating employee selects from a range of investment options. We then provide an investment return equal to the return from the selected investment options.
The employee’s contributions and earnings thereon are paid out upon separation from service or at a predetermined date and may be paid out in a lump sum or over a period of up to ten years. The match is subject to forfeiture if the participant leaves the Company and goes to work for a competitor.
Our Mode Plan is also funded and does not provide for a fixed rate of return. Each participating employee selects from a range of investment options. We then provide an investment return equal to the return from the selected investment options. The investment options which may be selected by the participating employees track commonly available investment vehicles, including mutual funds, bond funds and money market funds. The Mode Plan included a match by our Company equal to 50% of the first 10% of contributions to the plan with a maximum match equivalent to 5% of compensation. The match was fully vested once made. The Company match and earnings thereon are paid out seven months after separation from service in either a lump sum or over a period of up to fifteen years, at the employee’s election. The employee’s contributions and earnings thereon are paid out upon separation from service or at a predetermined date and may be paid out in a lump sum or over a period of up to fifteen years.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Potential PayoutsPayments Upon Termination or Change ofin Control As required, in the following section we disclose the amount that would have been earned by our named executive officers assuming a change
ofin control
or a termination due to death or disability on December 31,
2016.David P. Yeager, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Change of Control
Mr. Yeager has been granted various awards of2022.
Pursuant to their current award agreements under Long-Term Incentive Plans, time-based restricted stock
undergranted to our
Long-Term Incentive Plans. Pursuant to his award agreements, this restricted stock vestsnamed executive officers would vest upon a change
of control. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Yeager owned 75,760 shares ofin control event. Time-based restricted stock
subjectawards also vest on death or disability, and may vest upon a retirement (generally, the date of an executive’s termination for reasons other than due to
vesting requirements. Assumingdeath or disability or “for cause,” on or after the
triggering event took place onattainment of age 55, or age 50 plus 10 continuous years of service) in the
last business day of 2016, the valuediscretion of the
Compensation Committee. Performance-based restricted stock
would have been $3,314,500.Mr. Yeager isawards granted under the Company’s 2017 Long Term Incentive Plan also may vest, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee, on death, disability, retirement, or a participantchange in control event (with or without regard to the satisfaction of the applicable performance measures). The Company’s 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides that performance-based restricted stock awards shall vest on a change in control event at the greater of the target level of performance or the actual level of performance determined as of the date of the change in control. No performance-based restricted stock awards were granted under the Company’s 2022 Long-Term Incentive plan in 2022. Additionally, our Deferred Compensation Plan. Our Deferred Compensation PlanDCP provides for the vesting of the Company match and any earnings thereon upon a change ofin control. Assuming a change of control as defined under this plan occurred on December 31, 2016, a total of $47,417 worth of Company matching contributions and interestNo Named Executive Officers would be entitled to receive any cash severance amounts or earnings thereon would have vested.
Terri A. Pizzuto, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Change of Control
Ms. Pizzuto has been granted various awards of restricted stock under our Long-Term Incentive Plans. Pursuant to her award agreements, this restricted stock vests upon a change of control. As of December 31, 2016, Ms. Pizzuto owned 49,200 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements. Assuming the triggering event took place on the last business day of 2016, the value of the restricted stock would have been $2,152,500.
Ms. Pizzuto is a participant in our Deferred Compensation Plan. Our Deferred Compensation Plan provides for theaccelerated vesting of the Company match and any earnings thereon uponequity awards in connection with a changetermination of control. Assuming a change of control as defined under this plan occurred on December 31, 2016, a total of $27,614 worth of Company matching contributions and interestemployment other than due to death or earnings thereon would have vested.
Donald G. Maltby, President and Chief Operating Officer
Change of Control
Mr. Maltby has been granted various awards of restricted stock under our Long-Term Incentive Plans. Pursuant to his award agreements, this restricted stock vests upon a change of control. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Maltby owned 32,000 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements. Assuming the triggering event took place on the last business day of 2016, the value of the restricted stock would have been $1,400,000.
Mr. Maltby is a participant in our Deferred Compensation Plan. Our Deferred Compensation Plan provides for the vesting of the Company match and any earnings thereon upon a change of control. Assuming a change of control as defined under this plan occurred on December 31, 2016, a total of $34,407 worth of Company matching contributions and interest or earnings thereon would have vested
James J. Damman, President Mode Transportation
Change of Control
Mr. Damman has been granted various awards of restricted stock under our Long-Term Incentive Plans. Pursuant to his award agreements, this restricted stock vests upon a change of control. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Damman owned 43,230 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements. Assuming the triggering event took place on the last business day of 2016, the value of the restricted stock would have been $1,891,313.
disability. D. Yeager | | | $8,435,161 | | | $44,517 | | | $8,479,678 |
P. Yeager | | | $4,329,661 | | | $51,521 | | | $4,381,182 |
G. DeMartino | | | $1,508,641 | | | $17,529 | | | $1,526,170 |
V. Paperiello | | | $2,514,905 | | | $12,910 | | | $2,527,815 |
T. LaFrance | | | $916,520 | | | $13,593 | | | $930,113 |
David L. Marsh, Chief Highway Solutions Officer
Change of Control
Mr. Marsh has been granted various awards of restricted stock under our Long-Term Incentive Plans. Pursuant to his award agreements, this restricted stock vests upon a change of control. As of December 31, 2016, Mr. Marsh owned 39,960 shares of restricted stock subject to vesting requirements. Assuming the triggering event took place on the last business day of 2016, the value of the restricted stock would have been $1,748,250.
Mr. Marsh is a participant in our Deferred Compensation Plan. Our Deferred Compensation Plan provides for the vesting of the Company match and any earnings thereon upon a change of control. Assuming a change of control as defined under this plan occurred on December 31, 2016, a total of $21,149 worth of Company matching contributions and interest or earnings thereon would have vested.
(1)
| As of December 31, 2022, our Named Executive Officers owned the following number of shares of unvested restricted stock: D. Yeager (106,116); P. Yeager (54,468); G. DeMartino (18,979); V. Paperiello (31,638); and T. LaFrance (11,530). The value of accelerated restricted stock reported in this column is determined by multiplying the number of unvested shares of restricted stock by $79.49, which was the closing market price of one Class A Share on December 30, 2022 as reported by Nasdaq. |
Definition of “Change
ofin Control”
For purposes of the foregoing discussion, a change ofin control is defined under the Hub Group, Inc. 2022 Long-Term Incentive Plan as a change in the beneficial ownership of the Company’s voting stockClass A Shares or a change in the composition of the Board which occurs as follows: (i) Any “person” (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act) who is not as of the date of this grant but lateror becomes a beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of stock of the CompanyClass A Shares representing 3050 percent or more of the total voting power of the Company’s then outstanding stock;Class A Shares; or (ii) A tender offer (for which a filing has been made with the SEC which purports to comply with the requirements of Section 14(d) of the Exchange Act and the corresponding SEC rules) is made for the stockClass A Shares, which has not been negotiated and approved by the Board and, for this purpose, the tender offer will be deemed to have occurred upon the closing of the Company,offer if, upon such closing, the person (using the definition in subparagraph (i) above) making the offer owns or has accepted for payment Class A Shares with 25 percent or more of the total voting power of the Class A Shares. For purposes of the DCP, the definition of a change in control is defined as a change in control that would constitute a change in control event under Section 409A of the Code. The definition of change in control under the Hub Group 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides, with respect to clause (ii) of the change in control definition described above, that a change in control will occur only if a tender offer (for which a filing has been made with the SEC which purports to comply with the requirements of Section 14(d) of the Exchange Act and the corresponding SEC rules) is made for the Class A Shares, which has not been negotiated and approved by the Board. In case of a tender offer described in this paragraph,above, the change in control will be deemed to have occurred upon the first to occur of (A) any time during the offer when the person (using the definition in subparagraph (i) above) making the offer owns or has accepted for payment stock of the CompanyClass A Shares with 25 percent or more of the total voting power of the Company’s stock,Class A Shares, or (B) three business days before the offer is to
TABLE OF CONTENTS
terminate unless the offer is withdrawn first, if the person making the offer could own, by the terms of the offer plus any shares owned by this person, stock with 50 percent or more of the total voting power of the Company’s stock when the offer terminates; or (iii)
Individualsindividuals who were the Board’s nominees for election as directors of the Company immediately prior to a meeting of the stockholders of the Company involving a contest for the election of directors shall not constitute a majority of the Board following the election.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth a summaryvarying definition of change in control between the 2022 Hub Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan and the 2017 Hub Group, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan has no effect on the amount of the compensation for services rendered to the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 for the Company’s independent directors.
| Name | | Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) | | | Stock Awards ($)(1) | | | Option Awards ($) | | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | | | All Other Compensation ($) | | | Total ($) | |
| Gary D. Eppen | | | 90,000 | | | | 181,225 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,700 | (2) | | | 273,925 | |
| Charles R. Reaves | | | 90,000 | | | | 181,225 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 271,225 | |
| Martin P. Slark | | | 90,000 | | | | 181,225 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 271,225 | |
| Jonathan P. Ward | | | 90,000 | | | | 181,225 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 271,225 | |
| James C. Kenny (3) | | | 60,000 | | | | 160,586 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 220,586 | |
| (1) | Consists of the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards made by our Company in 2016 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The amounts expensed in 2016 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 with respect to restricted stock awards made by our Company each with a vesting period of three years are $194,360 for Messrs. Eppen, Reaves, Slark and Ward, and $35,686 for Mr. Kenny. |
| (2) | Mr. Eppen contributed to our Deferred Compensation Plan in 2016 and received a match of $2,700 for 2016. |
| (3) | Mr. Kenny’s compensation was pro-rated to reflect his appointment in May 2016. |
As of December 31, 2016, Messrs. Eppen, Reaves, Slark and Ward each had 5,500 shares of restricted stock remaining from a grant made on January 2, 2016 that vests ratably over three years, 3,666 shares of restricted stock remaining from a grant made on January 2, 2015 that vests ratably over three years and 1,666 shares of restricted stock remaining from a grant made on January 2, 2014 that vests ratably over three years. Mr. Kenny had 4,125 shares remaining from a grant made on May 20, 2016 that vests ratably over three years. No directors have options.
Directors who are not our employees received $90,000 for serving as a director during 2016. Directors who are our employees do not receive additional compensation for such services. Both employee and non-employee directors are reimbursed for their travel and other expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board of Directors or committees thereof. In connection with their 2016 compensation package, on January 2, 2016, Messrs. Eppen, Reaves, Slark and Ward each received a grant of 5,500 shares of restricted Class A Common Stock with a value on the date of grant of $181,225. In connection with Mr. Kenny’s 2016 compensation package, on May 20, 2016, he received a grant of 4,125 shares of restricted Class A Common Stock with a value on the date of grant of $160,586. The restricted stock vests ratably over a three-year period.
payments set forth above.
Share Ownership Requirements for Non-Employee DirectorsTo directly align the interests of our non-employee directors with the interests of the stockholders, our Board adopted a policy that requires each non-employee director to maintain a minimum ownership interest in the Company. The policy was amended in February 2017 to increase each director’s ownership requirement of Company stock to a value of at least three times his annual retainer. Each director has five years to meet this requirement. Until they do, directors must retain a minimum of 25% of the stock granted to them in any one year.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Except as disclosed in “Transactions with Management and Others,” none of Mses. Boosalis, Dykstra and Ross, Messrs. Flannery Kenny, McNitt, Slark, and Yablon, or our former directors Mr. Jonathan P. Ward and Charles Reaves, each of whom was a member of our Compensation Committee during all or a portion of 2022: (1) was at any time during 2022 an officer or employee, or was at any time prior to 2022 an officer, of Hub Group or any of our subsidiaries; or (2) had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Also, none of our executive officers serve, or in the past fiscal year have served, as a director or compensation committee (or equivalent committee) member of any entity that has an executive officer serving as a Hub Group director or Compensation Committee member.
Compensation Risk Considerations The Compensation Committee has concluded that the risks created by our overall compensation program are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
None.TABLE OF CONTENTS
Audit Committee ReportManagement has primary responsibility for
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
The following table and supporting graphics below set out information about the Company’s internal controlrelationship between “executive compensation actually paid” and certain financial reporting process, and for making an assessmentperformance measures of the effectivenessCompany for fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 as required under Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The information set forth below was not used by the Compensation Committee in setting compensation for our named executive officers as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
2022 | | | $5,821,094 | | | $6,165,035 | | | $2,113,244 | | | $2,348,334 | | | $154.98 | | | $140.02 | | | $356,948 | | | 70.6% |
2021 | | | $5,724,633 | | | $12,482,793 | | | $2,011,784 | | | $4,086,226 | | | $164.24 | | | $165.46 | | | $171,474 | | | 61.5% |
2020 | | | $3,168,894 | | | $4,190,394 | | | $1,492,090 | | | $1,901,498 | | | $111.13 | | | $130.86 | | | $73,559 | | | 54.0% |
(1)
| Reflects compensation amounts reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” for our principal executive officer (“PEO”), former CEO (and current Executive Chairman), David P. Yeager, for the respective years shown. |
(2)
| “Compensation actually paid” to our PEO in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020 reflects the respective amounts set forth in column (b) of the table above, adjusted as set forth in the table below, as determined in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts reflected in column (b) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our PEO during the applicable year. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee regarding the PEO’s compensation for each fiscal year, please see the Compensation Discussion & Analysis sections of the proxy statements reporting pay for the fiscal years covered in the table above. |
PEO | | | D. Yeager | | | D. Yeager | | | D. Yeager |
SCT Total Compensation | | | $3,168,894 | | | $5,724,633 | | | $5,821,094 |
Less: Stock award values reported in SCT for the Covered Year | | | $(2,099,600) | | | $(2,280,000) | | | $(2,200,000) |
Plus: Year End Fair Value for Stock Awards Granted in the Covered Year | | | $2,576,400 | | | $5,054,400 | | | $3,113,941 |
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding Unvested Stock and Option Awards from Prior Years | | | $405,900 | | | $3,131,760 | | | $(570,000) |
Change in Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards from Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Year | | | $138,800 | | | $852,000 | | | — |
Less: Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards Forfeited during the Covered Year | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Compensation Actually Paid | | | $4,190,394 | | | $12,482,793 | | | $6,165,035 |
Equity Valuations: Performance-based restricted share unit grant date fair values are calculated using the stock price as of date of grant assuming target performance. Adjustments have been made using the stock price and performance accrual modifier as of year-end and as of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP is responsible for performing an independent auditdate of vest. Time-vested restricted share unit grant date fair values are calculated using the stock price as of date of grant. Adjustments have been made using the stock price as of year-end and as of each date of vest.
(3)
| Reflects compensation amounts reported in the “Summary Compensation Table” of the proxy statements reporting pay for the fiscal years covered in the table above for the following non-PEO NEOs: |
2022: Phillip D. Yeager, Geoffrey F. DeMartino, Vincent Paperiello, and Thomas P. LaFrance
2021: Phillip D. Yeager, Geoffrey F. DeMartino, Vava R. Dimond, and Vincent Paperiello
2020: Phillip D. Yeager, Terri A. Pizzuto, Geoffrey F. DeMartino, Vava R. Dimond and Douglas G. Beck
(4)
| Average “compensation actually paid” for our non-PEO NEOs in each of 2022, 2021 and 2020 reflects the respective amounts set forth in column (d) of the table above, adjusted as set forth in the table below, as determined in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts reflected in column (d) of the table above do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to our non-PEO NEOs during the applicable year. For information regarding the decisions made by our Compensation Committee regarding the non-PEO NEOs’ compensation for each fiscal year, please the Compensation Discussion and Analysis sections of the proxy statements reporting pay for the fiscal years covered in the table above. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Non-PEO NEOs | | | See Footnote 3 above | | | See Footnote 3 above | | | See Footnote 3 above |
SCT Total Compensation | | | $1,492,090 | | | $2,011,784 | | | $2,113,244 |
Less: Stock award values reported in SCT for the Covered Year | | | $(889,600) | | | $(826,500) | | | $(881,319) |
Plus: Year End Fair Value for Stock Awards Granted in the Covered Year | | | $1,084,867 | | | $1,832,220 | | | $1,247,437 |
Change in Fair Value of Outstanding Unvested Stock and Option Awards from Prior Years | | | $166,879 | | | $867,639 | | | $(127,973) |
Change in Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards from Prior Years that Vested in the Covered Year | | | $47,262 | | | $201,083 | | | $(3,054) |
Less: Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards Forfeited during the Covered Year | | | — | | | — | | | — |
Compensation Actually Paid | | | $1,901,498 | | | $4,086,226 | | | $2,348,334 |
Equity Valuations: Performance-based restricted share unit grant date fair values are calculated using the stock price as of date of grant assuming target performance. Adjustments have been made using the stock price and performance accrual modifier as of year-end and as of the
Company’s (i) consolidated financial statements in accordance withdate of vest. Time-vested restricted share unit grant date fair values are calculated using the
standardsstock price as of
date of grant. Adjustments have been made using the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”)stock price as of year-end and
(ii) the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and to issue an opinion on those financial statements and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes.The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s quarterly and annual audited financial statements with management. The Company has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communication with Audit Committees, as amended, as adopted by the PCAOB. The Audit Committee has also received from Ernst & Young LLP the written communication and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Ernst & Young LLP’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP their independence. Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Boardeach date of Directors that the December 31, 2016 audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2016.
vest. (5)
| AUDIT COMMITTEE |
| |
| Gary D. Eppen, Chairman |
| Charles R. Reaves |
| Martin P. Slark |
| Jonathan P. Ward
James C. Kenny
|
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The Audit Committee has selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent accountant of the Company. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. They will also be available to respond to appropriate questions.
The fees billed by Ernst & Young in 2016 and 2015 for services provided to us were as follows:
| | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| Audit Fees (1) | | $ | 1,392,757 | | | $ | 1,340,000 | |
| Audit-Related Fees (2) | | $ | 397,180 | | | | — | |
| Tax Fees (3) | | $ | 37,259 | | | $ | 21,869 | |
| All Other Fees (4) | | | — | | | | — | |
| TOTAL | | $ | 1,827,196 | | | $ | 1,361,869 | |
| (1) | “Audit Fees” areFor the aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young for professional services renderedrelevant fiscal year, represents the cumulative total shareholder return (TSR) of the Company for the auditmeasurement periods ending on December 31 of each of 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. |
(6)
| For the relevant fiscal year, represents the cumulative TSR of the Nasdaq Trucking and Transportation Index (“Peer Group TSR”) for the measurement periods ending on December 31 of each of 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. |
(7)
| Reflects “Net Income” in the company’s Consolidated Statements Income and Comprehensive Income included in the Company’s annual financial statementsAnnual Reports on Form 10-K for each of the years ended December 31, 20162022, 2021 and December 31, 2015, the audit2020. |
(8)
| Company-selected Measure is EBITDA as a percent of gross margin, which is described below. |
Relationship between Pay and Performance.
Below are graphs showing the relationship of “compensation actually paid” to our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers in 2020, 2021 and 2022 to (1) TSR of both the Company and the Nasdaq Trucking and Transportation Index, (2) the Company’s net income and (3) EBITDA as a percent of gross margin.
“Compensation actually paid,” as required under SEC rules, reflects adjusted values to unvested and vested equity awards during the years shown in the table based on year-end stock prices, various accounting valuation assumptions, and projected performance modifiers but does not reflect actual amounts paid out for those awards. Compensation actually paid generally fluctuates due to stock price achievement and varying levels of projected and actual achievement of performance goals.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Listed below are the financial performance measures which in our assessment represent the most important financial performance measures we use to link compensation actually paid to our named executive officers, for 2022, to Company performance.
| | EBITDA as a percent of gross margin | | | A non-GAAP financial measure that consists of EBITDA (as defined below in this table) divided by Gross Margin (as defined below in this table) | |
| | Diluted EPS | | | Diluted Earnings per Share | |
| | EBITDA | | | A non-GAAP financial measure that consists of income from continuing operations before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization | |
| | Gross Margin | | | Revenue minus transportation costs | |
| | Operating income | | | Revenue minus transportation costs and costs and expenses | |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
As required by Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”). This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below.
In 2022, the annual total compensation of the employee identified at median of our company (other than our CEO), was $66,750; and
the annual total compensation of the CEO during 2022 for purposes of determining the CEO Pay Ratio was $5,821,094, as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table.
Based on this information, for 2022, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was estimated to be 87 to 1.
When identifying the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of the “median employee,” we examined our employee population as of November 15, 2022 utilizing the methodology and the material assumptions, adjustments, and estimates below:
our employee population for purposes of calculating the pay ratio disclosure was 5,844 after excluding, pursuant to SEC rules, 20 employees who work in Canada or Mexico and 800 employees who work for TAGG Holdco, LLC, which the Company acquired in 2022;
To identify the median compensated employee, we used W-2 Box 5 Medicare wages for the period from January 1, 2022 (the first day of 2022) through December 31, 2022 (the last day of 2022), with such amounts annualized for full-time permanent employees that were not employed by us for the entire year; and
the median employee’s annual total compensation was calculated using the same methodology we use for our CEO as set forth in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement.
The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The following table sets forth the amount of Class A Shares and Class B Shares beneficially owned by the listed persons as of March 29, 2023. For purposes of this table, a person “beneficially owns” a security if that person has or shares voting or investment power or has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Unless otherwise noted, to our knowledge, these persons have sole investment and voting power over the shares listed. Percentage computations are based upon 32,799,567 Class A Shares and 574,903 Class B Shares, respectively, outstanding as of the Record Date. Beneficial ownership of Class B Shares is based on the stock ledger maintained by the Company as of the Record Date.
David P. Yeager(1)(2) | | | 32,543 | | | *% | | | 351,748 | | | 61.2% |
Phillip D. Yeager | | | 5,906 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Geoffrey F. DeMartino | | | 16,096 | | | | | | | | | |
Vincent C. Paperiello | | | 39,861 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Thomas P. LaFrance | | | 329 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Peter B. McNitt | | | 17,650 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Mary H. Boosalis | | | 19,197 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Michael E. Flannery(3) | | | 2,139 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Lisa Dykstra(3) | | | — | | | * | | | — | | | * |
James Kenny(3) | | | 23,939 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Janell R. Ross | | | 7,299 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Martin P. Slark | | | 114,787 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
Gary Yablon | | | 5,000 | | | * | | | — | | | * |
All directors, nominees and executive officers (17 people) | | | 315,108 | | | * | | | 351,748 | | | 61.2% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
DPY 2015 Exempt Children’s Trust(4) | | | — | | | * | | | 176,276 | | | 30.7 |
David P. Yeager 2020 Hub Exempt Trust(5) | | | — | | | * | | | 46,879 | | | 8.1 |
BlackRock, Inc.(6) | | | 6,125,902 | | | 18.7% | | | — | | | * |
The Vanguard Group (7) | | | 3,642,545 | | | 11.1% | | | — | | | * |
Dimensional Fund Advisors L.P.(8) | | | 2,448,115 | | | 7.5% | | | — | | | * |
*
| Represents less than 1% of the effectivenessoutstanding Class A Shares. |
(1)
| All shares are subject to the terms of the Company’s internal control over financial reportingDPY Stockholders’ Agreement, dated February 22, 2023 (the “DPY Stockholders’ Agreement”). Pursuant to DPY Stockholders’ Agreement David P. Yeager and trusts controlled by him as trustee have agreed to vote all of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015,their Class B Shares in accordance with the reviewsvote of the financial statements includedholders of a majority of such shares subject to the agreement. Mr. David P. Yeager owns or controls as trustee a majority of the Class B Shares subject to the DPY Stockholders’ Agreement and therefore has the power to control the voting of all Class B Shares subject to the agreement. See “Solicitation, Meeting and Voting Information - How will the Class B shares be voted at the Annual Meeting?” for more details. Except as provided in footnote 2, each of the Yeager family members disclaims beneficial ownership of the Class B Shares held by the other Yeager family members. |
(2)
| Includes 141, 561 Class B Shares owned by David. P. Yeager, 51,624 Class B Shares owned by the Laura C. Yeager 2015 GST Trust, 51,624 Class B Shares owned by the Matthew D. Yeager 2015 GST Trust and 51,624 Class B Shares owned by the Phillip D. Yeager 2015 GST Trust, 15,259 Class B Shares owned by the David P. Yeager NonExempt Trust Created under the Phillip C. Yeager 1994 Trust, 28,339 Class B Shares owned by Phillip D. Yeager, 11,090 Class B Shares owned by Matthew Yeager and 628 Class B Shares owned by Laura Y. Grusecki, to which David P. Yeager may be deemed to have shared voting discretion pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement. See Note 1. |
(3)
| Mr. Flannery was appointed a director of the Company effective April 1, 2022. Ms. Dykstra and Mr. Yablon were each appointed a director, effective May 24, 2022. |
(4)
| Trustees of the DPY 2015 Exempt Children’s Trust are Phillip D. Yeager, Matthew D. Yeager and Laura Y. Grusecki. No one Trustee has the power to control the voting or disposition of the Class B Shares held by the trust, but the disposition of Class B shares requires unanimous agreement of the Trustees and the voting of the Class B Shares requires an agreement by the majority of the Trustees. |
(5)
| Trustees of the David P. Yeager 2020 Hub Exempt Trust are Julia E. Yeager, Phillip D. Yeager, Matthew D. Yeager and Laura Y. Grusecki. Julia E. Yeager has the power to individually control the voting and disposition of shares held by the trust while she is serving as a trustee. Julia E. Yeager is the wife of David P. Yeager. Each of the trustees disclaims beneficial ownership of the Class B shares held by the trust except to the extent of his or her pecuniary interest therein. |
(6)
| Information contained in the Company’s quarterly reportstable above and this footnote is based on Form 10-Q during 2016 and 2015, and consultationa report on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 26, 2023 by BlackRock, Inc. (“Blackrock”). Blackrock is beneficial owner of 6,125,902 Class A Shares, with sole dispositive power with respect to various accounting6,125,902 Class A Shares and financial reporting matters during 2016 and 2015.sole voting power with respect to 6,125,902 Class A Shares. BlackRock’s address is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(7)
| (2) | “Audit-Related Fees” include fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit and not includedInformation contained in the “audit fees” described above.table above and this footnote is based on a report on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023 by The 2016 Audit-Related Fees relateVanguard Group, Inc. (“Vanguard”). Vanguard is the beneficial owner of 3,642,545 Class A Shares, with sole dispositive power with respect to assistance3,586,583 Class A Shares, sole voting power with financial due-diligence forrespect to 0 Class A Shares, shared voting power with respect to 23,397 Class A Shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 55,962 Class A Shares. Vanguard’s address is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. |
(8)
| Information contained in the table above and this footnote is based on a potential acquisition.report on Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2023 by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”). Dimensional is the beneficial owner of 2,448,115 Class A Shares, with sole dispositive power with respect to 2,4448,115 Class A Shares and sole voting power with respect to 2,411,676 Class A Shares. The address of Dimensional is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746. |
| (3) | “Tax Fees” are fees for tax services billed by Ernst & Young. |
| (4) | There were no non-audit services in 2016 and 2015. |
The Audit Committee must pre-approve any audit or any permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s independent auditors, and has established pre-approval policies and procedures for such services. Permissible non-audit services are those allowed under the regulations of the SEC. The Audit Committee may approve certain specific categories of permissible non-audit services within an aggregated budgeted dollar limit. The Audit Committee must approve on a project-by-project basis any permissible non-audit services that do not fall within a pre- approved category, or pre-approved permissible non-audit services that exceed the previously approved fees. All services provided by Ernst & Young during 2016 were approved by the Audit Committee and were permissible under applicable laws and regulations and will continue to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee.TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ONTO APPROVE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATIONAt last year’s annual meeting,
In accordance with the Company providedSEC’s rules, we provide our stockholders with the opportunity to cast an advisory vote regarding the compensation ofpaid to our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as disclosed in the proxy statementstatement. We submit this proposal for the 2016 Annual Meeting.a non-binding vote on an annual basis. At our 20162022 Annual Meeting, our stockholders overwhelmingly approved the proposal, with more thanover 98% of the votes cast voting in favor of the proposal. In light of the high level of approval that we received in 2016, we concluded that no changes to our compensation policies and practices were warranted. Our Board has elected to hold a stockholder say on pay vote annually. Accordingly, this year the Companywe again seeksseek your advisory vote on our executive compensation programs. The Company asks that you supportto approve the compensation of our named executive officersNamed Executive Officers as disclosedwe have described in the Compensation“Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnalysis” section of this Proxy Statement and in the accompanying compensation tables and related narrative discussion in the “Executive Compensation” section of this Proxy Statement.
As discussed in detail in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section above, the Compensation Committee actively oversees our executive compensation program, adopting changes to the program and awarding compensation as appropriate to reflect Hub Group’s circumstances and to promote the main objectives of the program. Our compensation programs are designed to attract, retain, and motivate persons with superior ability, to reward outstanding performance, and to align the long-term interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our stockholders. Under these programs, our Named Executive Officers are rewarded for the achievement of specific annual and long-term goals and the accompanying tables containedrealization of increased stockholder value. We firmly believe that the information we have provided in this Proxy Statement.proxy statement demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed appropriately and is working to ensure that management’s interests are aligned with our stockholders’ interests to support long-term value creation.
Our Board is asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our Named Executive Officer compensation as described in this proxy statement in accordance with SEC rules by voting for this proposal. Because your vote is advisory, it will not
affect any compensation already paid or awarded to any officer nor will it be binding on
or overrule any decisions of the Board or the
Company. However,Compensation Committee. Nevertheless, our Board and the
Board will reviewCompensation Committee value our stockholders’ views and intend to consider the
voting results and take them into considerationoutcome of the vote, along with other relevant factors, when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.
We encourage stockholders This vote is not intended to reviewaddress any specific item of compensation, but rather the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and relatedoverall compensation of our named executive compensation tables. We believe our compensation program strikes the appropriate balance between using responsible pay practices and appropriately incentivizing our executives to create value for our stockholders.officers. This balanceadvisory vote is evidenced by the following:
| ● | A meaningful part of executive compensation is performance based, including our annual cash incentive, which is based primarilynot a vote on EPS. |
| ● | We have a five year vesting period for our annual restricted stock grants to executive officers. |
| ● | We respond to economic conditions appropriately, such as freezing various base salaries during an economic downturn. |
| ● | We do not make it a practice to provide tax gross-ups to our named executive officers. |
| ● | We have no employment, severance or golden parachute agreements with any of our named executive officers and therefore, no excise tax gross-ups. |
The Board strongly endorses the Company’s executive compensation program and unanimously recommends that the stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:
RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officersour Board, as described in this proxy statement under “Executive“Director Compensation,” includingor on our compensation policies as they relate to risk management, as described under “Compensation Risk Considerations” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the tabular and narrative disclosure contained in this proxy statement.
The advisory vote on executive compensation will be approved if it receives a majority of votes cast by shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at such Annual Meeting, provided a quorum is present. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote, provided a quorum is present.
“Executive Compensation” section above.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR Proposal 2.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF THE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act requires us to submit a non-binding, advisory resolution to stockholders at least once every six years to determine whether advisory votes on executive compensation (commonly referred to as “say-on-pay”) should be held every one, two or three years. This non-binding, advisory resolution is commonly referred to as “say-on-frequency.” We last submitted a say-on-frequency resolution for a stockholder vote in
2011.2017. At that time, our Board recommended, and our stockholders voted in favor of, including a non-binding advisory vote on executive compensation in our proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders every year.
After careful consideration of this proposal, our Board has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs annually is the most appropriate alternative for the Company, and therefore our Board recommends that you vote for a one-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation.
In formulating its recommendation, our Board considered that an advisory vote on executive compensation every year will allow our stockholders to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year. Setting a one year period for holding this stockholder vote will enhance stockholder communication by providing a clear, simple means for the Company to obtain information on investor sentiment about our executive compensation philosophy.
You may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing the option of one year, two years, three years or abstain from voting when you vote in response to the resolution set forth below.
“RESOLVED, on an advisory basis, that the stockholders’ preferred frequency as to which the Company is to hold a stockholder advisory vote to approve the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, shall either be once every year, once every two years or once every three years, as determined by whichever frequency-option
receivesa majority of the
highest number of votes
cast.cast by shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.”
The option of one year, two years or three years that receives
a majority of the
highest number of votes cast by
stockholdersshares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation that has been selected by stockholders. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on the Board in any way, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the option approved by our stockholders.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote for “1“ONE YEAR”.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has:
reviewed and discussed with management the Company’s annual audited financial statements for 2022;
discussed with E&Y, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC;
received from E&Y the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding E&Y’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence; and
discussed with E&Y its independence.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the December 31, 2022 audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2022 for filing with the SEC.
While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities set forth in its charter (including to monitor and oversee the audit processes), the Audit Committee does not have the duty to plan or conduct audits or to determine that Hub Group’s financial statements are complete, accurate or in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Hub Group’s management and independent auditor have this responsibility.
This report has been furnished by the members of the Audit Committee:
Peter B. McNitt, Chairman
Mary H. Boosalis
Lisa Dykstra
Michael E. Flannery
James C. Kenny
Jenell Ross
Martin P. Slark
Gary Yablon
The above Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Hub Group filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent Hub Group specifically incorporates this report by reference therein.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROPOSAL 4: RATIFICATION OF
THE SELECTIONAPPOINTMENT OF
ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS HUB GROUP’SINDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRMAUDITORS
The Board is asking our stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young, LLP (“EY”)E&Y as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. EY has been the Company’s auditors since 2002.2023. Although we are not required to obtain stockholder ratification of the selection of EY,E&Y, our Board believesand Audit Committee believe that the selection of an independent registered public accounting firm is an important matter and in the best interests of stockholders. For additional information regarding
Who is responsible for the Company’s relationship with EY, please referselection of the independent auditor?
The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the independent auditor that is retained to audit our financial statements.
Was the Audit Committee Reportinvolved in the lead audit partner selection process?
Yes. Prior to the selection of the current lead audit partner, the Chairman of the Audit Committee interviewed the lead audit partner candidates, and the
Independent Public Accountants information contained above.Audit Committee discussed with management such candidates’ qualifications and experience.
Does the Audit Committee evaluate the independent auditor and the lead audit partner?
Yes. The Audit Committee annually evaluates the lead audit partner, as well as the independent auditor’s qualifications, performance, and independence. The evaluation, which includes the input of management, entails consideration of a broad range of factors, including the quality of services and sufficiency of resources that have been provided; the skills, knowledge, and experience of the firm and the audit team; the effectiveness and sufficiency of communications and interactions; independence and level of objectivity and professional skepticism; reasonableness of fees; and other factors.
Who has the Audit Committee selected as the independent registered public accounting firm?
After conducting the evaluation process discussed above, the Audit Committee selected E&Y as our independent auditor for 2023. E&Y has served in that capacity since October 2002. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors believe that the continued retention of E&Y is in the best interests of Hub Group and our stockholders.
Will representatives of Ernst & Young LLP attend the Annual Meeting?
Yes. Representatives of E&Y have been requested and are expected to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. These representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to any appropriate questions submitted by stockholders.
What if stockholders do not ratify the appointment?
If the appointment of
EYE&Y as our independent registered public accounting firm for
20172023 is not ratified by our stockholders, the adverse vote will be considered a direction to the Audit Committee to consider other auditors for next year. However, because of the difficulty in making any substitution of auditors after the beginning of the current year, the
2023 appointment
for 2017 will stand, unless the Audit Committee finds other good reason
for making a change.Representatives of EY will be present at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so.
change.
The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” Proposal 4.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The fees billed by E&Y in 2022 and 2021 for services provided to us were as follows:
Audit Fees(1) | | | $2,721,655 | | | $2,350,557 |
Audit-Related Fees(2) | | | $195,000 | | | $262,000 |
Tax Fees(3) | | | $56,596 | | | $44,710 |
All Other Fees | | | $— | | | $— |
TOTAL | | | $2,973,251 | | | $2,657,267 |
(1)
| “Audit Fees” are the aggregate fees billed by E&Y for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements during 2022 and 2021. |
(2)
| “Audit-Related Fees” are the aggregate fees billed by E&Y during for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and not included in the “audit fees” described above. The 2022 and 2021 Audit-Related Fees relate to acquisitions made by the Company, as well as assistance with financial due diligence for potential acquisitions. |
(3)
| “Tax Fees” are the aggregate billed by E&Y during 2022 and 2021 for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. |
The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the Company’s independent auditors and has established pre-approval policies and procedures for such services. Permissible non-audit services are those allowed under SEC regulations. The Audit Committee may approve certain specific categories of permissible non-audit services within an aggregated budgeted dollar limit upon the opinion that such services will not impair the independence of the independent auditor. The Audit Committee must approve on a project-by-project basis any permissible non-audit services that do not fall within a pre-approved category, or pre-approved permissible non-audit services that exceed the previously approved fees. The Audit Committee’s Chairman (or any Audit Committee member if the Chairman is unavailable) may pre-approve such services between Audit Committee meetings and must report to the Committee at its next meeting with respect to all services so pre-approved. All services provided by E&Y during 2022 and 2021 were approved by the Audit Committee and were permissible under applicable laws and regulations and will continue to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROPOSAL 5: APPROVAL OF
AMENDMENT TO OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO LIMIT THE
HUB GROUP, INC. 2017 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLANLIABILITY OF CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY AS PERMITTED BY RECENT AMENDMENTS TO DELAWARE LAW
The State of Delaware, which is our state of incorporation, recently enacted legislation that enables Delaware companies to limit the liability of certain officers in limited circumstances. In light of this update, our Board recommends approvalhas determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to add a provision exculpating certain of the Company’s 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The following summaryofficers from liability in specific circumstances, as permitted by Delaware law. We refer to this proposed amendment as the Charter Amendment. We believe it is appropriate to provide protection to officers to the fullest extent permitted by law in order to attract and retain top talent. This protection has long been afforded to directors. Accordingly, the Board is asking our stockholders to approve and adopt the Charter Amendment.
Background on the Charter Amendment
In August 2022, Section 102(b)(7) of the Plan is qualifiedDelaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) was amended to authorize corporations to adopt a provision in its entiretytheir certificate of incorporation to eliminate or limit monetary liability of certain corporate officers for breach of the fiduciary duty of care in certain circumstances. Previously, the DGCL allowed only exculpation of corporate directors for breach of the fiduciary duty of care. As amended, Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL authorizes corporations to provide for exculpation of the following officers: (i) the corporation’s president, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial officer, chief legal officer, controller, treasurer or chief accounting officer, (ii) “named executive officers” identified in the corporation’s SEC filings, and (iii) individuals who have agreed to be identified as officers of the corporation.
Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, which limits the scope of the Charter Amendment, only permits the exculpation of certain officers in connection with direct claims brought by stockholders, including class actions, but would not eliminate officers’ monetary liability for breach of fiduciary duty claims brought by the completecorporation itself or for derivative claims brought by stockholders in the name of the corporation. In addition, as is currently the case with directors under our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Charter Amendment, as limited by the DGCL, would not limit the liability of officers for any breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, any acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law and any transaction from which the officer derived an improper personal benefit. Article ELEVENTH, Section 1 in our Certificate currently provides for the exculpation of directors, but does not include a provision that allows for the exculpation of officers.
Our Board determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to amend the current exculpation and liability provisions in Article ELEVENTH, Section 1 of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to extend exculpation protection to our officers in addition to our directors.
Overview of the Charter Amendment
Changes to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation contemplated by this Proposal 5 are indicated below by underlined text below. The full text of the
Plan contained in Exhibit A.Background
We previously maintainedCompany’s currently applicable Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was filed as an exhibit to the Hub Group, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Prior Plan”). Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed July 23, 2007. The Charter Amendment would amend Article ELEVENTH, Section 1 to extend the exculpation provision to certain of our officers as permitted by amended DGCL Section 102(b)(7) so that it would state its entirety as follows:
“Section 1. Liability of Directors. A director or officer of this Corporation shall not be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer, except to the extent such exemption from liability or limitation thereof is not permitted under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware as the same exists or may hereafter be amended. Any repeal or modification of the foregoing paragraph shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a director or officer of the Corporation existing hereunder with respect to any act or omission occurring prior to such repeal or modification.”
Reasons for the Charter Amendment
The Board believes it is important to provide protection from certain liabilities and expenses that may discourage prospective or current directors from accepting or continuing membership on corporate boards and prospective or current officers from serving corporations. In the absence of such protection, qualified directors
TABLE OF CONTENTS
and officers might be deterred from serving as directors or officers due to exposure to personal liability and the risk that substantial expense will be incurred in defending lawsuits, regardless of merit. In particular, the Board took into account the narrow class and type of claims from which such officers would be exculpated from liability pursuant to amended DGCL Section 102(b)(7), the limited number of our officers that would be impacted, and the benefits the Board believes would accrue to the Company by providing exculpation in accordance with DGCL Section 102(b)(7), including, without limitation, the ability to attract and retain key officers and the potential to reduce litigation costs associated with frivolous lawsuits. The Board also believes the Charter Amendment clarifies the roles and responsibilities of directors and officers. Without the Charter Amendment, officers, who act at the direction of the Board, face greater potential legal liability than the directors who oversee them. The Board believes the Charter Amendment will strengthen the role of the Board and help ensure alignment between the Company’s officers and directors.
For the reasons stated above, and upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Board adopted
resolutions setting forth the
Plan effective as of March 15, 2017 in order to have in place a plan that included provisions that are currently commonCharter Amendment, declared the Charter Amendment advisable and in the
market and to enable us to grant a broader spectrum of awards, including awards that are performance-based for purposes of section 162(m)best interests of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).Section 162(m) ofCompany and its stockholders, and unanimously resolved to submit the Code provides that certain compensation in excess of $1 million that is paidCharter Amendment to the chief executive officer and the next three most highly paid officers of a public company (other than the chief financial officer)our stockholders for approval.
The Charter Amendment is not deductible. Compensation which constitutes “performance-based compensation” within the meaningbeing proposed in response to any specific resignation, threat of Section 162(m) generally is not subjectresignation or refusal to the foregoing limitations. In order to constitute “performance-based compensation,” our stockholders must approve the material terms of the plan pursuant to which the compensation is granted and certain other requirements must be met. Generally, such stockholder approval is required every five years after initial approval. The Plan includes terms that will enable us to grant “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) provided thatserve by any officer.
Additional Information
If our stockholders approve the
Plan.A total of 707,273 shares of our Class A common stock (“Common Stock”) remain available to be issuedCharter Amendment, it will become effective upon exercise or settlement of outstanding awards under the Prior Plan asfiling of the dateCertificate of this proxy statement. IfAmendment with the Plan is approved by our stockholders, no future grants will be made under the Prior Plan. Any awards made under the Plan before approval by our stockholders will not vest or be exercisable prior to such approval and any awards granted before such approval will be forfeited if such approval is not obtained. AsDelaware Secretary of the date of this proxy statement,Cash Incentive Awards (as more fully described below) have been granted under the Plan to our named executive officers and other persons who we believe may be or become covered employees for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code. These awards will be forfeited in their entirety in the event the Plan is not approved by our shareholders.
The Plan authorizes a broad range of awards including stock options (“Options”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), Full Value Awards (as more fully described below, including restricted stock, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance shares or units and other stock-based awards) and Cash Incentive Awards. A person who has been granted an award under the Plan is referred to herein as a “Participant” in the Plan.
The Plan is not qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code, or, except for the deferred delivery of shares of Common Stock, subject to any provision of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
On March 15, 2017, the last reported sale price of our Common Stock on the NASDAQ stock market was $48.20 per share.
Purpose and Overview
The purpose of the Plan is to:
| ● | attract and retain persons who are eligible to participate in the Plan; |
| ● | advance our interests and the interests of our stockholders by providing persons who are eligible to participate in the Plan, upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts we largely depend, with appropriate incentives to perform in a superior manner and achieve long-range goals, and |
| ● | to further align the interests of Participants with those of our stockholders, and to thereby promote the growth and long-term financial interests of us and our related companies and long-term stockholder return. |
Restriction on Repricing
The Plan includes a restriction providing that, without stockholder approval or other than as a result of adjustments in connection with corporate transactions, we cannot decrease the exercise price of an Option or SAR after the date of grant or permit any Option or SAR to be surrendered to us as consideration for the grant of a replacement Option or SAR with a lower exercise price or a Full Value Award. In addition, in no event may an Option or SAR granted under the Plan be surrendered to us in consideration for a cash payment if, at the time of such surrender, the exercise price of the Option or SAR is greater than the then current fair market value of a share of Common Stock.
Description of Plan
Administration
The Plan requires that it be administered by a committee of not fewer than two directors (or a greater number if required for compliance with certain securities laws) who are independent for purposes of stock exchange listing requirements and are non-employee directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). If an award is intended to constitute “performance-based compensation” for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code, including Options and SARs, the Committee will consist solely of two or more outside directors within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Code and applicable regulations. In the case of awards to outside directors, the Committee is the Board. Except as provided in the preceding sentence, the Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board (the “Committee”). The Committee selects award recipients under the Plan who will thereby become Participants, the types of awards to be granted and the applicable terms, conditions, performance criteria, restrictions and other provisions of such awards. The Committee also has the authority to conclusively interpret the Plan and to adopt rules and procedures relating to the Plan and awards made thereunder. Subject to stock exchange listing rules and applicable law, the Committee may delegate all or any portion of its responsibilities or powers under the Plan to persons selected by it.
Eligibility
All officers, directors or other employees of us or a related company, consultants, independent contractors or agents of us or a related company, and persons who are expected to become officers, employees, directors, consultants, independent contractors or agents of us or a related company including, in each case, directors who are not employees of us or any related company (“Outside Directors”), are eligible to receive awards under the Plan and thereby become Participants in the Plan. Awards to a person who is expected to become a service provider to us or a related company cannot be effective prior to the date on which such person’s service begins. Incentive stock options (“ISOs”) may only be granted to employees of us and our corporate related companies which satisfy certain Code requirements. Generally, a company is a related company to us for any period during which (i) it owns, directly or indirectly, at least 30% of the voting power of all classes of our stock (or any successor to us) entitled to vote or (ii) it is effectively controlled by, or at least 30% of its voting or profits interest is owned, directly or indirectly, by us (or any successor to us) or a other related company.
Approximately 2,760 employees and directors were eligible on an annual basis to receive awards under the Prior Plan, and in 2016, we granted equity awards under the Prior Plan of the type authorized in the Plan to approximately 211 persons.
Shares of Common Stock Available for Awards
Awards may be made under the Plan with respect to Common Stock currently authorized but unissued or, as permitted by applicable law, currently held or acquired by us as treasury shares, including shares of Common Stock purchased in the open market or in private transactions. At the discretion of the Committee, an award under the Plan may be settled in cash rather than Common Stock.
Substitute Awards will not reduce the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan or that may be covered by awards granted to any one Participant during any period as described below. Generally, a “substitute award” is an award that is granted or shares of Common Stock issued by us in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, an award previously granted, or the right or obligation to make a future award, in all cases by a company acquired by us or a related company or withState, which we or a related company combines.
The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered under the Plan is equal to the sum of (i) 1,300,000 shares, plus (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of the date the Plan is approved by our stockholders (the “Approval Date”), plus (iii) shares of Common Stock that are represented by awards outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Approval Date that are not delivered to a Participant or beneficiary because (A) the award expires, is forfeited or is cancelled, (B) the award is terminated without issuance of shares of Common Stock (including shares that are attributable to awards under the Prior Plan that are settled in cash), or (C) the award is tendered or withheld in payment of the exercise price or the taxes payable with respect to the exercise, vesting or settlement of the award under the Prior Plan.
The following additional limits apply to awards under the Plan:
| ● | the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered to Participants and their beneficiaries with respect to ISOs under the Plan will be equal to the overall number of shares reserved for issuance under the Plan; provided that to the extent that shares not delivered must be counted against this limit as a condition of satisfying the rules applicable to ISOs, such rules shall apply to the limit on ISOs granted under the Plan; |
| ● | in the case of Options and SARs that are intended to be “performance-based compensation,” the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be covered by such awards granted to any one Participant in any one of our fiscal years may not exceed 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock; |
| ● | in the case of Full Value Awards that are intended to be “performance-based compensation,” the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be delivered pursuant to any such award granted to any one Participant during any one of our fiscal years, regardless of whether settlement of the award is to occur prior to, at the time of, or after the time of vesting, may not exceed 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock; provided, however, that if the Full Value Award is denominated in cash, no more than $10,000,000 may be subject to any such Full Value Award granted to any individual during any one of our fiscal years; |
| ● | in the case of Cash Incentive Awards that are intended to be “performance-based compensation,” the maximum amount payable to any one Participant with respect to any performance period of twelve months (prorated for performance periods of greater or lesser than 12 months) is $10,000,000; and |
| ● | in the case of any award to an Outside Director, in no event shall the dollar value of the award granted to any Director for any calendar year (determined as of the date of grant) exceed $1,000,000. |
In the case of Full Value Awards and Cash Incentive Awards that are intended to be “performance-based compensation,” if the award is denominated in shares but an equivalent amount of cash is delivered (or vice versa), the foregoing limitations will be applied based on the methodology used by the Committee to convert shares of Common Stock to cash (or vice versa). If delivery of cash or shares of Common Stock is deferred until after the cash or shares of Common Stock are earned, any adjustment in the amount delivered to reflect actual or deemed investment experience after the cash or shares of Common Stock are earned will be disregarded.
In the event of a corporate transaction, including a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, exchange of shares, sale of assets or subsidiaries, combination or other corporate transaction, that affects the Common Stock such that the Committee determines that an adjustment is warranted in order to preserve the benefits or prevent the enlargement of benefits of awards under the Plan, the Committee will make the following adjustments to awards in the manner that it determines to be equitable in its sole discretion:
| ● | adjustment of the number and kind of shares (or the amount of cash) which may be delivered under the Plan (including adjustments to the individual limitations described above); |
| ● | adjustment of the number and kind of shares (and the amount of cash) subject to outstanding awards; |
| ● | adjustment of the exercise price of outstanding Options and SARs; and |
| ● | any other adjustments that the Committee determines to be equitable, which may include, without limitation, |
| ○ | replacement of awards with other awards which the Committee determines have comparable value and which are based on stock of a company resulting from the transaction; and |
| ○ | cancellation of the award in return for cash payment of the current value of the award, determined as though the award is fully vested at the time of payment, provided that in the case of an Option or SAR, the amount of such payment may be the excess of the value of the shares of Common Stock subject to the Option or SAR at the time of the transaction over the exercise price. |
Types of Awards
Options
The Committee may grant Options to purchase shares of Common Stock, which Options may be either ISOs or non-qualified stock options (“NQOs”). The exercise price of an Option must be no less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date the Option is granted. ISOs may only be granted to employees of us or our permitted corporate subsidiaries and must satisfy other requirements of section 422 of the Code. An Option that does not satisfy the requirements for an ISO will be treated as a NQO. Except for reductions approved by our stockholders or adjustment for corporate transactions, the exercise price of an Option may not be decreased after the date of grant nor may an Option be surrendered to us as consideration for the grant of a replacement Option or SAR with a lower exercise price or a Full Value Award. In addition, except as approved by our stockholders, no Option granted under the Plan may be surrendered to us in consideration of a cash payment if, at the time of such surrender, the exercise price of the Option is greater than the then fair market value of a share of Common Stock. Options will be exercisable in accordance with the terms established by the Committee. The full exercise price of each share of Common Stock purchased upon the exercise of any Option must be paid at the time of exercise of the Option (except that if the exercise price is payable through the use of a cashless exercise arrangement approved by the Committee, the exercise price may be paidanticipate doing as soon as practicable after exercise). Subject to applicable law, the exercise price of an Option may be payable in cash, shares of Common Stock (valued at fair market value asfollowing stockholder approval of the dayCharter Amendment. Other than the replacement of exercise and including net exercise), or a combination thereof. The Committee may also authorize a third party cashless exercise program.
The Committee, in its discretion, may impose such conditions, restrictions, and contingencies on the shares of Common Stock acquired pursuant to the exercise of an Option as the Committee determines to be desirable, including conformity with our recoupment or clawback policies as in effect from time to time.
Except as providedexisting Article ELEVENTH, Section 1 by the Committee, an Optionproposed Article ELEVENTH, Section 1, the remainder of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation will expire on the earliest to occurremain unchanged after effectiveness of the following:
| ● | if the Participant’s termination date occurs by reason of retirement (as defined in the Plan), death or disability (as defined in the Plan), the one-year anniversary of such Date of Termination; |
| ● | if the Participant’s termination date occurs for reasons other than retirement, death or disability and is not a termination by us or a related company for cause, 90 days following such termination date; or |
| ● | if the Participant’s termination date occurs by reason of termination by us or a related company for cause, the termination date. |
Certificate of Amendment. In any event, an Optionaddition, we intend to file a Restated Certificate of Incorporation to integrate the Charter Amendment (if approved) into a single document. However, even if our stockholders approve the Charter Amendment, our Board retains discretion under Delaware law not to implement it. If our Board were to exercise such discretion, we will expire no later than the 10th anniversary of the date on which it is granted (or such shorter period required by the rules of any stock exchange on which the Common Stock is listed).
Stock Appreciation Rights
A SAR entitles the Participant to receive the amount (in cash or shares of Common Stock) by which the fair market value of a specified number of shares of Common Stock on the exercise date exceeds an exercise price established by the Committee, which exercise price may not be less than the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock at the time the SAR is granted. Generally, a SAR will be exercisable in accordance with the terms established by the Committee and SARs are generally subject to the same terms and restrictions as apply to Options as described above (except for matters, such as payment of the exercise price, which do not apply to SARs), including the prohibition on lowering of the exercise price, exchanges of the SAR for cash or other awards, the expiration date provisions,publicly disclose that fact, and the minimum vesting period.
Full Value Awards
A Full Value Award is a grant of one or more shares of Common Stock or a right to receive one or more shares of Common Stock in the future (including restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, performance stock and performance stock units). Such grants may be subject to such conditions, restrictions and contingencies as determined by the Committee, includingCompany’s current exculpation provisions relating to dividend or dividend equivalent rights and deferred payment or settlement. Notwithstandingdirectors will remain in place.
If our stockholders do not approve the
foregoing, no dividends or dividend equivalent rights will be paid or settled on awards that have not been earned or vested.
Cash Incentive Awards
A “Cash Incentive Award” isCharter Amendment, the grant of a right to receive a payment of cash (or in the discretion of the Committee, shares of Common Stock having value equivalent to the cash otherwise payable) that is contingent on achievement of performance objectives over a specified period established by the Committee. The grant of Cash Incentive Awards may also be subject to such other conditions, restrictions and contingencies as determined by the Committee, includingCompany’s current exculpation provisions relating to deferred payment.
Special Vesting Rules for Full Value Awards, Options and SARs
Except for (a) awards granteddirectors will remain in lieu of other compensation, (b) grants to new hires, and (c) grants that are a form of payment of earned performance awards or other incentive compensation, if (I) an employee’s right to become vested in a Full Value Award is conditioned on the completion of a specified period of service with us or a related company, without achievement of performance targets or other performance objectives (whether or not related the award is intended to be “performance-based compensation”) being required as a condition of vesting, then the required period of service for full vesting shall be not less than three years and (II) if an employee’s right to become vested in a Full Value Award is conditioned upon the achievement of performance targets or other performance objectives (whether or not related the award is intended to be “performance-based compensation”) being required as a condition of vesting, then the required vesting period shall be at least one year, subject, to the extent provided by the Committee, to pro rate vesting over the course of such three or one year period, as applicable, and to acceleration of vesting in the event of the Participant’s death, disability, involuntary termination, retirement or in connection with a change in control.
No Option or SAR may be exercised by a Participant: (i) prior to the date on which the Participant completes one continuous year of employment or service with us or any related company after the date as of which the Option is granted (provided, however, that the Committee may permit earlier exercise following the Participant’s termination date occurring by reason of death or disability).
Performance-Based Compensation
Performance awards granted to employees under the Plan that are intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” for purposes of section 162(m) of the Code will be paid, vested or otherwise deliverable solely on account of the attainment of one or more pre-established, objective performance targets established by the Committee in accordance with the requirements of section 162(m). The performance targets established by the Committee may be with respect to corporate performance, operating group or sub-group performance, individual company performance, other group or individual performance, or division performance, and shall be based on one or more of the following performance criteria:
| ● | earnings (e.g., earnings before income taxes, or “EBIT”; earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA”; earnings per share, or “EPS”); |
| ● | financial return ratios (e.g., return on investment, or “ROI”, return on invested capital, or “ROIC”, return on equity, or “ROE”, or return on assets, or “ROA”); |
| ● | operating or net cash flows; |
| ● | cash flow return on investment; |
| ● | total shareholder return; |
| ● | operating income or net income; |
| ● | cost improvement or containment; |
| ● | implementation or completion of significant projects or processes; |
| ● | cost targets, reductions and savings, productivity and efficiencies; |
| ● | strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, human resources management, supervision of litigation and other legal and compliance matters, information technology, and goals relating to contributions, dispositions, acquisitions, development and development related activity, capital markets activity and credit ratings, joint ventures and other private capital activity including generating incentive and other fees and raising equity commitments, and other transactions, and budget comparisons; or |
| ● | personal professional objectives, including any of the foregoing performance targets, the implementation of policies and plans, the negotiation of transactions, the development of long term business goals, formation and reorganization of joint ventures and other private capital activity including generating incentive and other fees and raising equity commitments, research or development collaborations, and the completion of other corporate transactions. |
The Committee is not prohibited from granting Full Value Awards or Cash Incentive Awards under the Planplace, and the Committee or any related company may grant any Cash Incentive Awards outsideCertificate of the Plan that are not intended to be “performance-based compensation.” Options and SARs granted under the Plan are assumed to constitute “performance-based compensation” provided that the requirements of section 162(m) of the Code are met with respect thereto and provided that the Committee does not make a determination to the contrary.
Change in Control
Except as provided by the Committee or otherwise in the Plan (or an agreement reflecting an applicable award), upon the occurrence of a Change in Control as defined in the Plan:
| ● | All outstanding Options and SARs (regardless of whether in tandem) shall become fully exercisable. |
| ● | All Full Value Awards and Cash Incentive Awards shall become fully vested; provided, however, that the treatment of any Full Value Award that is performance-based shall become vested as determined by the Committee. |
To the extent any provision of the Plan or an award agreement would cause a payment of deferred compensation that is subject to section 409A of the Code to be made upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, then such payment shall not be made unless such Change in Control also constitutes a “change in ownership,” “change in effective control” or “change in ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets” within the meaning of section 409A of the Code. In addition, if an award does not remain outstanding following a Change in Control, the Committee shall determine the vesting and other terms and conditions of the award in connection with the Change in Control in accordance with the terms of the Plan.
Non-U.S. Employees
The Committee may grant awards to eligible persons who are foreign nationals on such terms and conditions different from those specified in the Plan as may, in the judgment of the Committee, be necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement of the purposes of the Plan. In furtherance of such purposes, the Committee may make such modifications, amendments, procedures and subplans as may be necessary or advisable to comply with provisions of laws in other countries or jurisdictions in which we or a related company operates or has employees. The foregoing cannot be applied to increase the share limitations under the Plan or to otherwise change any provision of the Plan that would otherwise require the approval of our stockholders.
Other Plan Information
Awards under the Plan are not transferable except as designated by the Participant by will or by laws of descent and distribution. The Committee, however, may permit Awards (other than an ISO) to be transferred to or for the benefit of the Participant’s family (including, without limitation, to a trust or partnership for the benefit of a Participant’s family or in connection with a qualified domestic relations order) in accordance with rules established by the Committee.
All distributions under the Plan are subject to withholding of all applicable taxes, and the Committee may condition the delivery of any shares of Common Stock or other benefits under the Plan on satisfaction of the applicable withholding obligations. The Committee, in its discretion, and subject to such requirements as the Committee may impose prior to the occurrence of such withholding, may permit such withholding obligations to be satisfied through cash payment by the Participant, through the surrender of shares of Common Stock that the Participant already owns, or through the surrender of shares of Common Stock to which the Participant is otherwise entitled under the Plan. Previously-owned shares of Common Stock that have been held by the Participant or Common Stock to which the Participant is entitled under the Plan may only be used to satisfy the minimum tax withholding required by applicable law (or other rates that will not have a negative accounting impact).
The Board may, at any time, amend or terminate the Plan, and the Board or the Committee may amend any award agreement, provided that no amendment or termination may, in the absence of written consent to the change by the affected Participant (or, if the Participant is not then living, the affected beneficiary), adversely affect the rights of any Participant or beneficiary under any award granted under the Plan prior to the date such amendment is adopted by the Board (or the Committee, if applicable). The provisions of the Plan that prohibit repricing of Options and SARs cannot be amended unless the amendment is approved by the our stockholders and no other amendment shall be made to the Plan without the approval of our stockholders if such approval is required by law or the rules of any stock exchange on which the Common Stock is listed. Adjustment to awards made in connection with corporate transactions are not subject to the foregoing restrictions.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The discussion which follows is a summary, based on current law, of some significant U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to awards under the Plan. The following is based on U.S. federal tax laws and regulations presently in effect, which are subject to change, and the discussion does not purport to be a complete description of the federal income tax aspects of the Plan.
Non-qualified Stock Options
The grant of an NQO will not result in taxable income to the Participant. Generally, the Participant will realize ordinary income at the time of exercise in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock acquired over the exercise price for those shares of Common Stock, and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.
The exercise of an NQO through the delivery of previously acquired Common Stock will generally be treated as a non-taxable, like-kind exchange as to the number of shares of Common Stock surrendered and the identical number of shares of Common Stock received under the Option. That number of shares of Common Stock will take the same basis and, for capital gains purposes, the same holding period as the shares of Common Stock that are given up. The value of the shares of Common Stock received upon such an exchange that are in excess of the number given up will be includible as ordinary income to the Participant at the time of the exercise. The excess shares of Common Stock will have a new holding period for capital gain purposes and a basis equal to the value of such shares of Common Stock determined at the time of exercise.
Incentive Stock Options
The grant of an ISO will not result in taxable income to the Participant. The exercise of an ISO will not result in taxable income to the Participant provided that the Participant was, without a break in service, an employee of us or a corporate subsidiary during the period beginning on the date of the grant of the Option and ending on the date three months prior to the date of exercise (one year prior to the date of exercise if the Participant is disabled, as that term is defined in the Code).
If the Participant does not sell or otherwise dispose of the shares of Common Stock within two years from the date of the grant of the ISO or within one year after receiving the transfer of such shares of Common Stock, then, upon disposition of such shares of Common Stock, any amount realized in excess of the exercise price will be taxed to the Participant as capital gain, and weAmendment will not be entitled to any deduction for Federal income tax purposes. A capital loss will be recognized tofiled with the extent that the amount realized is less than the exercise price.
If the foregoing holding period requirements are not met, the Participant will generally realize ordinary income, and a corresponding deduction will be allowed to us, at the timeDelaware Secretary of State.
Vote Required; Recommendation of the
disposition of the shares of Common Stock, in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) the excess of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price, or (b) the excess, if any, of the amount realized upon disposition of the shares of Common Stock over the exercise price. If the amount realized exceeds the value of the shares of Common Stock on the date of exercise, any additional amount will be capital gain. If the amount realized is less than the exercise price, the Participant will recognize no income, and a capital loss will be recognized equal to the excess of the exercise price over the amount realized upon the disposition of the shares of Common Stock.Board
The exercise of an ISO through the exchange of previously acquired stock will generally be treated in the same manner as such an exchange would be treated in connection with the exercise of an NQO; that is, as a non-taxable, like-kind exchange as to the number of shares of Common Stock given up and the identical number of shares of Common Stock received under the Option. That number of shares of Common Stock will take the same basis and, for capital gain purposes, the same holding period as the shares of Common Stock that are given up. However, such holding period will not be credited for purposes of the one-year holding period required for the new shares of Common Stock to receive ISO treatment. Common shares received in excess of the number of shares of Common Stock given up will have a new holding period and will have a basis of zero or, if any cash was paid as part of the exercise price, the excess shares of Common Stock received will have a basis equal to the amount of the cash. If a disqualifying disposition (a disposition before the end of the applicable holding period) occurs with respect to any of the shares of Common Stock received from the exchange, it will be treated as a disqualifying disposition of the shares of Common Stock with the lowest basis.
Stock Appreciation Rights
A Participant generally will not realize any taxable income upon the grant of a SAR. Upon the exercise of the SAR, the Participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the amount of cash and/or the fair market value, at the date of such exercise, of the shares of Common Stock received by the Participant as a result of such exercise. We will generally be entitled to a deduction in the same amount as the ordinary income realized by the Participant.
Full Value Awards
The federal income tax consequences of a Full Value Award will depend on the type of award. The tax treatment of the grant of shares of Common Stock depends on whether the shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (determined under Code rules) at the time of the grant. If the shares are subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the Participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of the grant and when the restrictions on the shares lapse (that is, when the shares are no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture), the Participant will recognize ordinary taxable income in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares at that time. If the shares are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture or if the Participant elects to be taxed at the time of the grant of such shares under section 83(b) of the Code, the Participant will recognize taxable income at the time of the grant of shares in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares at that time, determined without regard to any of the restrictions. If the shares are forfeited before the restrictions lapse, the Participant will be entitled to no deduction on account thereof. The Participant’s tax basis in the shares is the amount recognized by him or her as income attributable to such shares. Gain or loss recognized by the Participant on a subsequent disposition of any such shares is capital gain or loss if the shares are otherwise capital assets.
In the case of other Full Value Awards, such as restricted stock units or performance stock units, the Participant generally will not have taxable income upon the grant of the award provided that there are restrictions on such awards that constitute a substantial risk of forfeiture under applicable Code rules. Participants will generally recognize ordinary income when the restrictions on awards lapse, on the date of grant if there are no such restrictions or, in certain cases, when the award is settled. At that time, the Participant will recognize taxable income equal to the cash or the then fair market value of the shares issuable in payment of such award, and such amount will be the tax basis for any shares received. In the case of an award which does not constitute property at the time of grant (such as an award of units), Participants will generally recognize ordinary income when the award is paid or settled.
We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount, and at the same time, as the income is recognized by the Participant.
Performance-Based Compensation
A tax deduction will generally be unavailable for annual compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any of the most highly compensated officers of a public corporation (not more than five). However, amounts that constitute “performance-based compensation” are not counted toward the $1 million limit. To preserve the deduction, we have designed the Plan to enable awards thereunder to constitute “performance-based compensation” and not be counted toward the $1 million limit although we reserve the right to make awards under the Plan that do not constitute “performance-based compensation”.
Parachute Payments
Any acceleration of the vesting or payment of awards under the Plan in the event of a change in control in the Company may cause part or all of the consideration involved to be treated as an “excess parachute payment” under the Code, which may subject the Participant to a 20 percent excise tax and preclude deduction by the Company.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The table below sets forth the following information as of March 22, 2017 for (i) all compensation plans previously approved by our shareholders and (ii) all compensation plans not previously approved by our shareholders:
Plan Category | | Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
| | | Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
| | | Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 707,273 | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Total | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | 707,273 | |
Other Information
Approval of the Plan will requireCharter Amendment requires the affirmative vote of the holders of shares having a majority of the votes present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, providedvoting power of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock outstanding, voting together as a quorum is present, with the result that shares that abstain from voting would count as votes against the Plansingle class. Abstentions and broker non-votes, wouldif any, have nothe same effect as an “against” vote. Brokers do not have authority to vote on the outcome.
Charter Amendments without instructions from the beneficial owner.
The Board of Directorsunanimously recommends that youa vote FOR“FOR” Proposal 5.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROXY SOLICITATION EXPENSEThe Company will pay the expense of any proxy solicitation. We have hired Alliance Advisors, LLC (’‘Alliance Advisors’’) to assist in the solicitation of proxies. Alliance Advisors’ fees for its assistance in the solicitation of proxies are estimated to be $7,500, plus out-of-pocket expenses. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mail, solicitation also may be made by telephone or personal interview by directors, officers, and regular employees of the Company, none of whom will receive additional compensation for any such solicitation. The Company will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks, and similar organizations for out-of-pocket and reasonable clerical expenses incurred in forwarding proxy material to their principals.
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
FOR 2024 ANNUAL MEETING
All stockholder proposals and notices discussed below must be mailed to Corporate Secretary, Hub Group, Inc., 2001 Hub Group Way, Oak Brook, Illinois 60523. Stockholder proposals and director nominations that are not included in our proxy materials will not be considered at any annual meeting of stockholders unless such proposals have complied with the requirements of our amended and restated Bylaws.
Stockholder Proposals
Proposals of
eligible stockholders
that comply with Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 must be received in writing by the
Corporate Secretary
of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company no later than
November 22, 2017,December 16, 2023, in order to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the
next annual meeting of stockholders.2024 Annual Meeting.
New Business at 2024 Annual Meeting
The Company anticipates that
its next annual meeting of stockholdersthe 2024 Annual Meeting will be held in May
2018.2024. If a stockholder desires to submit a proposal for consideration at the
next annual meeting2024 Annual Meeting, including nominations of
stockholders,persons for election to the Board, written notice of such stockholder’s intent to make such a proposal must be given and received by the
Corporate Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company either by personal delivery or by United States mail no earlier than February
9, 201825, 2024 nor later than March
11, 2018.26, 2024. Each notice must describe the proposal in sufficient detail for the proposal to be summarized on the agenda for the
annual meeting of stockholders2024 Annual Meeting and must set
forth: (i) the name and address,forth those items as
it appears on the books of the Company, of the stockholder who intends to make the proposal; (ii) a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of stock of the Company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person orrequired by
proxy at such meeting to present such proposal; and (iii) the class and number of shares of the Company which are beneficially owned by the stockholder. In addition, the notice must set forth the reasons for conducting such proposed business at the annual meeting of stockholders and any material interest of the stockholder in such business.our Bylaws. The presiding officer of the
annual meeting of stockholders2024 Annual Meeting will, if the facts warrant, refuse to acknowledge a proposal not made in compliance with the foregoing procedure, and any such proposal not properly brought before the
annual meeting of stockholders2024 Annual Meeting will not be considered.
See “PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – Can stockholders recommend or nominate directors?” for further discussion of the requirements to recommend a candidate to our Nominating and Governance Committee or nominate a director for election by stockholders.
| | | By order of the Board of Directors, |
| | | |
| | | THOMAS P. LAFRANCE |
| | DOUGLAS G. BECK | Secretary |
| | Secretary |
| | |
Oak Brook, Illinois | | | |
March 22, 2017April 14, 2023 | | | |
Each stockholder, whether or not he or she expects to be present in person ataccess the virtual Annual Meeting, is requested to please vote your proxy either by mail, telephone or over the Internet as promptly as possible. A stockholder may revoke his or her proxy at any time prior to voting.
EXHIBIT A
HUB GROUP, INC.
2017 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
1.1 Purpose. The Hub Group, Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) has been established by Hub Group, Inc. (the “Company”) to (a) attract and retain employees, directors and other persons providing services to the Company and its Related Companies (as defined herein); (b) advance the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing employees, directors and other persons providing services to the Company and its Related Companies, upon whose judgment, initiative and efforts the Company largely depend, with appropriate incentives to perform in a superior manner and achieve long-range goals, and (c) to further align the interests of Participants with those of the Company’s shareholders, and to thereby promote the growth and long-term financial interests of the Company and the Related Companies and long-term shareholder return.
1.2 Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein which are not otherwise defined in the Plan shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9 hereof.
| SECTION 2 | ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION. |
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Committee shall determine and designate, from time to time, from among the Eligible Individuals who will be granted one or more Awards under the Plan, and thereby become “Participants” in the Plan. In the discretion of the Committee, and subject to the terms of the Plan, a Participant may be granted any Award permitted under the provisions of the Plan, and more than one Award may be granted to a Participant. Except as otherwise provided by the Committee, or except as otherwise provided in the Plan or Award Agreement, an Award under the Plan shall not affect any previous Award under the Plan or an award under any other plan maintained by the Company or the Related Companies.
3.1 General. The authority to control and manage the operation and administration of the Plan shall be vested in the committee described in subsection 3.2 (the “Committee”) in accordance with this Section 3. If the Committee does not exist, or for any other reason determined by the Board, the Board may take any action under the Plan that would otherwise be the responsibility of the Committee.
3.2 Selection of Committee. So long as the Company is subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the Committee shall be selected by the Board and shall consist of not fewer than two members of the Board or such greater number as may be required for compliance with Rule 16b-3 issued under the Exchange Act and shall be comprised of persons who are independent for purposes of applicable stock exchange listing requirements. Any Award granted under the Plan which is intended to constitute Performance-Based Compensation (including Options and SARs) shall be granted by a Committee consisting solely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Code and applicable regulations. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, with respect to any Awards to Outside Directors, the Committee shall be the Board.
3.3 Powers of Committee. The authority to manage and control the operation and administration of the Plan shall be vested in the Committee, subject to the following:
| (a) | Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee will have the authority and discretion to (i) select Eligible Individuals who will receive Awards under the Plan, (ii) determine the time or times of receipt of Awards, (iii) determine the types of Awards and the number of shares of Stock covered by the Awards, (iv) establish the terms, conditions, performance targets, restrictions, and other provisions of Awards, (v) modify the terms of, cancel or suspend Awards, (vi) reissue or repurchase Awards, and (vii) accelerate the exercisability or vesting of any Award. In making such Award determinations, the Committee may take into account the nature of services rendered by the respective individual, the individual’s present and potential contribution to the Company’s or a Related Company’s success and such other factors as the Committee deems relevant. |
| (b) | Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee will have authority and discretion to determine the extent to which Awards under the Plan will be structured to conform to the requirements applicable to Performance-Based Compensation, and to take such action, establish such procedures, and impose such restrictions with respect to such Awards as the Committee determines to be necessary or appropriate to conform to such requirements. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A - 1
| (c) | The Committee will have the authority and discretion to conclusively interpret the Plan, to establish, amend, and rescind any rules and regulations relating to the Plan, to determine the terms and provisions of any agreements made pursuant to the Plan, and to make all other determinations that may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. |
| (d) | Any interpretation of the Plan by the Committee and any decision made by it under the Plan is final and binding on all persons. |
3.4 Delegation by Committee. Except to the extent prohibited by the provisions of Rule 16b-3, the rules relating to Performance-Based Compensation, applicable state law, the applicable rules of any stock exchange, or any other applicable laws, rules, or regulations (“Applicable Law”), the Committee may allocate all or any portion of its responsibilities and powers to any one or more of its members and may delegate all or any part of its responsibilities and powers to any person or persons selected by it. Any such allocation or delegation may be revoked by the Committee at any time.
3.5 Information to be Furnished to Committee. The Employer shall furnish the Committee with such data and information as may be required for it to discharge its duties. The records of the Employer as to an employee’s or Participant’s employment or service, termination of employment or service, leave of absence, reemployment and compensation shall be conclusive on all persons unless determined by the Committee to be incorrect. Participants and other persons entitled to benefits under the Plan must furnish the Committee such evidence, data or information as the Committee considers desirable to carry out the terms of the Plan.
3.6 Liability and Indemnification of Committee. No member or authorized delegate of the Committee shall be liable to any person for any action taken or omitted in connection with the administration of the Plan unless attributable to his own fraud or willful misconduct; nor shall the Employer be liable to any person for any such action unless attributable to fraud or willful misconduct on the part of a director or employee of the Employer. The Committee, the individual members thereof, and persons acting as the authorized delegates of the Committee under the Plan shall be indemnified by the Employer against any and all liabilities, losses, costs and expenses (including legal fees and expenses) of whatsoever kind and nature which may be imposed on, incurred by or asserted against the Committee or its members or authorized delegates by reason of the performance of a Committee function if the Committee or its members or authorized delegates did not act dishonestly or in willful violation of the law or regulation under which such liability, loss, cost or expense arises. This indemnification shall not duplicate but may supplement any coverage available under any applicable insurance.
| SECTION 4 | SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN AND OTHER LIMITATIONS. |
4.1 Shares and Other Amounts Subject to the Plan. The shares of Stock for which Awards may be granted under the Plan shall be subject to the following:
| (a) | The shares of Stock with respect to which Awards may be made under the Plan shall be shares of Stock currently authorized but unissued or currently held or, to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, subsequently acquired by the Company as treasury shares, including shares of Stock purchased in the open market or in private transactions. |
| (b) | Subject to the provisions of subsection 4.3, the maximum number of shares of Stock which may be issued with respect to Awards under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of (i) 1,300,000, plus (ii) the number of shares of Stock available for issuance under the Prior Plan as of the Approval Date (and immediately prior to Approval, plus (iii) shares of Stock that are represented by awards outstanding under the Prior Plan as of the Approval Date that are not delivered to a Participant or beneficiary because (A) the award expires, is forfeited or is cancelled, (B) the award is terminated without issuance of shares of Stock (including shares that are attributable to awards under the Prior Plan that are settled in cash), or (C) the award is tendered or withheld in payment of the exercise price or the taxes payable with respect to the exercise, vesting or settlement of the award under the Prior Plan. |
| (c) | Except as otherwise provided herein, any shares of Stock subject to an Award under the Plan which for any reason is forfeited, cancelled, expires or is terminated without issuance of shares of Stock (including shares that are attributable to Awards that are settled in cash) or is tendered or withheld in payment of the Exercise Price or the taxes payable with respect to the exercise, vesting or settlement of the Award, shall thereafter be available for further grants under the Plan. |
| (d) | Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the maximum number of shares of Stock that may be delivered to Participants and their beneficiaries with respect to Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall be equal to the number determined under paragraph 4.1(b);provided, however, that to the extent that shares not delivered must be counted against this limit as a condition of satisfying the rules applicable to Incentive Stock Options, such rules shall apply to the limit on Incentive Stock Options granted under the Plan. |
| (e) | Substitute Awards shall not reduce the number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan or that may be covered by Awards granted to any one Participant during any period pursuant to subsection 4.2. |
| (f) | Except as expressly provided by the terms of this Plan, the issue by the Company of stock of any class, or securities convertible into shares of stock of any class, for cash or property or for labor or services, either upon direct sale, upon the exercise of rights or warrants to subscribe therefor or upon conversion of stock or obligations of the Company convertible into such stock or other securities, shall not affect, and no adjustment by reason thereof, shall be made with respect to Awards then outstanding hereunder. |
| (g) | To the extent provided by the Committee, any Award may be settled in cash rather than in Stock. |
| 4.2 | Individual Limitations. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan: |
| (a) | The maximum number of shares of Stock that may be covered by Awards granted to any one Participant during any one Company fiscal year period pursuant to Section 5 (relating to Options and SARs) shall be 1,000,000 shares if such awards are intended to constitute Performance-Based Compensation. For purposes of this paragraph 4.2(a), if an Option is in tandem with an SAR, such that the exercise of the Option or SAR with respect to a share of Stock cancels the tandem SAR or Option right, respectively, with respect to such share, the tandem Option and SAR rights with respect to each share of Stock shall be counted as covering only one share of Stock for purposes of applying the limitations of this paragraph 4.2(a). For purposes of the Plan, it will be assumed that the grant of any Option or SAR is intended to constitute Performance-Based Compensation unless the Committee specifies otherwise. |
| (b) | For Full Value Awards that are intended to be Performance-Based Compensation, no more than 1,000,000 shares of Stock may be delivered pursuant to such Awards granted to any one Participant during any one Company fiscal year period (regardless of whether settlement of the Award is to occur prior to, at the time of, or after the time of vesting); provided, however, that if the Award is denominated in cash, no more than $10,000,000 may be subject to such Awards granted to any one individual during such Company fiscal year period; and provided further that, Awards described in this paragraph 4.2(b) shall be subject to the following: |
| (i) | If the Awards are denominated in Stock but an equivalent amount of cash is delivered in lieu of delivery of shares of Stock, the foregoing limit shall be applied based on the methodology used by the Committee to convert the number of shares of Stock into cash. |
| (ii) | If delivery of Stock or cash is deferred until after the Stock has been earned, any adjustment in the amount delivered to reflect actual or deemed investment experience after the date the Stock is earned shall be disregarded. |
| (c) | For Cash Incentive Awards that are intended to be Performance-Based Compensation, the maximum amount payable to any Participant with respect to any twelve (12) month performance period shall equal $10,000,000 (pro rated for performance periods that are greater or lesser than twelve (12) months); provided that Awards described in this paragraph 4.2(c), shall be subject to the following: |
| (i) | If the Awards are denominated in cash but an equivalent amount of Stock is delivered in lieu of delivery of cash, the foregoing limit shall be applied to the cash based on the methodology used by the Committee to convert the cash into Stock. |
| (ii) | If delivery of Stock or cash is deferred until after cash has been earned, any adjustment in the amount delivered to reflect actual or deemed investment experience after the date the cash is earned shall be disregarded. |
| (d) | In the case of any Award to an Outside Director, in no event shall the dollar value of the Award granted to any Director for any calendar year (determined as of the date of grant) exceed $1,000,000. |
4.3 Adjustments. In the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, extraordinary cash dividend, recapitalization, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, exchange of shares, sale of assets or subsidiaries, combination, or other corporate transaction that affects the Stock such that the Committee determines, in its sole discretion, that an adjustment is warranted in order to preserve the benefits or prevent the enlargement of benefits of Awards under the Plan, the Committee shall, in the manner it determines equitable in its sole discretion, (a) adjust the number and kind of shares which may be delivered under the Plan; (b) adjust the number and kind of shares (or the amount of cash) that may be granted to an individual during any specified time as described in subsection 4.2; (c) adjust the number and kind of shares (and the amount of cash) subject to outstanding Awards; (d) adjust the Exercise Price of outstanding Options and SARs; and (e) make any other adjustments that the Committee determines to be equitable (which may include, without limitation, (i) replacement of Awards with other awards which the Committee determines have comparable value and which are based on stock of a company resulting from the transaction, and (ii) cancellation of the Award in return for cash payment of the current value of the Award, determined as though the Award is fully vested at the time of payment, provided that in the case of an Option or SAR, the amount of such payment may be equal to the value of the shares of Stock subject to the Option or SAR at the time of the transaction less the Exercise Price).
| SECTION 5 | OPTIONS AND STOCK APPRECIATION RIGHTS. |
| (a) | The grant of an “Option” under the Plan entitles the Participant to purchase shares of Stock at an Exercise Price established by the Committee at the time the Option is granted. Options granted under this Section 5 may be either Incentive Stock Options or Non-Qualified Stock Options, as determined in the discretion of the Committee; provided, however, that Incentive Stock Options may only be granted to employees of the Company or an Affiliate. An Option will be deemed to be a Non-Qualified Stock Option unless it is specifically designated by the Committee as an Incentive Stock Option. |
| (b) | A grant of a “Stock Appreciation Right” or “SAR” entitles the Participant to receive, in cash or shares of Stock (as determined in accordance with the terms of the Plan) value equal to: (i) the Fair Market Value of a specified number of shares of Stock at the time of exercise; less (ii) an Exercise Price established by the Committee at the time of grant. |
5.2 Eligibility. The Committee shall designate the Participants to whom Options or SARs are to be granted under this Section 5 and shall determine the number of shares of Stock subject to each such Option or SAR and the other terms and conditions thereof, not inconsistent with the Plan. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee may not grant dividend or dividend equivalent rights (current or deferred) with respect to any Option or SAR granted under the Plan.
5.3 Limits on Incentive Stock Options. If the Committee grants Incentive Stock Options, then to the extent that the aggregate fair market value of shares of Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options are exercisable for the first time by any individual during any calendar year (under all plans of the Company and all Affiliates) exceeds $100,000, such Options shall be treated as Non-Qualified Stock Options to the extent required by section 422 of the Code. Any Option that is intended to constitute an Incentive Stock Option shall satisfy any other requirements of section 422 of the Code and, to the extent such Option does not satisfy such requirements, the Option shall be treated as a Non-Qualified Stock Option.
5.4 Tandem Grants of Options and SARs. An Option may but need not be in tandem with an SAR, and an SAR may but need not be in tandem with an Option (in either case, regardless of whether the original award was granted under this Plan or another plan or arrangement). If an Option is in tandem with an SAR, the exercise price of both the Option and SAR shall be the same, and the exercise of the corresponding tandem SAR or Option shall cancel the corresponding tandem SAR or Option with respect to such share. If an SAR is in tandem with an Option but is granted after the grant of the Option, or if an Option is in tandem with an SAR but is granted after the grant of the SAR, the later granted tandem Award shall have the same exercise price as the earlier granted Award, but in no event less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock at the time of such grant.
5.5 Exercise Price. The “Exercise Price” of an Option or SAR shall be established by the Committee at the time the Option or SAR is granted; provided, however, that in no event shall such price be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on such date (or, if greater, the par value of a share of Stock on such date); provided, however, that in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder, the Exercise Price may not be less than 110% of the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of grant.
5.6 Exercisability/Vesting. An Option or SAR granted under the Plan shall be exercisable in accordance with the following:
| (a) | The terms and conditions relating to exercise and vesting of an Option or SAR shall be established by the Committee to the extent not inconsistent with the Plan, and may include, without limitation, conditions relating to completion of a specified period of service, achievement of performance standards prior to exercise or the achievement of stock ownership guidelines by the Participant. |
| (b) | No Option may be exercised by a Participant: (i) prior to the date on which the Participant completes one continuous year of employment or service with the Company or any Related Company after the date as of which the Option is granted (provided, however, that the Committee may permit earlier exercise following the Participant’s Date of Termination by reason of death or Disability. |
| (c) | No Option or SAR may be exercised by a Participant prior to the date on which it is exercisable (or vested) or after the Expiration Date applicable thereto. |
5.7 Payment of Option Exercise Price. The payment of the Exercise Price of an Option granted under this Section 5 shall be subject to the following:
| (a) | Subject to the following provisions of this subsection 5.7, the full Exercise Price of each share of Stock purchased upon the exercise of any Option shall be paid at the time of such exercise (except that, in the case of a cashless exercise arrangement described in paragraph 5.7(c), payment may be made as soon as practicable after the exercise) and, as soon as practicable thereafter, a certificate representing the shares of Stock so purchased shall be delivered to the person entitled thereto or shares of Stock so purchased shall otherwise be registered in the name of the Participant on the records of the Company’s transfer agent and credited to the Participant’s account. |
| (b) | Subject to Applicable Law, the Exercise Price may be paid in cash or by tendering (including by way of a net exercise), by either actual delivery of shares or by attestation, shares of Stock acceptable to the Committee, and valued at Fair Market Value as of the day of exercise, or in any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee; |
| (c) | The Committee may permit a Participant to elect to pay the Exercise Price upon the exercise of an Option by irrevocably authorizing a third party to sell shares of Stock (or a sufficient portion of the shares) acquired upon exercise of the Option and remit to the Company a sufficient portion of the sale proceeds to pay the entire Exercise Price and any required tax withholding resulting from such exercise. |
5.8 No Repricing. Except for either adjustments pursuant to subsection 4.3 (relating to the adjustment of shares), or reductions of the Exercise Price approved by the Company’s shareholders, the Exercise Price for any outstanding Option or SAR may not be decreased after the date of grant nor may an outstanding Option or SAR granted under the Plan be surrendered to the Company as consideration for the grant of a replacement Option or SAR with a lower exercise price or a Full Value Award. Except as approved by the Company’s shareholders, in no event shall any Option or SAR granted under the Plan be surrendered to the Company in consideration for a cash payment if, at the time of such surrender, the Exercise Price of the Option or SAR is greater than the then current Fair Market Value of a share of Stock.
5.9 Expiration Date. The “Expiration Date” with respect to an Option or SAR means the date established as the Expiration Date by the Committee at the time of the grant (as the same may be modified in accordance with the terms of the Plan); provided, however, that the Expiration Date with respect to any Option or SAR shall not be later than the earliest to occur of the ten-year anniversary of the date on which the Option or SAR is granted (the five-year anniversary in the case of an Incentive Stock Option granted to a Ten Percent Shareholder) or the following dates, unless the following dates are determined otherwise by the Committee:
| (a) | if the Participant’s Date of Termination occurs by reason of Retirement, death or Disability, the one-year anniversary of such Date of Termination; |
| (b) | if the Participant’s Date of Termination, occurs for reasons other than Retirement, death or Disability and is not a termination by the Employer for cause, 90 days following such Date of Termination; or |
| (c) | if the Participant’s Date of Termination occurs by reason of termination by the Employer for cause, the Date of Termination. |
| SECTION 6 | FULL VALUE AWARDS AND CASH INCENTIVE AWARDS. |
| (a) | A “Full Value Award” is a grant of one or more shares of Stock or a right to receive one or more shares of Stock in the future (including restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, and performance units) which is contingent on continuing service, the achievement of performance objectives during a specified performance period, or other restrictions as determined by the Committee. The grant of Full Value Awards may also be subject to such other conditions, restrictions and contingencies as determined by the Committee, including provisions relating to dividend or dividend equivalent rights and deferred payment or settlement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no dividends or dividend equivalent rights will be paid or settled on Full Value Awards that have not been earned or vested. |
| (b) | A “Cash Incentive Award” is the grant of a right to receive a payment of cash (or in the discretion of the Committee, shares of Stock having value equivalent to the cash otherwise payable) that is contingent on achievement of performance objectives over a specified period established by the Committee. The grant of Cash Incentive Awards may also be subject to such other conditions, restrictions and contingencies, as determined by the Committee, including provisions relating to deferred payment. |
6.2 Special Vesting Rules. Except for (a) awards granted in lieu of other compensation, (b) grants to new hires, and (c) grants that are a form of payment of earned performance awards or other incentive compensation, if (I) an employee’s right to become vested in a Full Value Award is conditioned on the completion of a specified period of service with the Company or the Related Companies, without achievement of performance targets or other performance objectives (whether or not related to Performance Criteria) being required as a condition of vesting, then the required period of service for full vesting shall be not less than three years and (II) if an employee’s right to become vested in a Full Value Award is conditioned upon the achievement of performance targets or other performance objectives (whether or not related to performance measures) being required as a condition of vesting, then the required vesting period shall be at least one year, subject, to the extent provided by the Committee, to pro rated vesting over the course of such three or one year period, as applicable, and to acceleration of vesting in the event of the Participant’s death, Disability, involuntary termination, Retirement or in connection with a change in control.
6.3 Performance-Based Compensation. The Committee may designate a Full Value Award or Cash Incentive Award granted to any Participant as Performance-Based Compensation. To the extent required by section 162(m) of the Code, any Full Value Award or Cash Incentive Award so designated shall be conditioned on the achievement of one or more performance targets as determined by the Committee and the following additional requirements shall apply:
| (a) | The performance targets established for the performance period established by the Committee shall be objective (as that term is described in regulations under section 162(m) of the Code), and shall be established in writing by the Committee not later than ninety (90) days after the beginning of the performance period (but in no event after 25% of the performance period has elapsed), and while the outcome as to the performance targets is substantially uncertain. The performance targets established by the Committee may be with respect to corporate performance, operating group or sub-group performance, individual company performance, other group or individual performance, or division performance, and shall be based on one or more of the Performance Criteria. |
| (b) | A Participant otherwise entitled to receive a Full Value Award or Cash Incentive Award for any performance period shall not receive a settlement or payment of the Award until the Committee has determined that the applicable performance target(s) have been attained. To the extent that the Committee exercises discretion in making the determination required by this paragraph 6.3(b), such exercise of discretion may not result in an increase in the amount of the payment. |
Nothing in this Section 6 shall preclude the Committee from granting Full Value Awards or Cash Incentive Awards under the Plan or the Committee, the Company or any Related Company from granting any Cash Incentive Awards outside of the Plan that are not intended to be Performance-Based Compensation; provided, however, that, at the time of grant of Full Value Awards or Cash Incentive Awards by the Committee, the Committee shall designate whether such Awards are intended to constitute Performance-Based Compensation. To the extent that the provisions of this Section 6 reflect the requirements applicable to Performance-Based Compensation, such provisions shall not apply to the portion of the Full Value Award or Cash Incentive Award, if any, that is not intended to constitute Performance-Based Compensation.
| SECTION 7 | CHANGE IN CONTROL. |
Subject to the provisions of subsection 4.3 (relating to the adjustment of shares), and except as otherwise provided in the Plan or the Award Agreement reflecting the applicable Award, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control:
| (a) | All outstanding Options and SARs (regardless of whether in tandem) shall become fully exercisable. |
| (b) | All Full Value Awards and Cash Incentive Awards shall become fully vested; provided, however, that the treatment of any Full Value Award that is performance-based shall become vested as determined by the Committee. |
To the extent any provision of the Plan or an Award Agreement would cause a payment of deferred compensation that is subject to section 409A of the Code to be made upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, then such payment shall not be made unless such Change in Control also constitutes a “change in ownership”, “change in effective control” or “change in ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets” within the meaning of section 409A of the Code. In addition, if an Award does not remain outstanding following a Change in Control, the Committee shall determine the vesting and other terms and conditions of the award in connection with the Change in Control in accordance with the terms of the Plan.
| SECTION 8 | OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATION. |
8.1 Effective Date. The Plan was adopted by the Board effective March 15, 2017 (the “Effective Date”). Any awards made under the Plan prior to the Approval Date will not vest or be exercisable prior to the Approval Date and any awards granted prior to the Approval Date will be forfeited if the Approval Date does not occur by December 31, 2017. From and after the Approval Date, no awards shall be made under the Prior Plan. The Plan shall be unlimited in duration and, in the event of Plan termination, shall remain in effect as long as any Awards under it are outstanding; provided, however, that no Awards may be granted under the Plan after the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date.
8.2 Limit on Distribution. Distribution of shares of Stock or other amounts under the Plan shall be subject to the following:
| (a) | Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, the Company shall have no liability to deliver any shares of Stock under the Plan or make any other distribution of benefits under the Plan unless such delivery or distribution would comply with all Applicable Law and the applicable requirements of any securities exchange or similar entity. |
| (b) | In the case of a Participant who is subject to Section 16(a) and 16(b) of the Exchange Act, the Committee may, at any time, add such conditions and limitations to any Award to such Participant, or any feature of any such Award, as the Committee, in its sole discretion, deems necessary or desirable to comply with Section 16(a) or 16(b) and the rules and regulations thereunder or to obtain any exemption therefrom. |
| (c) | To the extent that the Plan provides for issuance of certificates to reflect the transfer of Stock, the transfer of such Stock may be effected on a non-certificated basis, to the extent not prohibited by Applicable Law or the rules of any stock exchange on which the Stock is listed. |
8.3 Settlements and Payments. Awards may be settled through cash payments, the delivery of shares of Stock, the granting of replacement Awards, or combination thereof as the Committee shall determine. Any Award settlement, including payment deferrals, may be subject to such conditions, restrictions and contingencies as the Committee shall determine. The Committee may permit or require the deferral of any Award payment (other than Option or SAR other than to the extent permitted by section 409A of the Code), subject to such rules and procedures as it may establish, which may include provisions for the payment or crediting of interest, or dividend equivalents, including converting such credits into deferred Stock equivalents. Each Subsidiary shall be liable for payment of cash due under the Plan with respect to any Participant to the extent that such benefits are attributable to the services rendered for that Subsidiary by the Participant. Any disputes relating to liability of a Subsidiary for cash payments shall be resolved by the Committee.
8.4 Restrictions on Shares and Awards. The Committee, in its discretion, may impose such restrictions on shares of Stock acquired pursuant to the Plan, whether pursuant to the exercise of an Option or SAR, settlement of a Full Value Award or otherwise, as it determines to be desirable, including, without limitation, restrictions relating to disposition of the shares and forfeiture restrictions based on service, performance, Stock ownership by the Participant, conformity with the Company’s recoupment, compensation recovery, or clawback policies and such other factors as the Committee determines to be appropriate. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, unless otherwise specified by the Committee, any Awards under the Plan and any shares of Stock issued pursuant to the Plan shall be subject to the Company’s compensation recovery, clawback, and recoupment policies as in effect from time to time.
8.5 Withholding. All Awards and distributions under the Plan are subject to withholding of all applicable taxes, and the Committee may condition the delivery of any shares or other benefits under the Plan on satisfaction of the applicable withholding obligations. The Committee, in its discretion, and subject to such requirements as the Committee may impose prior to the occurrence of such withholding, may permit such withholding obligations to be satisfied through cash payment by the Participant, through the surrender of shares of Stock which the Participant already owns, or through the surrender of shares of Stock to which the Participant is otherwise entitled under the Plan; provided, however, previously-owned Stock that has been held by the Participant or Stock to which the Participant is entitled under the Plan may only be used to satisfy the minimum tax withholding required by Applicable Law (or other rates that will not have a negative accounting impact).
8.6 Transferability. Awards under the Plan are not transferable except as designated by the Participant by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. To the extent that the Participant who receives an Award under the Plan has the right to exercise such Award, the Award may be exercised during the lifetime of the Participant only by the Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this subsection 8.6 the Committee may permit awards under the Plan to be transferred to or for the benefit of the Participant’s family (including, without limitation, to a trust or partnership for the benefit of a Participant’s family or in connection with a qualified domestic relations order), in accordance with rules established by the Committee.
8.7 Notices. Any notice or document required to be filed with the Committee under the Plan will be properly filed if delivered or mailed by registered mail, postage prepaid, to the Committee, in care of the Company, at its principal executive offices. The Committee may, by advance written notice to affected persons, revise such notice procedure from time to time. Any notice required under the Plan (other than a notice of election) may be waived by the person entitled to notice.
8.8 Form and Time of Elections. Unless otherwise specified herein, each election required or permitted to be made by any Participant or other person entitled to benefits under the Plan, and any permitted modification or revocation thereof, shall be in writing filed with the Committee at such times, in such form, and subject to such restrictions and limitations, not inconsistent with the terms of the Plan, as the Committee shall require.
8.9 Agreement With Company. At the time of an Award to a Participant under the Plan, the Committee may require a Participant to enter into an “Award Agreement” with the Company in a form specified by the Committee, evidencing the Award under the Plan, agreeing to the terms and conditions of the Plan and agreeing to such additional terms and conditions, not inconsistent with the Plan, as the Committee may, in its sole discretion, prescribe.
8.10 Limitation of Implied Rights.
| (a) | Neither a Participant nor any other person shall, by reason of the Plan, acquire any right in or title to any assets, funds or property of the Employer whatsoever, including, without limitation, any specific funds, assets, or other property which the Company or any Related Company, in their sole discretion, may set aside in anticipation of a liability under the Plan. A Participant shall have only a contractual right to the amounts, if any, payable under the Plan, unsecured by any assets of the Employer. Nothing contained in the Plan shall constitute a guarantee by the Company or any Related Company that the assets of the Employer shall be sufficient to pay any benefits to any person. |
| (b) | The Plan does not constitute a contract of employment or continued service, and selection as a Participant will not give any employee the right to be retained in the employ or service of the Company or any Related Company, nor any right or claim to any benefit under the Plan, unless such right or claim has specifically accrued under the terms of the Plan. Except as otherwise provided in the Plan, no Award under the Plan shall confer upon the holder thereof any right as a shareholder of the Company prior to the date on which he fulfills all service requirements and other conditions for receipt of such rights and shares of Stock are registered in his name. |
8.11 Evidence. Evidence required of anyone under the Plan may be by certificate, affidavit, document or other information which the person acting on it considers pertinent and reliable, and signed, made or presented by the proper party or parties.
8.12 Gender and Number. Where the context admits, words in any gender shall include any other gender, words in the singular shall include the plural and the plural shall include the singular.
8.13 Applicable Law. The provisions of the Plan shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois, without giving effect to choice of law principles.
8.14 Foreign Employees. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, the Committee may grant Awards to eligible persons who are foreign nationals on such terms and conditions different from those specified in the Plan as may, in the judgment of the Committee, be necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement of the purposes of the Plan. In furtherance of such purposes, the Committee may make such modifications, amendments, procedures and subplans as may be necessary or advisable to comply with provisions of laws in other countries or jurisdictions in which the Company or a Related Company operates or has employees. The foregoing provisions of this subsection 8.14 shall not be applied to increase the share limitations of Section 4 or to otherwise change any provision of the Plan that would otherwise require the approval of the Company’s shareholders.
| SECTION 9 | DEFINED TERMS.For purposes of the Plan, the terms listed below shall be defined as follows: |
| (a) | Affiliate. The term “Affiliate” means any entity which is a parent corporation (as defined in section 424(e) of the Code) or a subsidiary corporation (as defined in section 424(f) of the Code). |
| (b) | Applicable Law. The term “Applicable Law” is defined in subsection 3.4. |
| (c) | Approval Date. The term “Approval Date” means the date on which the Plan is approved by the Company’s shareholders. |
| (d) | Award. The term “Award” means any award or benefit granted to any Participant under the Plan, including, without limitation, the grant of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, or Full Value Awards or Cash Incentive Awards. |
| (e) | Award Agreement. The term “Award Agreement” means an agreement evidencing the grant of an Award hereunder as described in subsection 8.9 of the Plan. |
| (f) | Board. The term “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company. |
| (g) | Cash Incentive Award. The term “Cash incentive Award” is defined in paragraph 6.1(b). |
| (h) | Change in Control. For purposes of the Plan, the term “Change in Control” means a change in the beneficial ownership of the voting Stock or a change in the composition of the Board which occurs as follows: |
| (i) | Any “person” (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d)(2) of the Exchange Act is or becomes a beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of Stock representing 50 percent or more of the total voting power of the then outstanding Stock. |
| (ii) | A tender offer (for which a filing has been made with the SEC which purports to comply with the requirements of Section 14(d) of the Exchange Act and the corresponding SEC rules) is made for the Stock, which has not been negotiated and approved by the Board. In case of a tender offer described in this clause (ii), the Change in Control will be deemed to have occurred upon the first to occur of (A) any time during the offer when the person (using the definition in clause (i) above) making the offer owns or has accepted for payment Stock with 25 percent or more of the total voting power of the Stock, or (B) three business days before the offer is to terminate unless the offer is withdrawn first, if the person making the offer could own, by the terms of the offer plus any shares owned by this person, Stock with 50 percent or more of the total voting power of the Stock when the offer terminates. |
| (iii) | Individuals who were the Board’s nominees for election as directors of the Company immediately prior to a meeting of the shareholders of the Company involving a contest for the election of directors shall not constitute a majority of the Board following the election. |
| (i) | Code. The term “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. A reference to any provision of the Code shall include reference to any successor provision of the Code. |
| (j) | Committee. The term “Committee” is defined in subsection 3.1. |
| (k) | Company. The term “Company” means Hub Group, Inc. |
| (l) | Date of Termination. A Participant’s “Date of Termination” shall be the date that his service with the Company and the Related Companies terminates for any reason; provided that a Date of Termination shall not be deemed to occur by reason of a transfer of the Participant between the Company and a Related Company or between two Related Companies; and further provided that a Participant’s employment shall not be considered terminated while the Participant is on a leave of absence from the Employer approved by the Participant’s employer. In the case of an Outside Director, the “Date of Termination” means the date on which an individual ceases to be a member of the Board. |
| (m) | Disability. A Participant shall be considered to have a “Disability” during the period in which he is unable, by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, to engage in any substantial gainful activity, which condition, in the opinion of a physician selected by the Committee, is expected to have a duration of not less than 120 days. |
| (n) | Effective Date. The term “Effective Date” is defined in subsection 8.1 of the Plan. |
| (o) | Eligible Individual. The term “Eligible Individual” means any officer, director or other employee of the Company or a Related Company, consultants, independent contractors or agents of the Company or a Related Company, and persons who are expected to become officers, employees, directors, consultants, independent contractors or agents of the Company or a Related Company (but effective no earlier than the date on which such Person begins to provide services to the Company or a Related Company), including, in each case, Outside Directors. |
| (p) | Employer. The term “Employer” means, collectively, the Company and all Related Companies. |
| (q) | Exchange Act. The term “Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
| (r) | Exercise Price. The term “Exercise Price” is defined in subsection 5.5 of the Plan. |
| (s) | Expiration Date. The term “Expiration Date” is defined in subsection 5.9 of the Plan. |
| (t) | Fair Market Value. The term “Fair Market Value” of a share of Stock as of any date means the closing market composite price for such Stock as reported for the NASDAQ Stock Exchange on that date or, if Stock is not traded on that date, on the next preceding date on which Stock was traded. If the Stock is not at the time listed or admitted to trading on a stock exchange, the Fair Market Value shall be the closing average of the closing bid and asked price of a share of Stock on the date in question in the over-the-counter market, as such price is reported in a publication of general circulation selected by the Committee and regularly reporting the market price of Stock in such market. If the Stock is not listed or admitted to trading on any stock exchange or traded in the over-the-counter market, the Fair Market Value shall be as determined by the Committee in good faith. |
| (u) | Full Value Award. The term “Full Value Award” is defined in paragraph 6(a) of the Plan. |
| (v) | Incentive Stock Option. The term “Incentive Stock Option” means an Option that is intended to satisfy the requirements applicable to an “incentive stock option” described in section 422(b) of the Code. |
| (w) | Non-Qualified Option. The term “Non-Qualified Option” means an Option that is not intended to be an Incentive Stock Option. |
| (x) | Option. The term “Option” is defined in paragraph 5.1(a) of the Plan. |
| (y) | Outside Director. The term “Outside Director” means each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company or any Related Company. |
| (z) | Participant. The term “Participant” is defined in Section 2 of the Plan. |
| (aa) | Performance-Based Compensation. The term “Performance-Based Compensation” means compensation that satisfies the requirements for qualified performance-based compensation within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Code and regulations thereunder. |
| (bb) | Performance Criteria. The term “Performance Criteria” means any one or more of the following: (i) earnings (e.g., earnings before income taxes, or “EBIT”; earnings before income taxes, depreciation and amortization, or “EBITDA”; earnings per share, or “EPS”), (ii) financial return ratios (e.g., return on investment, or “ROI”; return on invested capital, or “ROIC”; return on equity, or “ROE”; return on assets, or “ROA”), (iii) revenue, (iv) operating or net cash flows, (v) cash flow return on investment, (vi) total shareholder return, (vii) market share, (viii) net operating income, operating income or net income, (ix) debt load reduction, (x) cost improvement or containment, (xi) expense management, (xii) economic value added, (xiii) stock price, (xiv) profit, (xv) margin, (xvi) operating expenses, (xvii) free cash flow, (xviii) implementation or completion of significant projects or processes; (xix) economic value created; (xx) cost targets, reductions and savings, productivity and efficiencies; (xxi) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, geographic business expansion, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, human resources management, supervision of litigation and other legal and compliance matters, information technology, and goals relating to contributions, dispositions, acquisitions, development and development related activity, capital markets activity and credit ratings, joint ventures and other private capital activity including generating incentive and other fees and raising equity commitments, and other transactions, and budget comparisons; and (xxii) personal professional objectives, including any of the foregoing performance targets, the implementation of policies and plans, the negotiation of transactions, the development of long term business goals, formation and reorganization of joint ventures and other private capital activity including generating incentive and other fees and raising equity commitments, research or development collaborations, and the completion of other corporate transactions. |
| (cc) | Plan. The term “Plan” means this Hub Group, Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as defined in subsection 1.1. |
| (dd) | Prior Plan. The term “Prior Plan” means the Hub Group, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan. |
| (ee) | Related Companies. The term “Related Company” means (i) any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other entity during any period in which it owns, directly or indirectly, at least thirty percent of the voting power of all classes of stock of the Company (or successor to the Company) entitled to vote; and (ii) any corporation, partnership, joint venture or other entity during any period in which either (A) it is effectively controlled by, or (B) at least thirty percent of its voting or profits interest is owned, directly or indirectly, by, the Company, any entity that is a successor to the Company or any entity that is a Related Company by reason of clause (i) next above. |
| (ff) | Retirement. The term “Retirement” means, except as provided by the Committee, (i) in the case of a Participant who is not an Outside Director, the occurrence of the Participant’s Date of Termination for reasons other than death or Disability or termination by the Employer for cause on or after the date on which the Participant (A) attains age 55, or (B) attains age 50 and has completed at least 10 continuous years of service with the Employer, and (ii) in the case of a Participant who is an Outside Director, the occurrence of the Outside Director’s Termination of Service on or after his attainment of age 65 for reasons other than death or Disability (and not removal for cause). |
| (gg) | SEC. The term “SEC” means the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
| (hh) | Stock. The term “Stock” means shares of Class A common stock of the Company. |
| (ii) | Stock Appreciation Right or SAR. The term “Stock Appreciation Right” or SAR” is defined in paragraph 5.1(b) of the Plan. |
| (jj) | Substitute Award. The term “Substitute Award” means an Award granted or shares of Stock issued by the Company in assumption of, or in substitution or exchange for, an award previously granted, or the right or obligation to make a future award, in all cases by a company acquired by the Company or any Related Company or with which the Company or any Related Company combines. In no event shall the issuance of Substitute Awards change the terms of such previously granted awards such that the change, if applied to a current Award, would be prohibited under subsection 5.8 (related to Options and SAR repricing). |
| (kk) | Ten Percent Shareholder. The term “Ten Percent Shareholder” means an employee of the Company or any of its Affiliates who, as of the date of grant of an Incentive Stock Option to such Eligible Individual, owns stock possessing more than 10 percent of the combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company and all of its Affiliates. |
| SECTION 10 | AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION. |
The Board may, at any time, amend or terminate the Plan, and the Board or the Committee may amend any Award Agreement, provided that no amendment or termination may, in the absence of written consent to the change by the affected Participant (or, if the Participant is not then living, the affected beneficiary), adversely affect the rights of any Participant or beneficiary under any Award granted under the Plan prior to the date such amendment is adopted by the Board (or the Committee, if applicable); and further provided that adjustments pursuant to subsection 4.3 shall not be subject to the foregoing limitations of this Section 10; and further provided that the provisions of subsection 5.8 (relating to Option and SAR repricing) cannot be amended unless the amendment is approved by the Company’s shareholders; and provided further that, no other amendment shall be made to the Plan without the approval of the Company’s shareholders if such approval is required by law or the rules of any stock exchange on which the Stock is listed. It is the intention of the Company that, to the extent that any provisions of this Plan or any Awards granted hereunder are subject to section 409A of the Code, the Plan and the Awards comply with the requirements of section 409A of the Code and that the Board shall have the authority to amend the Plan as it deems necessary or desirable to conform to section 409A of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company does not guarantee that Awards under the Plan will comply with section 409A of the Code and the Committee is under no obligation to make any changes to any Award to cause such compliance.
| |
HUB GROUP, INC.
2000 CLEARWATER DRIVE
OAK BROOK, IL 60523
| VOTE BY INTERNET -www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
| | |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: | | |
| | |
| E23414-P89871-Z69672 | KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
| DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. |
| | | | | | |
HUB GROUP, INC. | For
All | Withhold All | For All Except |
| The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR ALL the following: | | | |
| | | | | |
| 1. | Election of Directors | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| | | | | |
| | Nominees: | | | |
| | | | | |
| | 01) David P. Yeager 05) Charles R. Reaves02) Donald G. Maltby 06) Martin P. Slark
|
| | 03) Gary D. Eppen 07) Jonathan P. Ward
|
| | 04) James C. Kenny 08) Peter B. McNitt
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: | For | Against | Abstain |
| | | | | |
| 2. | Advisory vote on executive compensation. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 year for the following proposal: | 1 Year | 2 Years | 3 Years | Abstain |
| | | | | |
| 3. | Advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| | | | | |
| The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: | For | Against | Abstain |
| | | | | |
| 4. | Ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Hub Group’s independent registered accounting firm. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.
| |
| |
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] | Date |
To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
| | |
| |
| | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: | For | Against | Abstain |
| | | | |
5. | Approval of the Hub Group, Inc. 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
NOTE:Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| |
Signature (Joint Owners)
| Date |
V.1.2
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:
The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
|
|
|
|
|
HUB GROUP, INC.
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
May 10, 2017 10:00 AM CDT
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors |
|
The stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) David P. Yeager, as proxy, with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorize(s) him to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of common stock of HUB GROUP, INC. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 AM CDT on May 10, 2017 at 2000 Clearwater Drive, Oak Brook, IL 60523, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
|
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations. |
|
|
|
Continued and to be signed on reverse side |
|
|
|
V.1.2
